Notch signalling stabilises boundary formation at the midbrain-hindbrain organiser

Development

Volumn 138, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 3745-3757

  Tossell, Kyoko ^a,d   Kiecker, Clemens ^b   Wizenmann, Andrea ^c   Lang, Emily ^a   Irving, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^d HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chick; Midbrain hindbrain boundary; Notch signalling; Organiser

Indexed keywords

CELL MARKER; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 8; NOTCH RECEPTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GBX2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR LFNG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR OTX2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN REGION; CELL ADHESION; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL SELECTION; CEREBELLUM; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; MESENCEPHALON; METENCEPHALON; MIDBRAIN HINDBRAIN BOUNDARY; NEUROEPITHELIUM; NEUROMERE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RHOMBENCEPHALON; RHOMBOMERE 1; RHOMBOMERE 2; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TECTUM;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; IN SITU NICK-END LABELING; MESENCEPHALON; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 80051499185     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: 14779129     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.070318     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Amoyel, M., Cheng, Y.-C., Jiang, Y.-J. and Wilkinson, D. G. (2005). Wnt1 regulates neurogenesis and mediates lateral inhibition of boundary cell specification in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 132, 775-785.
2. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D. and Lake, R. J. (1999). Notch signalling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284, 770-776.
3. Babcock, B., Anderson, B. W., Papayannopoulos, I., Castilleja, A., Murray, J. L., Stifani, S., Kudelka, A. P., Wharton, J. T. and Ioannides, C. G. (1998). Ovarian and breast cytotoxic T lymphocytes can recognize peptides from the amino enhancer of split protein of the Notch complex. Mol. Immunol. 35, 1121-1133
4. Bray, S. and Furriols, M. (2001). Notch pathway: making sense of suppressor of hairless. Curr. Biol. 11, R217-R221.
5. Broccoli, V., Boncinelli, E. and Wurst, W. (1999). The caudal limit of Otx2 expression positions the isthmic organizer. Nature 401, 164-168.
6. Bruckner, K., Perez, L., Clausen, H. and Cohen, S. (2000). Glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe modulates Notch-Delta interactions. Nature 406, 411-415.
7. Chen, F., Yu, G., Arawaka, S., Nishimura, M., Kawarai, T., Yu, H., Tandon, A., Supala, A., Song, Y. Q., Rogaeva, E. et al. (2001). Nicastrin binds to membrane-tethered Notch. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 751-754.
8. Chen, J., Kang, L. and Zhang, N. (2005). Negative feedback loop formed by Lunatic fringe and Hes7 controls their oscillatory expression during somitogenesis. Genesis 43, 196-204.
9. Cheng, Y. C., Amoyel, M., Qiu, X., Jiang, Y. J., Xu, Q. and Wilkinson, D. G. (2004). Notch activation regulates the segregation and differentiation of rhombomere boundary cells in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev. Cell 6, 539-550.
10. Chi, C. L., Martinez, S., Wurst, W. and Martin, G. R. (2003). The isthmic organizer signal FGF8 is required for cell survival in the prospective midbrain and cerebellum. Development 130, 2633-2644.
11. Cole, S. E., Levorse, J. M., Tilghman, S. M. and Vogt, T. F. (2002). Clock regulatory elements control cyclic expression of Lunatic fringe during somitogenesis. Dev. Cell 3, 75-84.
12. Cooke, J. E. and Moens, C. B. (2002). Boundary formation in the hindbrain: Eph only it were simple. Trends Neurosci. 25, 260-267
13. Couso, J. P., Knust, E. and Martinez Arias, A. (1995). Serrate and wingless cooperate to induce vestigial gene expression and wing formation in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 5, 1437-1448.
14. Crossley, P. H., Martinez, S. and Martin, G. R. (1996). Midbrain development induced by FGF8 in the chick embryo. Nature 380, 66-68.
15. Dale, J. K., Maroto, M., Dequeant, M. L., Malapert, P., McGrew, M. and Pourquie, O. (2003). Periodic notch inhibition by lunatic fringe underlies the chick segmentation clock. Nature 421, 275-278.
16. Davenne, M., Maconochie, M. K., Neun, R., Pattyn, A., Chambon, P., Krumlauf, R. and Rijli, F. M. (1999). Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 control dorsoventral patterns of neuronal development in the rostral hindbrain. Neuron 22, 677-691.
17. de Celis, J. F. and Bray, S. (1997). Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. Development 124, 3241-3251.
18. de Celis, J. F., Garcia-Bellido, A. and Bray, S. J. (1996). Activation and function of Notch at the dorsal-ventral boundary of the wing imaginal disc. Development 122, 359-369.
19. Dominguez, M. and de Celis, J. F. (1998). A dorsal/ventral boundary established by Notch controls growth and polarity in the Drosophila eye. Nature 396, 276-278.
20. Fior, R. and Henrique, D. (2005). A novel hes5/hes6 circuitry of negative regulation controls Notch activity during neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 281, 318-333.
21. Fleming, R. J. (1998). Structural conservation of Notch receptors and ligands. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 599-607.
22. Fleming, R. J., Gu, Y. and Hukriede, N. A. (1997). Serrate-mediated activation of Notch is specifically blocked by the product of the gene fringe in the dorsal compartment of the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. Development 124, 2973-2981.
23. Fraser, S., Keynes, R. and Lumsden, A. (1990). Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431-435.
24. Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P. and Morata, G. (1973). Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nat. New Biol. 245, 51-253.
25. Geling, A., Steiner, H., Willem, M., Bally-Cuif, L. and Haass, C. (2002). A gamma-secretase inhibitor blocks Notch signaling in vivo and causes a severe neurogenic phenotype in zebrafish. EMBO Rep. 3, 688-694.
26. Glavic, A., Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. and Mayor, R. (2002). The homeoprotein Xiro1 is required for midbrain-hindbrain boundary formation. Development 129, 1609-1621.
27. Gurdon, J. B., Lemaire, P. and Kato, K. (1993). Community effects and related phenomena in development. Cell 75, 831-834.
28. Guthrie, S. and Lumsden, A. (1991). Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain. Development 112, 221-229.
29. Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1992). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev. Dyn. 195, 231-272.
30. Henrique, D., Adam, J., Myat, A., Chitnis, A., Lewis, J. and Ish-Horowicz, D. (1995). Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375, 787-790.
31. Hidalgo-Sanchez, M., Millet, S., Simeone, A. and Alvarado-Mallart, R. M. (1999). Comparative analysis of Otx2, Gbx2, Pax2, Fgf8 and Wnt1 gene expressions during the formation of the chick midbrain/hindbrain domain. Mech. Dev. 81, 175-178.
32. Hukriede, N. A., Gu, Y. and Fleming, R. J. (1997). A dominant-negative form of Serrate acts as a general antagonist of Notch activation. Development 124, 3427-3437.
33. Irving, C. and Mason, I. (2000). Signalling by FGF8 from the isthmus patterns anterior hindbrain and establishes the anterior limit of Hox gene expression. Development 127, 177-186.
34. Irving, C., Malhas, A., Guthrie, S. and Mason, I. (2002). Establishing the trochlear motor axon trajectory: role of the isthmic organiser and Fgf8. Development 129, 5389-5398.
35. Johnston, S. H., Rauskolb, C., Wilson, R., Prabhakaran, B., Irvine, K. D. and Vogt, T. F. (1997). A family of mammalian Fringe genes implicated in boundary determination and the Notch pathway. Development 124, 2245-2254.
36. Jouve, C., Palmeirim, I., Henrique, D., Beckers, J., Gossler, A., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Pourquie, O. (2000). Notch signalling is required for cyclic expression of the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm. Development 127, 1421-1429.
37. Jouve, C., Iimura, T. and Pourquie, O. (2002). Onset of the segmentation clock in the chick embryo: evidence for oscillations in the somite precursors in the primitive streak. Development 129, 1107-1117.
38. Jungbluth, S., Larsen, C., Wizenmann, A. and Lumsden, A. (2001). Cell mixing between the embryonic midbrain and hindbrain. Curr. Biol. 11, 204-207.
39. Katahira, T., Sato, T., Sugiyama, S., Okafuji, T., Araki, I., Funahashi, J. and Nakamura, H. (2000). Interaction between Otx2 and Gbx2 defines the organizing center for the optic tectum. Mech. Dev. 91, 43-52.
40. Kiecker, C. and Lumsden, A. (2005). Compartments and their boundaries in vertebrate brain development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 553-564.
41. Kim, J., Irvine, K. D. and Carroll, S. B. (1995). Cell recognition, signal nduction, and symmetrical gene activation at the dorsal-ventral boundary of the developing Drosophila wing. Cell 82, 795-802.
42. Lai, E. C. (2004). Notch signaling: control of cell communication and cell fate. Development 131, 965-973.
43. Langenberg, T. and Brand, M. (2005). Lineage restriction maintains a stable organizer cell population at the zebrafish midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Development 132, 3209-3216.
44. Laufer, E., Dahn, R., Orozco, O. E., Yeo, C. Y., Pisenti, J., Henrique, D., Abbott, U. K., Fallon, J. F. and Tabin, C. (1997). Expression of Radical fringe in limb-bud ectoderm regulates apical ectodermal ridge formation. Nature 386, 366-373.
45. le Roux, I., Lewis, J. and Ish-Horowicz, D. (2003). Notch activity is required to maintain floorplate identity and to control neurogenesis in the chick hindbrain and spinal cord. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47, 263-272.
46. Li J. Y. and Joyner A. L. (2001). Otx2 and Gbx2 are required for refinement and not induction of mid-hindbrain gene expression. Development 128, 4979-4991.
47. Louvi, A. and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (2006). Notch signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 93-102.
48. Mahmood, R., Kiefer, P., Guthrie, S., Dickson, C. and Mason, I. (1995). Multiple roles for FGF-3 during cranial neural development in the chicken. Development 121, 1399-1410.
49. Major, R. J. and Irvine, K. D. (2005). Influence of Notch on dorsoventral compartmentalization and actin organization in the Drosophila wing. Development 132, 3823-3833.
50. Major, R. J. and Irvine, K. D. (2006). Localization and requirement for Myosin II at the dorsal-ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. Dev. Dyn. 235, 3051-3058.
51. Marin, F. and Puelles, L. (1994). Patterning of the embryonic avian midbrain after experimental inversions: a polarizing activity from the isthmus. Dev. Biol. 163, 19-37.
52. Martinez, S., Marin, F., Nieto, M. A. and Puelles, L. (1995). Induction of ectopic engrailed expression and fate change in avian rhombomeres: intersegmental boundaries as barriers. Mech. Dev. 51, 289-303.
53. Martinez-Barbera, J. P., Signore, M., Boyl, P. P., Puelles, E., Acampora, D., Gogoi, R., Schubert, F., Lumsden, A. and Simeone, A. (2001). Regionalisation of anterior neuroectoderm and its competence in responding to forebrain and midbrain inducing activities depend on mutual antagonism between OTX2 and GBX2. Development 128, 4789-4800.
54. Micchelli, C. A. and Blair, S. S. (1999). Dorsoventral lineage restriction in wing imaginal discs requires Notch. Nature 401, 473-476.
55. Miele, L. and Osborne, B. (1999). Arbiter of differentiation and death: Notch signaling meets apoptosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 181, 393-409.
56. Milan, M., Weihe, U., Perez, L. and Cohen, S. M. (2001). The LRR proteins capricious and Tartan mediate cell interactions during DV boundary formation in the Drosophila wing. Cell 106, 785-794.
57. Milan, M., Perez, L. and Cohen, S. M. (2005). Boundary formation in the Drosophila wing: functional dissection of Capricious and Tartan. Dev. Dyn. 233, 804-810.
58. Millet, S., Bloch-Gallego, E., Simeone, A. and Alvarado-Mallart, R. M. (1996a). The caudal limit of Otx2 gene expression as a marker of the midbrain/hindbrain boundary: a study using in situ hybridisation and chick/quailhomotopic grafts. Development 122, 3785-3797.
59. Millet, S., Bloch-Gallego, E., Simeone, A. and Alvarado-Mallart, R. M. (1996b). The caudal limit of Otx2 gene expression as a marker of the midbrain/hindbrain boundary: a study using in situ hybridisation and chick/quail homotopic grafts. Development 122, 3785-3797.
60. Millet, S., Campbell, K., Epstein, D. J., Losos, K., Harris, E. and Joyner, A. L. (1999). A role for Gbx2 in repression of Otx2 and positioning the mid/hindbrain organizer. Nature 401, 161-164.
61. Moloney, D. J., Panin, V. M., Johnston, S. H., Chen, J., Shao, L., Wilson, R., Wang, Y., Stanley, P., Irvine, K. D., Haltiwanger, R. S. et al. (2000). Fringe is glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature 406, 369-375.
62. Morales, A. V., Yasuda, Y. and Ish-Horowicz, D. (2002). Periodic Lunatic fringe expression is controlled during segmentation by a cyclic transcriptional enhancer responsive to notch signaling. Dev. Cell 3, 63-74.
63. Myat, A., Henrique, D., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Lewis, J. (1996). A chick homologue of Serrate and its relationship with Notch and Delta homologues during central neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 174, 233-247.
64. Pan, Y., Lin, M. H., Tian, X., Cheng, H. T., Gridley, T., Shen, J. and Kopan, R. (2004). gamma-secretase functions through Notch signaling to maintain skin appendages but is not required for their patterning or initial morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 7, 731-743.
65. Panin, V. M., Papayannopoulos, V., Wilson, R. and Irvine, K. D. (1997). Fringe modulates Notch-ligand interactions. Nature 387, 908-912.
66. Rampal, R., Li, A. S., Moloney, D. J., Georgiou, S. A., Luther, K. B., Nita-Lazar, A. and Haltiwanger, R. S. (2005). Lunatic fringe, manic fringe, and radical fringe recognize similar specificity determinants in O-fucosylated epidermal growth factor-like repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 42454-42463.
67. Rauskolb, C., Correia, T. and Irvine, K. D. (1999). Fringe-dependent separation of dorsal and ventral cells in the Drosophila wing. Nature 401, 476-480.
68. Reifers, F., Bohli, H., Walsh, E. C., Crossley, P. H., Stainier, D. Y. and Brand, M. (1998). Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis. Development 125, 2381-2395.
69. Rhinn, M. and Brand, M. (2001). The midbrain-hindbrain boundary organizer. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 34-42.
70. Schroeter, E. H., Kisslinger, J. A. and Kopan, R. (1998). Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature 393, 382-386.
71. Shamim, H. and Mason, I. (1999). Expression of Fgf4 during early development of the chick embryo. Mech. Dev. 85, 189-192.
72. Shamim, H., Mahmood, R., Logan, C., Doherty, P., Lumsden, A. and Mason, I. (1999). Sequential roles for Fgf4, En1 and Fgf8 in specification and regionalisation of the midbrain. Development 126, 945-959.
73. Sugiyama, S., Funahashi, J. and Nakamura, H. (2000). Antagonizing activity of chick Grg4 against tectum-organizing activity. Dev. Biol. 221, 168-180.
74. Sunmonu, N. A., Li, K., Guo, Q. and Li, J. Y. (2011). Gbx2 and Fgf8 are sequentially required for formation of the midbrain-hindbrain compartment boundary. Development 138, 725-734.
75. Takke, C. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1999). her1, a zebrafish pair-rule like gene, acts downstream of notch signalling to control somite development. Development 126, 3005-3014.
76. Tossell, K., Andreae, L. C., Cudmore, C., Lang, E., Muthukrishnan, U., Lumsden, A., Gilthorpe, J. D. and Irving, C. (2011). Lrrn1 is required for formation of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and organiser through regulation of affinity differences between midbrain and hindbrain cells in chick. Dev. Biol. 352, 341-352.
77. Trokovic, R., Jukkola, T., Saarimaki, J., Peltopuro, P., Naserke, T., Weisenhorn, D. M., Trokovic, N., Wurst, W. and Partanen, J. (2005). Fgfr1- dependent boundary cells between developing mid- and hindbrain. Dev. Biol. 278, 428-439.
78. Van de Walle, I., De Smet, G., Gartner, M., De Smedt, M., Waegemans, E., Vandekerckhove, B., Leclercq, G., Plum, J., Aster, J. C., Bernstein, I. D. et al. (2011). Jagged2 acts as a Delta-like Notch ligand during early ematopoietic cell fate decisions. Blood 117, 4449-4459.
79. Wassarman, K. M., Lewandoski, M., Campbell, K., Joyner, A. L., Rubenstein, J. L., Martinez, S. and Martin, G. R. (1997). Specification of the anterior hindbrain and establishment of a normal mid/hindbrain organizer is dependent on Gbx2 gene function. Development 124, 2923-2934.
80. Wizenmann, A. and Lumsden, A. (1997). Segregation of rhombomeres by differential chemoaffinity. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 448-459.
81. Wu, J. Y. and Rao, Y. (1999). Fringe: defining borders by regulating the notch pathway. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 537-543.
82. Wurst, W. and Bally-Cuif, L. (2001). Neural plate patterning: upstream and downstream of the isthmic organizer. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 99-108.
83. Ye, W., Bouchard, M., Stone, D., Liu, X., Vella, F., Lee, J., Nakamura, H., Ang, S. L., Busslinger, M. and Rosenthal, A. (2001). Distinct regulators control the expression of the mid-hindbrain organizer signal FGF8. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 1175-1181.
84. Yeo, S. Y., Kim, M., Kim, H. S., Huh, T. L. and Chitnis, A. B. (2007). Fluorescent protein expression driven by her4 regulatory elements reveals the spatiotemporal pattern of Notch signaling in the nervous system of zebrafish embryos. Dev. Biol. 301, 555-567.
85. Zeltser, L. M., Larsen, C. W. and Lumsden, A. (2001). A new developmental compartment in the forebrain regulated by Lunatic fringe. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 683-64.
86. Zervas, M., Millet, S., Ahn, S. and Joyner, A. L. (2004). Cell behaviors and genetic lineages of the mesencephalon and rhombomere 1. Neuron 43, 345-357.