The effect of orthographic uniqueness and deviation points on lexical decisions: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56 A, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 287-307

  Lindell, Annukka K ^a   Nicholls, Michael E R ^a   Castles, Anne E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL FIELD;

BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL FIELDS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0037313449     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000341     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anstis, S.M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14, 589-592.
2. Balota, D.A., & Chumbley, J.I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 340-357.
3. Balota, D.A., & Chumbley, J.I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or pronunciation? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89-106.
4. Banich, M.T., & Belger, A. (1990). Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex, 26(1), 77-94.
5. Baynes, K., Wessinger, C.M., Fendrich, R., & Gazzaniga, M.S. (1995). The emergence of the capacity to name left visual field stimuli in a callosotomy patient: Implications for functional plasticity. Neuropsychohgia, 33, 1225-1242.
6. Brand, N., van Bekkum, I., Stumpel, M., & Kroeze, J. (1983). Word matching and lexical decisions: A visual half-field study. Brain and Language, 18, 199-211.
7. Broca, P. (1865). Sur la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 6, 493-494.
8. Bryden, M.P. (1970). Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition as a function of familiarity and pattern orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84(1), 120-122.
9. Bub, D.N., & Lewine, J. (1988). Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 33, 161-188.
10. Chiarello, C. (1988a). Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: A review of visual half-field research. In H.A. Whitaker (Ed.), Contemporary reviews in neuropsychology (pp. 36-76). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Chiarello, C. (1988b). Right hemisphere contributions to lexical semantics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Chiarello, C., Dronkers, N.F., & Hardyck, C. (1984). Choosing sides: On the variability of language lateralization in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 22, 363-374.
13. Chiarello, C., Maxfield, L., Richards, L., & Kahan, T. (1995). Activation of lexical codes for simultaneously presented words: Modulation of attention and pathway strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2/(4), 776-808.
14. Chiarello, C., & Nuding, S. (1987). Visual field effects for processing content and function words. Neuropsychohgia, 25(3), 539-548.
15. Chiarello, C., Nuding, S., & Pollock, A. (1988). Lexical decisions and naming asymmetries: Influence of response selection and response bias. Brain & Language, 34, 302-314.
16. Chiarello, C., Senehi, J., & Soulier, M. (1986). Viewing conditions and hemisphere asymmetry for lexical decision. Neuropsychologia, 24, 521-529.
17. Coslett, H.B., & Saffran, E.M. (1998). Reading and the right hemisphere: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 105-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Day, J. (1977). Right-hemisphere language processing in normal right-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(3), 518-528.
19. Denenberg, V.H. (1980). General systems theory, brain organization, and early experiences. American Journal of Physiology, 238, 3-13.
20. Duchek, J.M., & Neely, J.H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequency levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks. Memory and Cognition, 17(2), 148-162.
21. Ellis, A.W., Young, A.W., & Anderson, C. (1988). Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 35, 254-273.
22. Eng, T.L., & Hellige, J.B. (1994). Hemispheric asymmetry for processing unpronounceable and pronounceable letter trigrams. Brain and Language, 46, 517-535.
23. Eviatar, Z. (1999). Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords. Neuropsychology, 13(4), 498-515.
24. Faust, M., Babkoff, H., & Kravetz, S. (1995). Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: Implications for modularity vs. interactionism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 171-192.
25. Frederiksen, J.R., & Kroll, J.F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361-379.
26. Gazzaniga, M.S. (1983). Right hemisphere language following brain bisection. American Psychologist, 38(5), 525-537.
27. Gazzaniga, M.S., LeDoux, J.E., & Wilson, D.H. (1977). Language, praxis and the right hemisphere: Clues to some mechanisms of consciousness. Neurology, 27, 1144-1147.
28. Gill, K.M., & McKeever, W.F. (1974). Word length and exposure time effects on the recognition of bilaterally presented words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 173-175.
29. Goodman, J.C., & Huttenlocher, J. (1988). Do we know how people identify spoken words? Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 684-698.
30. Hellige, J.B., Cowin, E.L., & Eng, T.L. (1995). Recognition of CVC syllables from LVF, RVF and central locations: Hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 258-266.
31. Hellige, J.B., Taylor, A.K., & Eng, T.L. (1989). Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 711-722.
32. Hellige, J.B., & Yamauchi, M. (1999). Quantitative and qualitative hemispheric asymmetry for processing Japanese kana. Brain and Cognition, 40, 453-463.
33. Howell, J.R., & Bryden, M.P. (1987). The effects of word orientation and imageability on visual half-field presentations with a lexical decision task. Neuropsychologia, 25(3), 527-538.
34. Iacoboni, M., & Zaidel, E. (1996). Hemispheric independence in word recognition: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations. Brain and Language, 53, 121-140.
35. James, C.T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 130-136.
36. Joanette, Y., & Goulet, P. (1986). Criterion-specific reduction of verbal fluency in right brain-damaged right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 24, 875-879.
37. Knecht, S., Deppe, M., Dräger, B., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Ringelstein, E.B., & Henningsen, H. (2000). Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain, 123, 74-81.
38. Kwantes, P.J., & Mewhort, D.J.K. (1999a). Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 376-381.
39. Kwantes, P.J., & Mewhort, D.J.K. (1999b). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 306-315.
40. Leiber, L. (1976). Lexical decisions in the right and left cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 3, 443-450.
41. Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley.
42. Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M.T., & Burton, L.A. (1983). Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between the hemispheres? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 329-359.
43. Levy, J., & Reid, M. (1978). Variations in cerebral organisation as a function of handedness, hand posture in writing, and sex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 119-144.
44. Liederman, J., Merola, J., & Martinez, S. (1985). Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia, 23(5), 673-683.
45. Loftus, G.R., & Masson, M.E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-493.
46. Luh, K.E., & Levy, J. (1995). Interhemispheric cooperation: Left is left and right is right but sometimes the twain shall meet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1243-1258.
47. Marks, N.L., & Hellige, J.B. (1999). Effects of bilateral stimulation and stimulus redundancy on interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychology, 13(4), 475-487.
48. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
49. Melville, J.R. (1957). Word length as a factor in differential recognition. American journal of Psychology, 70, 316-318.
50. Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Lexical decisions after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 105-124.
51. Myers, P.S., & Linebaugh, C.W. (1981). Comprehension of ideomatic expressions by right hemisphere-damaged adults. In R.H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 254-261). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.
52. Nicholls, M.E.R., & Wood, A.G. (1998). The contribution of attention to the RVF advantage for word recognition. Brain and Cognition, 38, 339-357.
53. Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-133.
54. Patterson, K., & Besner, D. (1984). Is the right hemisphere literate? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1(4), 315-341.
55. Pirrozzolo, F.J., & Rayner, K. (1980). Handedness, hemispheric specialization and saccadic eye movement latencies. Neuropsychologia, 18(2), 225-229.
56. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
57. Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movement latencies for parafoveally presented words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11(1), 13-16.
58. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351-373.
59. Ross, E. (1981). The aprosodias: Functional anatomic organization of the components of language in the right hemisphere. Archives of Neurology, 38, 561-570.
60. Sidtis, J.J., Volpe, B.T., Wilson, D.H., Rayport, M., & Gazzaniga, M.S. (1981). Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: Evidence for a continuum of generative capacity. Journal of Neuroscience, 1, 323-331.
61. Young, A.W., & Ellis, A.W. (1985). Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 24, 326-358.
62. Zaidel, E., & Peters, A.M. (1981). Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: Two case studies. Brain and Language, 14, 205-234.
63. Zaidel, E., & Schweiger, A. (1989). Right hemisphere contributions to lexical access in an aphasic with deep dyslexia. Brain and Language, 27, 73-89.