Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 793-801

  Williams, E J ^a   Taylor, S ^b   Fairclough, P ^c   Hamlyn, A ^d   Logan, R F ^e   Martin, D ^f,g   Riley, S A ^g   Veitch, P ^h,i   Wilkinson, M L ⁱ   Williamson, P R ^b   Lombard, Martin ^a  

^a ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d RUSSELLS HALL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^f WYTHENSHAWE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CHOLANGITIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; ODDI SPHINCTER; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34548181639     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966723     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Freeman MI. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (6 Suppl): S273-S282
2. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 417-423
3. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
4. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N EnglJ Med 1996; 335: 909-918
5. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, NeLson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
6. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Bulling D et al. Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatmemt. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 10-19
7. Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Carr-Locke DI. A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones. Implications for treatment. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 157-161
8. Mehta SN, Pavóne F, Barkun JS et al. Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998; 30:457-463
9. Tzovaras G, Shukla P, Kow L et al. What are the risks of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Aust N Z J Surg 2000; 70: 778-782
10. Motte S. Deviere J, Dumonceau JM et al. Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting. Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 1374-1381
11. Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA et al. Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate. Endoscopy 1994; 26: 209-216
12. Nelson DA Freeman ML. Major hemorrhage from endoscopic sphincterotomy: risk factor analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994; 19: 283-287
13. Maldonado ME, Brady PG, Mamel JJ et al. Incidence of pancreatitis in patients; undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM). Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 387-390
14. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 721-731
15. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-147
16. Aronson N, Flamm CR, Bohn RL et al. Evidence-based assessment: patient, procedure, or operator factors associated with ERCP complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (6 Suppl): S294-302
17. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large scale prospective survey of ERCP practice. Gut 2007; 56: 821-829
18. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
19. Concato J, Feinstein AP, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 201-210
20. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2000
21. American Society of Anesthesiology. Available from URL: http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm (accessed 9 March 2006)
22. Masci E, Mariani A Curioni S et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-834
23. Huibregtse K. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 961-963
24. Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Gerke H et al. Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 689-695
25. Foutch PG. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 25-32
26. Kasmin FE, Cohen D, Batra S et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center efficacy and complications. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 48-53
27. Vanudarajulu S, Kilgore MI, Wilcox CM et al. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 338-347
28. Perini RF, Sadurski R, Cotton PB et al. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 53-57
29. Singh P, Das A Isenberg G et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2004: 60: 544-550