Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Endoscopy

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 381-388

  Cennamo, V ^a   Fuccio, L ^a   Zagari, R M ^a   Eusebi, L H ^a   Ceroni, L ^a   Laterza, L ^a   Fabbri, C ^b   Bazzoli, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b BELLARIA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHOLANGITIS; CHRONOLOGY; CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VATER PAPILLA STENOSIS; VATER PAPILLOTOMY;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; PANCREATITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77951721780     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243992     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Huibregtse K, Katon R M., Tytgat G N. Precut papillotomy via fine-needle knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1986 32 403-405
2. Binmoeller K F., Seifert H, Gerke H et al. Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 1996 44 689-695
3. Schwacha H, Allgaier H P., Deibert P et al. A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 52 387-391
4. Larkin C J., Huibregtse K. Precut sphincterotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2001 3 147-153
5. Cortas G A., Mehta S N., Abraham N S., Barkun A N. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 50 775-779
6. Shakoor T, Geenen J E. Pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992 38 623-627
7. Freeman M L., Guda N M. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 112-125
8. Sriram P V., Rao G V., Nageshwar R eddy D. The precut when, where and how? A review. Endoscopy 2003 35 S24-S30
9. Tang S J., Haber G B., Kortan P et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005 37 58-65
10. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A et al. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009 69 473-479
11. de Weerth A, Seitz U, Zhong Y et al. Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2006 38 1235-1240
12. Moher D, Cook D J., Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999 354 1896-1900
13. Greenland S. Meta-analysis. In: Rothman KJ GS, ed Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia Lippincot-Raven 1998 643-673
14. Juni P, Altman D G., Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001 323 42-46
15. Fuccio L, Guido A, Eusebi L H. et al. Effects of probiotics for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009 43 506-513
16. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari R M. et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 2343-2350
17. Fuccio L, Zagari R M., Eusebi L H. et al. Meta-analysis: can Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment reduce the risk for gastric cancer? Ann Intern Med 2009 151 121-128
18. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959 22 719-748
19. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986 7 177-188
20. Begg C B., Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994 50 1088-1101
21. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997 315 629-634
22. Galbraith R F. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med 1988 7 889-894
23. Hedges L V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego Academic Press 1985
24. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008], chapter 10. The Cochrane Collaboration 2008 Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org
25. Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S et al. Early decision for precut sphincterotomy: is it a risky preference? Dig Dis Sci 2007 52 845-851
26. Kaffes A J., Sriram P V., Rao G V. et al. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 62 669-674
27. Joo K, Jung S, Shin H et al. Early use of needle-knife fistulotomy in patients ith expected difficult biliary cannulation. Abstract presented at UEGW 2009 Nov 2125; London, UK. GASTRO 2009 in press
28. Zhou P H., Yao L Q., Xu M D. et al. Application of needle-knife in difficult biliary cannulation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2006 5 590-594
29. Khatibian M, Sotoudehmanesh R, Ali-Asgari A et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus standard method for cannulation of common bile duct: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Iran Med 2008 11 16-20
30. Manes G, Di Giorgio P, Repici A et al. An analysis of the factors associated with the development of complications in patients undergoing precut sphincterotomy: a prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 2412-2417
31. Cotton P B., Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991 37 383-393
32. Herbert R D., Bo K. Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews. BMJ 2005 331 507-509
33. Schulz K F., Chalmers I, Hayes R J., Altman D G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995 273 408-412
34. Bruins S lot W, Schoeman M N., Disario J A. et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications. Endoscopy 1996 28 334-339
35. Gottlieb K, Sherman S. ERCP and biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1998 8 87-114
36. Chen Y K., Foliente R L., Santoro M J. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 1994 89 327-333
37. Sherman S, Lehman G A. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991 6 350-367
38. Kasmin F E., Cohen D, Batra S et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: efficacy and complications. Gastrointest Endosc 1996 44 48-53
39. Vandervoort J, Soetikno R M., Tham T C. et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 652-656
40. Freeman M L., Guda N M. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 59 845-864
41. Freeman M L., Nelson D B., Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996 335 909-918
42. Wang P, Li Z S., Liu F et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 31-40
43. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 417-423
44. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni P A. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003 35 830-834
45. Cotton P B., Garrow D A., Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009 70 80-88
46. Goff J S. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 50 642-645
47. Baron T H. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: the first cut is the deepest. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 2 968-970
48. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 48 1-10
49. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 102 1781-1788
50. Ioannidis J P., Patsopoulos N A., Rothstein H R. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. BMJ 2008 336 1413-1415
51. Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 50 334-339
52. Brackbill S, Young S, Schoenfeld P, Elta G. A survey of physician practices on prophylactic pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 64 45-52
53. Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D et al. Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1993 39 652-657
54. Tarnasky P R., Palesch Y Y., Cunningham J T. et al. Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1998 115 1518-1524
55. Jacob L, Geenen J E., Catalano M F., Geenen D J. Prevention of pancreatitis in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: a prospective nonblinded randomized study using endoscopic stents. Endoscopy 2001 33 559-562
56. Fogel E L., Eversman D, Jamidar P et al. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy 2002 34 280-285