cis-Regulatory and protein evolution in orthologous and duplicate genes

Genome Research

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1530-1536

  Castillo Davis, Cristian I ^a   Hartl, Daniel L ^a   Achaz, Guillaume ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS BRIGGSAE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; EUKARYOTE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC SELECTION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA, BACTERIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, DUPLICATE; GENOME, BACTERIAL; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; STATISTICS;

CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS BRIGGSAE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 4444242626     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.2662504     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
2. Blencowe, B.J. 2000. Exonic splicing enhancers: Mechanism of action, diversity and role in human genetic diseases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 106-110.
3. Castillo-Davis, C.I. and Hartl, D.L. 2002. Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 728-735.
4. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. 1998. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: A platform for investigating biology. Science 282: 2012-2018.
5. Conant, G.C. and Wagner, A. 2003. Asymmetric sequence divergence of duplicate genes. Genome Res. 13: 2052-2058.
6. Dayhoff, M.O., Eck, R.V., and Park, C.M. 1972. A model of evolutionary change in protein sequences. In Atlas of protein sequence and structure, pp. 89-99, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
7. Dunn, K.A., Bielawski, J.P., and Yang, Z. 2001. Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: Implications for translational selection. Genetics 157: 295-305.
8. Duret, L. and Mouchiroud, D. 1999. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 4482-4487.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
10. Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F.B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.L., and Postlethwait, J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531-1541.
11. Goldman, N. and Yang, Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 725-736.
12. Gu, Z., Nicolae, D., Lu, H.H., and Li, W.H. 2002. Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data. Trends Genet. 18: 609-613.
13. GuhaThakurta, D., Palomar, L., Stormo, G.D., Tedesco, P., Johnson, T.E., Walker, D.W., Lithgow, G., Kim, S., and Link, C.D. 2002. Identification of a novel cis-regulatory element involved in the heat shock response in Caenorhabditis elegans using microarray gene expression and computational methods. Genome Res. 12: 701-712.
14. Haldane, J.B.S. 1932. The causes of evolution. Longmans and Green, London.
15. Hill, A.A., Hunter, C.P., Tsung, B.T., Tucker-Kellogg, G., and Brown, E.L. 2000. Genomic analysis of gene expression in C. elegans. Science 290: 809-812.
16. Hughes, A.L. 1994. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 256: 119-124.
17. Jareborg, N., Birney, E., and Durbin, R. 1999. Comparative analysis of noncoding regions of 77 orthologous mouse and human gene pairs. Genome Res. 9: 815-824.
18. Kellis, M., Birren, B.W., and Lander, E.S. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428: 617-624.
19. Kim, S.K., Lund, J., Kiraly, M., Duke, K., Jiang, M., Stuart, J.M., Eizinger, A., Wylie, B.N., and Davidson, G.S. 2001. A gene expression map for Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 293: 2087-2092.
20. Koch, M.A., Weisshaar, B., Kroymann, J., Haubold, B., and Mitchell-Olds, T. 2001. Comparative genomics and regulatory evolution: Conservation and function of the Chs and Apetala3 promoters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1882-1891.
21. Kondrashov, F.A., Rogozin, I.B., Wolf, Y.I., and Koonin, E.V. 2002. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. 3: research0008.0001-0008.0009.
22. Ludwig, M.Z., Bergman, C., Patel, N.H., and Kreitman, M. 2000. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 403: 564-567.
23. Lynch, M. and Conery, J.S. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151-1155.
24. Needleman, S.B. and Wunsch, C.D. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48: 443-453.
25. Nembaware, V., Crum, K., Kelso, J., and Seoighe, C. 2002. Impact of the presence of paralogs on sequence divergence in a set of mouse-human orthologs. Genome Res. 12: 1370-1376.
26. Nielsen, R. and Yang, Z. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148: 929-936.
27. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
28. Ohta, T. 1987. Simulating evolution by gene duplication. Genetics 115: 207-213.
29. Shaw, P.J., Wratten, N.S., McGregor, A.P., and Dover, G.A. 2002. Coevolution in bicoid-dependent promoters and the inception of regulatory incompatibilities among species of higher Diptera. Evol. Dev. 4: 265-277.
30. Smith, T.F. and Waterman, M.S. 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147: 195-197.
31. Tatusov, R.L., Koonin, E.V., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278: 631-637.
32. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
33. True, J.R. and Haag, E.S. 2001. Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Dev. 3: 109-119.
34. Wagner, A. 2000. Decoupled evolution of coding region and mRNA expression patterns after gene duplication: Implications for the neutralist-selectionist debate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 6579-6584.
35. Walsh, J.B. 1995. How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics 139: 421-428.
36. Wasserman, W.W., Palumbo, M.,Thompson, W., Fickett, J.W., and Lawrence, C.E. 2000. Human-mouse genome comparisons to locate regulatory sites. Nat. Genet. 26: 225-228.
37. Waterman, M.S. and Eggert, M. 1987. A new algorithm for best subsequence alignments with application to tRNA-rRNA comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 197: 723-728.
38. Wolfe, K.H. and Li, W.H. 2003. Molecular evolution meets the genomics revolution. Nat. Genet 33: 255-265.
39. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 113:555-556.
40. Yang, Z. 2000. Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML), vasion 3.0, http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html