Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance

Language Learning

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 868-903

  Andringa, Sible ^a   de Glopper, Kees ^b   Hacquebord, Hilde ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Classroom research; Explicit and implicit instruction; Explicit and implicit knowledge; Form focused instruction; L1 influence; Second language learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961008218     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00623.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andringa, S. J. (2005). Form-focused instruction and the development of second language proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
2. Authorware. (1999). San Francisco: Macromedia.
3. Bialystok, E. (1989). Psycholinguistic dimensions of second language proficiency. In W. Rutherford & M. A. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 31-50). New York: Newbury House.
4. Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 157-168.
5. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern languages aptitude test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
6. Chaudron, C. (2006). Some reflections on the development of (meta-analytic) synthesis in second language research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 323-339). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Day, E. M., & Shapson, S. M. (2001). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 47-80.
9. De Graaff, R. (1997). Differential effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
10. DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
11. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing in L2 grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533.
13. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (Suppl. 1), 1-25.
15. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
19. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Meta-analysis, human cognition, and language learning. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 301-322). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
20. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558-589.
21. Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 79-114). London: Academic Press.
22. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 1-46.
24. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223-236.
25. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
26. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172.
27. Ellis, R. (2007). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Explicit and implicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
29. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the "Natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51 (1), 1-50.
30. Han, Y., & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 1-23.
31. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 331-359.
32. Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (2005). Investigating instructed second language acquisition. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
33. Hulstijn, J. H. (1999). Vaardigheid zonder kennis? Amsterdam: Vossiuspers AUP.
34. Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193-223.
35. Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129-140.
36. Hulstijn, J. H., & de Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97-112.
37. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
38. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
39. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Lincolnwood, IL: Laredo Publishing.
40. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
41. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1995). On the teaching and learning of grammar: Challenging the myths. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second langauge acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 131-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
43. Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Lightbown, P. M. (2001). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 431-462.
45. Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of the research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359-382.
46. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practise. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356.
48. Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
49. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50 (4), 617-673.
50. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
51. Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436-486). Oxford: Blackwell.
52. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Walker, C. (1987). Some applications of cognitive theory to second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 287-306.
53. Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit learning: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393-419). London: Academic Press.
54. Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
55. Pienemann, M. (1988). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. AILA Review, 5, 40-72.
56. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 233-247.
57. Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47(1), 45-99.
58. Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 113-133). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
59. Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(2), 422-451.
60. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35-78.
61. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
62. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-64). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
63. Schuurs, U. (1999). De ISK-toetsen. Arnhem: CITO.
64. Sharwood Smith, M. A. (1988). Consciousness raising and the second language learner. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 51-60). New York: Newbury House.
65. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2008). The complexities of selecting complex (and simple) forms in instructed SLA research. In A. Housen & F. Kuiken (Eds.), Proceedings of the complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) conference. Belgium: University of Brussels.
67. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 1-46.
68. Van Den Bercken, J. H. L., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2002). Variantieanalyse: De GLM benadering. Groningen: Stenfert Kroese.
69. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. New York: Ablex.
70. VanPatten, B. (2003). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.