Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: A prospective randomized trial

Endoscopy

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 58-65

  Tang, S J ^a   Haber, G B ^a,b   Kortan, P ^a   Zanati, S ^a   Cirocco, M ^a   Ennis, M ^a   Elfant, A ^a   Scheider, D ^a   Ter, H ^a   Dorais, J ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT ENDOSCOPY; BLEEDING; CANNULATION; CHOLANGITIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATITIS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 19944434112     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826077     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918
2. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
3. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
4. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 417-423
5. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 652-656
6. Freeman ML. Adverse events and success of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: S273-S282
7. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA et al. ERCP for diagnosis and therapy. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement; 2002 January 14-16. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 803-809
8. Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS, Barkun AN. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 775-779
9. Schwacha H, Allgaier HP, Deibert P et al. A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 387-391
10. Freeman ML. Towards improving outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1998: 48: 96-102
11. Dhir V, Mallath MK. Is precut papillotomy guilty as accused? [Letter]. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 143-144
12. Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Carr-Locke DL. A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones: implications for treatment. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 157-161
13. Slot WB, Schoeman MN, Disario JA et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 334-339
14. Rollhauser C, Johnson M, Al-Kawas FH. Needle-knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a selected population. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 691-696
15. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
16. Leemis LM, Trivedi KS. A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. Am Stat 1996; 50: 63-68
17. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of 11 methods. Stat Med 1998; 17: 873-890
18. Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Gerke H et al. Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type precut papillotome to achieve bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 689-695
19. Huibregtse K, Katon RM, Tytgat GNJ. Precut papillotomy via fine needle-knife papillotomy: a safe and effective technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 403-405
20. Cotton PB. Precut papillotomy: a risky technique for experts only. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 578-579
21. Fogel EL, Eversman D, Jamidar P et al. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 280-285
22. Tarnasky PR, Palesch YY, Cunningham JT et al. Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 1518-1524
23. Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF et al. Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 291-294