Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: A prospective multicenter study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1753-1761

  Testoni, Pier Alberto ^a   Mariani, Alberto ^a   Giussani, Antonella ^a   Vailati, Cristian ^a   Masci, Enzo ^a   MacArri, Giampiero ^b   Ghezzo, Luigi ^c   Familiari, Luigi ^d   Giardullo, Nicola ^e   Mutignani, Massimiliano ^f   Lombardi, Giovanni ^g   Talamini, Giorgio ^h   Spadaccini, Antonio ⁱ   Briglia, Romolo ^j   Piazzi, Lucia ^k  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b A Murri Hospital   (Italy)

^c S CROCE E CARLE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d Digestive Endoscopy Unit   (Italy)

^e S G MOSCATI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^g CARDARELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^h Pancreatic Endoscopy Unit   (Italy)

ⁱ San Pio Hospital   (Italy)

^j SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^k OSPEDALE CA FONCELLO   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; AGE; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILE DUCT STONE; BILIARY TRACT PAIN; CANNULATION; CHOLANGITIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL HISTORY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SPHINCTEROTOMY; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; VATER PAPILLA; VATER PAPILLOTOMY; WORK EXPERIENCE;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; ITALY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77955427195     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.136     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gottlieb K, Sherman S. ERCP and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomyinducedpancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1998; 8: 87-114.
2. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56(Suppl): S273-82.
3. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complicationsand their management: an attempt at consensus. GastrointestEndosc 1991; 37: 383-393
4. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopicbiliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918
5. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complicationsfrom diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10.
6. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic andtherapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol2001; 96: 417-423
7. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis:a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
8. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Th am TCK et al. Risk factors for complicationsaft er performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 652-656
9. Friedland S, Soetikno RM, Vandervoort J et al. Bedside scoring systemto predict the risk of developing pancreatitis following ERCP. Endoscopy2002; 34: 483-488
10. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis:a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-147
11. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J et al. Risk factors for complicationsaft er ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years.Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88
12. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: aprospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 31-40.
13. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH et al. Complications of endoscopicsphincterotomy: a prospective study with emphasis on the increased riskassociated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non-dilated bile ducts.Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 1068-1075
14. Sherman S, Hawes RH, Rathgaber SW et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized,prospective study comparing a low-and high-osmolality contrastagent. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 422-427
15. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M et al. The impact of skill and experienceof the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 628-636
16. Axon ATR, Classen M, Cotton PB et al. Pancreatography in chronic pancreatitis:international definitions. Gut 1984; 25: 1107-1112
17. Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ et al. The efficacy of endoscopicsphincterotomy aft er cholecystectomy in patients with sphincter of Oddidysfunction. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 82-87
18. Cotton PB. Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation ofERCP and alternative methods. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (6 Suppl):S283-90.
19. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. From the ASGE.American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. [No authors listed]Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 845-853
20. Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis.Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis,Atlanta, GA, September 11-13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 586-590
21. Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP et al. Acute pancreatitis: prognosticvalue of CT. Radiology 1985; 156: 767-772
22. Aronson N, Flamm CR, Bohn RL et al. Evidence-based assessment: patient,procedure, or operator factors associated with eRCP complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (Suppl): S294-302.
23. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis followingendoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-834
24. Sherman S, Lehman GA, Freeman ML et al. Risk factors for post-ERCPpancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study [Abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol1997; 92: 1639.
25. Dickinson RJ, Davies S. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia:the role of operative and patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol1998; 10: 423-428
26. Mehta SN, Pavone E, Barkun JS et al. Predictors of post-ERCP complicationsin patients with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 457-463
27. Laugier R, Bernard JP, Berthezene P et al. Changes in pancreatic exocrinesecretion with age: pancreatic exocrine secretion does decrease in theelderly. Digestion 1991; 50: 202-211
28. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Bulling D et al. Analysis of risk factorsassociated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminaryresults of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk ofacute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment. Endoscopy2000; 32: 10-19
29. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A et al. Timing of precut procedure does notinfluence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospectiverandomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 473-479
30. Slot WB, Schoeman MN, DiSario JA et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy asa precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications.Endoscopy 1996; 28: 334-339
31. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Risk factors for complicationfollowing ERCP: results of a large scale, prospective multicenter study.Endoscopy 2007; 39: 793-801.
32. Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, ofERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc2009; 70: 457-467