Poly(glycoamidoamine)s: A broad class of carbohydrate-containing polycations for nucleic acid delivery

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 443-453

  Ingle, Nilesh P ^a   Malone, Brett ^b   Reineke, Theresa M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Techulon Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR INTERNALIZATION; CULTURED CELL; DELIVERY VEHICLE; EXTRACELLULAR; NONVIRAL; POLYCATIONS; POLYPLEXES; PRIMARY CELLS; STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS;

BIOMOLECULES; CARBOHYDRATES; CELL CULTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION;

NUCLEIC ACIDS;

CARBOHYDRATE; NITROGEN; NUCLEIC ACID; POLY(ADIPAMIDOPENTAETHYLENETETRAMINE); POLY(DEXTRO MANNARAMIDOAMINE); POLY(DEXTROGLUCARAMIDOAMINE); POLY(GALACTARAMIDOAMINE); POLY(GLYCOAMIDOAMINE); POLY(OXALAMIDOPENTAETHYLENEHEXAMINE); POLY(SUCCINAMIDOPENTAETHYLENETETRAMINE); POLY(TARTARAMIDOAMINE); POLYCATION; POLYMER; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL CULTURE; CYTOTOXICITY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RELEASE; GENE EXPRESSION; HELA CELL; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

ANIMALS; CARBOHYDRATES; CELL LINE; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PHARMACEUTICAL VEHICLES; POLYAMINES; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 80051796656     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.04.012     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Oh Y.-K., Park T.G. siRNA delivery systems for cancer treatment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009, 61:850-862.
2. Alvarez-Salas L.M. Nucleic acids as therapeutic agents. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8:1379-1404.
3. Debus H., et al. Delivery of messenger RNA using poly(ethylene imine)-poly(ethylene glycol)-copolymer blends for polyplex formation: biophysical characterization and in vitro transfection properties. J. Control. Release 2010, 148:334-343.
4. Rajendran L., et al. Subcellular targeting strategies for drug design and delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9:29-42.
5. Gao K., Huang L. Nonviral methods for siRNA delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 6:651-658.
6. Tarahovsky Y. Cell transfection by DNA-lipid complexes-lipoplexes. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2009, 74:1293-1304.
7. McLendon P.M., et al. Poly(glycoamidoamine) vehicles promote pDNA uptake through multiple routes and efficient gene expression via caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7:738-750.
8. Herringson T.P., et al. Targeting of plasmid DNA-lipoplexes to cells with molecules anchored via a metal chelator lipid. J. Gene Med. 2009, 11:1048-1063.
9. Geusens B., et al. Ultradeformable cationic liposomes for delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) into human primary melanocytes. J. Control. Release 2009, 133:214-220.
10. Rao N.M. Cationic lipid-mediated nucleic acid delivery: beyond being cationic. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2010, 163:245-252.
11. Lu J.J., et al. A novel mechanism is involved in cationic lipid-mediated functional siRNA delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2009, 6:763-771.
12. De Laporte L., et al. Local gene delivery from ECM-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) multiple channel bridges after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2361-2368.
13. Cohen R.N., et al. Quantification of plasmid DNA copies in the nucleus after lipoplex and polyplex transfection. J. Control. Release 2009, 135:166-174.
14. Wolff J.A., Budker V. The mechanism of naked DNA uptake and expression. Advances in Genetics 2005, 1-20. Academic Press. M.-C.H. Leaf Huang, W. Ernst (Eds.).
15. Gratton S.E.A., et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:11613-11618.
16. Srinivasachari S., et al. Effects of trehalose click polymer length on pDNA complex stability and delivery efficacy. Biomaterials 2007, 28:2885-2898.
17. Liu Y., Reineke T.M. Hydroxyl stereochemistry and amine number within poly(glycoamidoamine)s affect intracellular DNA delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127:3004-3015.
18. Popielarski S.R., et al. Structural effects of carbohydrate-containing polycations on gene delivery. 3. Cyclodextrin type and functionalization. Bioconjug. Chem. 2003, 14:672-678.
19. Shcharbin D., et al. How to study dendriplexes I: characterization. J. Control. Release 2009, 135:186-197.
20. Prevette L.E., et al. Deciphering the role of hydrogen bonding in enhancing pDNA-polycation interactions. Langmuir 2007, 23:9773-9784.
21. Bartlett D.W., Davis M.E. Physicochemical and biological characterization of targeted, nucleic acid-containing nanoparticles. Bioconjug. Chem. 2007, 18:456-468.
22. Lai E., van Zanten J.H. Monitoring DNA/poly-l-lysine polyplex formation with time-resolved multiangle laser light scattering. Biophys. J. 2001, 80:864-873.
23. Li C., et al. PAMAM nanoparticles promote acute lung injury by inducing autophagic cell death through the Akt-TSC2-mTOR signaling pathway. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 1:37-45.
24. Aberle A.M., et al. The counterion influence on cationic lipid-mediated transfection of plasmid DNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1299:281-283.
25. Asgatay S., et al. Polynorbornene polycationic polymers as gene transfer agents: influence of the counterion for in vitro transfection. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 285:121-133.
26. Lee C.-C., et al. General structure-activity relationship for poly(glycoamidoamine)s: the effect of amine density on cytotoxicity and DNA delivery efficiency. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19:428-440.
27. Vicennati P., et al. Polyethylenimine in medicinal chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15:2826-2839.
28. Fischer D., et al. A novel non-viral vector for DNA delivery based on low molecular weight, branched polyethylenimine: effect of molecular weight on transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity. Pharm. Res. 1999, 16:1273-1279.
29. Godbey W.T., et al. Size matters: molecular weight affects the efficiency of poly(ethylenimine) as a gene delivery vehicle. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1999, 45:268-275.
30. Huang M., et al. Transfection efficiency of chitosan vectors: effect of polymer molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. J. Control. Release 2005, 106:391-406.
31. Liu Y., Reineke T.M. Degradation of poly(glycoamidoamine) DNA delivery vehicles: polyamide hydrolysis at physiological conditions promotes DNA release. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:316-325.
32. Liu Y., et al. New poly(d-glucaramidoamine)s induce DNA nanoparticle formation and efficient gene delivery into mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126:7422-7423.
33. Reineke T.M. Poly(glycoamidoamine)s: cationic glycopolymers for DNA delivery. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44:6895-6908.
34. McLendon P.M., et al. Interaction of poly(glycoamidoamine) DNA delivery vehicles with cell-surface glycosaminoglycans leads to polyplex internalization in a manner not solely dependent on charge. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7:1757-1768.
35. Bryson J. Novel twist on primary cell transfection. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. News 2010, 30.
36. Liu Y., Reineke T.M. Poly(glycoamidoamine)s for gene delivery: stability of polyplexes and efficacy with cardiomyoblast cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 2006, 17:101-108.
37. Srinivasachari S., Reineke T.M. Versatile supramolecular pDNA vehicles via 'click polymerization' of [beta]-cyclodextrin with oligoethyleneamines. Biomaterials 2009, 30:928-938.
38. Srinivasachari S., et al. Polycationic β-cyclodextrin 'click clusters': monodisperse and versatile scaffolds for nucleic acid delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130:4618-4627.
39. Carr L.R., Jiang S. Mediating high levels of gene transfer without cytotoxicity via hydrolytic cationic ester polymers. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4186-4193.
40. Reynolds A., et al. Rational siRNA design for RNA interference. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:326-330.
41. Boussif O., et al. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:7297-7301.
42. Blacklock J., et al. DNA release dynamics from bioreducible layer-by-layer films. Langmuir 2010, 26:8597-8605.
43. Prevette L.E., et al. Amide spacing influences pDNA binding of poly(amidoamine)s. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:326-332.
44. Prevette L.E., et al. Correlation of amine number and pDNA binding mechanism for trehalose-based polycations. Langmuir 2008, 24:8090-8101.
45. Kizjakina K., Reineke Theresa M. Effects of secondary amine number in trehalose click polymers for transfection. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2007, 96:646.
46. Srinivasachari S., et al. Trehalose click polymers inhibit nanoparticle aggregation and promote pDNA delivery in serum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128:8176-8184.
47. Taori V.P., et al. DNA delivery in vitro via surface release from multilayer assemblies with poly(glycoamidoamine)s. Acta Biomat. 2009, 5:925-933.
48. Liu Y., et al. Gene delivery with novel poly(l-tartaramidoamine)s. Polymeric Drug Delivery I 2006, American Chemical Society, pp. 217-227.
49. Reineke T.M., Davis M.E. Structural Effects of Carbohydrate-Containing Polycations on Gene Delivery. 1. Carbohydrate Size and Its Distance from Charge Centers. Bioconj. Chem. 2002, 14:247-254.
50. Bryson, J.M., et al. Polymer beacons for luminescence and magnetic resonance imaging of DNA delivery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
51. Bryson J.M., et al. A β-Cyclodextrin " Click Cluster" Decorated with Seven Paramagnetic Chelates Containing Two Water Exchange Sites. Bioconj. Chem. 2008, 19:1505-1509.
52. Lucas R.L., et al. Comparison of a Tartaric Acid Derived Polymeric MRI Contrast Agent to a Small Molecule Model Chelate. Bioconj. Chem. 2007, 19:24-27.
53. Reineke T.M., Davis M.E. Structural Effects of Carbohydrate-Containing Polycations on Gene Delivery. 2. Charge Center Type. Bioconj. Chem. 2002, 14:255-261.
54. Heidel J.D., et al. Administration in non-human primates of escalating intravenous doses of targeted nanoparticles containing ribonucleotidereductase subunit M2 siRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:5715-5721.
55. Pun S.H., et al. Cyclodextrin-Modified Polyethylenimine Polymers for Gene Delivery. Bioconj. Chem. 2004, 15:831-840.
56. Arima H., et al. Enhancement of Gene Expression by Polyamidoamine Dendrimer Conjugates with α-,β-, and γ-Cyclodextrins. Bioconj. Chem. 2001, 12:476-484.
57. Cryan S.-A., et al. Cell transfection with polycationic cyclodextrin vectors. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 21:625-633.
58. Davis M.E., et al. Self-Assembling Nucleic Acid Delivery Vehicles via Linear, Water-Soluble, Cyclodextrin-Containing Polymers. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11:179-197.
59. Hwang S.J., et al. Effects of Structure of β-Cyclodextrin-Containing Polymers on Gene Delivery. Bioconj. Chem. 2001, 12:280-290.
60. Díaz-Moscoso, A., et al. Insights in cellular uptake mechanisms of pDNA-polycationic amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles (CDplexes). J. Control. Release, in press, corrected proof.
61. Lee C.-C., et al. A Polycation Scaffold Presenting Tunable " Click" Sites: Conjugation to Carbohydrate Ligands and Examination of Hepatocyte-Targeted pDNA Delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 2010, 10:585-598.
62. Kim T.-H., et al. Chemical modification of chitosan as a gene carrier in vitro and in vivo. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32:726-753.
63. Jiang H.-L., et al. Galactosylatedpoly(ethylene glycol)-chitosan-graft-polyethylenimine as a gene carrier for hepatocyte-targeting. J. Control. Release 2008, 131:150-157.
64. Dehousse V., et al. Comparison of chitosan/siRNA and trimethylchitosan/siRNA complexes behaviour in vitro. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 46:342-349.
65. Takeda Y., et al. Ternary Complex Consisting of DNA, Polycation, and a Natural Polysaccharide of Schizophyllan to Induce Cellular Uptake by Antigen Presenting Cells. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1178-1186.
66. Eshita Y., et al. Mechanism of Introduction of Exogenous Genes into Cultured Cells Using DEAE-Dextran-MMA Graft Copolymer as Non-Viral Gene Carrier. Molecules 2009, 14:2669-2683.
67. Nimesh S., et al. Novel polyallylamine-dextran sulfate-DNA nanoplexes: Highly efficient non-viral vector for gene delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 320:143-149.
68. Kang H.C., et al. Trafficking microenvironmentalpHs of polycationic gene vectors in drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3071-3078.
69. O'Rorke S., et al. Non-viral polyplexes: Scaffold mediated delivery for gene therapy. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35:441-458.
70. Shim M.S., Kwon Y.J. Acid-transforming polypeptide micelles for targeted nonviral gene delivery. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3404-3413.
71. Vachutinsky, Y., et al. Antiangiogenic gene therapy of experimental pancreatic tumor by sFlt-1 plasmid DNA carried by RGD-modified crosslinked polyplex micelles. J. Control. Release, in press, corrected proof.
72. Zhang, H. and Vinogradov, S.V. Short biodegradable polyamines for gene delivery and transfection of brain capillary endothelial cells. J. Control. Release, in press, corrected proof.
73. Zhang J., et al. Host-Guest Interaction Mediated Polymeric Assemblies: Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Drug and Gene Delivery. ACS Nano 2010, 4:1049-1059.
74. Sizovs A., et al. Carbohydrate polymers for nonviral nucleic acid delivery. Nucleic Acid Transfection 2010, 131-190. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. W. Bielke, C. Erbacher (Eds.).
75. Agarwal, S., et al. (2010) Synthetic Route and Characterization of Main Chain Ester-Containing Hydrolytically Degradable Poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)-Based Polycations. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 9999, NA.
76. Filippov, S.K., et al. (2010) Effect of Hydrophobic Interactions on Properties and Stability of DNA-Polyelectrolyte Complexes. Langmuir.
77. Ma M., et al. Influence of hydroxyl groups on the biological properties of cationic polymethacrylates as gene vectors. ActaBiomaterialia 2010, 6:2658-2665.
78. Schallon A., et al. Performance of three PDMAEMA-based polycation architectures as gene delivery agents in comparison to linear and branched PEI. React. Funct. Polym. 2010, 70:1-10.