Does precut technique improve selective bile duct cannulation or increase post-ERCP pancreatitis rate? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2670-2680

  Gong, Biao ^a   Hao, Lixiao ^b   Bie, Like ^a   Sun, Bo ^c   Wang, Mei ^d  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b No 455 Hospital of People s Liberation Army of China   (China)

^c Gleneagles International Medical and Surgical Center   (China)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Cannulation; Common bile duct; Complications; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Meta analysis; Precut endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy

Indexed keywords

BILE DUCT CANNULATION; BLEEDING; CANNULATION; CHOLANGITIS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PRECUT ENDOSCOPIC BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 78650221698     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1033-y     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. ML Freeman NM Guda 2005 ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques Gastrointest Endosc 61 112 125 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02463-0 15672074 (Pubitemid 40169828)
2. PB Cotton 1989 Precut sphincterotomy a risky technique for the experts only Gastrointest Endosc 35 578 579 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2Fpt1ymtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0016-5107(89)72921-7 2599302
3. PV Sriram GV Rao D Nageshwar Reddy 2003 The precut-when, where and how? A review Endoscopy 35 S24 S30 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szptVGjtw%3D%3D 10.1055/s-2003-41528 12929050
4. SJ Tang GB Haber P Kortan S Zanati M Cirocco M Ennis A Elfant D Scheider H Ter J Dorais 2005 Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial Endoscopy 37 58 65 10.1055/s-2004-826077 15657860
5. PH Zhou LQ Yao MD Xu YS Zhong WD Gao GJ He YQ Zhang WF Chen XY Qin 2006 Application of needle-knife in difficult biliary cannulation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 5 590 594 17085348
6. A de Weerth U Seitz Y Zhong S Groth S Omar C Papageorgiou S Bohnacker S Seewald H Seifert KF Binmoeller F Thonke N Soehendra 2006 Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study Endoscopy 38 1235 1240 10.1055/s-2006-944962 17163325 (Pubitemid 44964047)
7. M Khatibian R Sotoudehmanesh A Ali-Asgari Z Movahedi S Kolahdoozan 2008 Needle-knife fistulotomy versus standard method for cannulation of common bile duct: a randomized controlled trial Arch Iranian Med 11 16 20
8. V Cennamo L Fuccio A Repici C Fabbri D Grilli M Conio N D'Imperio F Bazzoli 2009 Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study Gastrointest Endosc 69 473 479 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.037 19231488
9. Manes G, Di Giorgio P, Repici A, Macarri G, Ardizzone S, Porro GB (2009) An analysis of the factors associated with the development of complications in patients undergoing precut sphincterotomy: a prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol, advance online publication, 23 June 2009; doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.345
10. MO Meade WS Richardson 1997 Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review Ann Intern Med 127 531 537 1:STN:280:DyaK2svktlWisQ%3D%3D 9313021
11. PB Cotton G Lehman J Vennes JE Geenen RC Russell WC Meyers C Liguory N Nickl 1991 Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus Gastrointest Endosc 37 383 393 1:STN:280: DyaK3MzgtFChtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2 2070995
12. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG (1995) Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273:408-412
13. Begg CB (1994) Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds) The Handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, pp 399-410
14. GA Cortas SN Mehta NS Abraham AN Barkun 1999 Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes Gastrointest Endosc 50 775 779 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c%2FktVahtw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70157-4 10570335
15. H Schwacha HP Allgaier P Deibert M Olschewski U Allgaier HE Blum 2000 A sphicterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation Gastrointest Endosc 52 387 391 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvpsFCjtQ%3D%3D 10.1067/mge.2000.107909 10968855
16. CJ Larkin K Huibregtse 2001 Precut sphincterotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications Curr Gastroenterol Rep 3 147 153 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2FgslGrtA%3D%3D 10.1007/s11894-001-0012-9 11276383
17. ML Freeman DB Nelson S Sherman GB Haber ME Herman PJ Dorsher JP Moore MB Fennerty ME Ryan MJ Shaw JD Lande AM Pheley 1996 Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy N Engl J Med 335 909 918 1:STN:280:DyaK28zmsFaktw%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301 8782497 (Pubitemid 26314443)
18. S Loperfido G Angelini G Benedetti F Chilovi F Costan F De Berardinis M De Bernardin A Ederle P Fina A Fratton 1998 Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 48 1 10 1:STN:280:DyaK1czkslOquw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70121-X 9684657 (Pubitemid 28337421)
19. E Masci G Toti A Mariani S Curioni A Lomazzi M Dinelli G Minoli C Crosta U Comin A Fertitta A Prada GR Passoni PA Testoni 2001 Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 96 417 423 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ot12gsQ%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1572-0241. 2001.03594.x 11232684
20. ML Freeman NM Guda 2005 ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques Gastrointest Endosc 62 669 674 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.020 (Pubitemid 41654434)
21. ML Freeman 2002 Adverse outcomes of ERCP [review] Gastrointest Endosc 56 S273 S282 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70025-4 12447281
22. E Masci A Mariani S Curioni PA Testoni 2003 Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis Endoscopy 35 830 834 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svnsVGntw%3D%3D 10.1055/s-2003-42614 14551860 (Pubitemid 37254216)
23. C Mavrogiannis C Liatsos A Romanos C Petoumenos A Nakos G Karvountzis 1995 Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones Gastrointest Endosc 50 334 339 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98593 (Pubitemid 29418817)
24. MF Catalano JD Linder JE Geenen 2004 Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy Gastrointest Endosc 60 557 561 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01877-2 15472678 (Pubitemid 39311538)
25. J Halttunen I Keränen M Udd L Kylänpää 2009 Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation Surg Endosc 23 745 749 10.1007/s00464-008-0056-0 18649101