Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-23

  Han, Youngju ^a   Ellis, Rod ^b  

^a Youngsan University   (South Korea)

^b CITE ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002045732     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136216889800200102     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C. and Steel, D. 1997: Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research 1, 2: 93-121.
2. Bachman, L. 1990: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. 1982: The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly 16: 449-465.
4. Berko, J. 1958: The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150-177.
5. Berry, D. 1994: Implicit and explicit learning of complex tasks. In Ellis,N., editor, Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
6. Bialystok, E. 1979: Explicit and implicit judgments of L2 grammaticality.Language Learning 29: 81-103.
7. Bialystok, E. 1982: On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics 3: 181-206.
8. Bialystok, E. 1990: The competence of processing: classifying theories of second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 24: 635-648.
9. Bialystok, E. 1994: Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition. In Ellis, N., editor, Implicit and explicit learning of languages, London: Academic Press, 549-569.
10. Birdsong, D. 1989: Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer.
11. Bley-Vroman R. and Masterson, D. 1989: Reaction time as a supplement to grammaticality judgments in the investigation of second language learners' competence. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 8: 207-237.
12. Bolinger, D. 1968: Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2: 119-127.
13. Canale, M. and Swain, M. 1980: Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1: 1-47.
14. Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. 1983: The grammar book. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
15. DeKeyser, R. 1995: Learning second language grammar rules: an experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 379-410.
16. Ellis, N. 1993: Rules and instances in foreign language learning: interactions of implicit and explicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 5: 289-318.
17. Ellis, N., editor, 1994: Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
18. Ellis, R. 1991: Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 161-186.
19. Ellis, R. 1993: Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly 27: 91-113.
20. Ellis, R. 1994: A Theory of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. In Ellis, N., editor, Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press. 79-114.
21. Fotos, S. and Ellis, R. 1991: Communicating about grammar: a task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly 25: 605-628.
22. Goss, N., Ying-Hua, A. and Lantolf, J. 1994: Two heads may be better than one: mental activity in second-language grammaticality judgments. In Gass, S. and Cohen, A., editors, Research methodology in second-language acquisition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263-286.
23. Green, P. and Hecht, K. 1992: Implicit and explicit grammar: an empirical study. Applied Linguistics 13: 168-184.
24. Harley, B., Cummins, J., Swain, M. and Allen, P. 1990: The nature of language proficiency. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. and Swain, M. The Development of Second Language Proficiency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7-25.
25. Hatch, E. and Lazaraton, A. 1991: The research manual: design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
26. Hulstijn, J. and De Graaf, R. 1994: Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review 11: 97-112.
27. Hulstijn, N. and Hulstijn, W. 1984: Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning 34: 23-43.
28. Krashen, S. 1981: Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
29. Mathews, R., Buss, R., Stanley, W., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. and Druhan, B., 1989: Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: a synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 1083-1100.
30. Quirk, R. and Greenbaum, S. 1973: A university grammar of English. London: Longman.
31. Reber, A. 1989: Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 219-235.
32. Richards, J., Platt, J. and Weber, H. 1985: Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London: Longman.
33. Robinson, P. 1996: Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27-67.
34. Rutherford, W. 1987: Second language grammar: learning and teaching. London: Longman.
35. Schmidt, R. 1994: Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review 11: 11-26.
36. Seliger, H. 1979: On the nature and function of language rules in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 13: 359-369.
37. Sharwood-Smith, M. 1981: Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2: 159-168.
38. Sorace, A. 1985: Metalinguistic knowledge and language use in acquisition-poor environments. Applied Linguistics 6: 239-254.