Some reflections on the development of (meta-analytic) synthesis in second language research

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 13, Issue , 2006, Pages 323-339

  Chaudron, Craig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960986726     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Andersen, R. W. (1978). An implicational model for second language research. Language Learning, 28, 221-282.
2. Au, K. H.-P. (1979). Using the experience-text-relationship method with minority children. Reading Teacher, 32, 677-679.
3. Baker, K. A., & de Kanter, A. A. (1981). Effectiveness of bilingual education: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341-382.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. A Supplement to Language Learning, 50.
7. Bedell, D. A. (1993). Cross-cultural variation in choice of language learning strategies: A mainland Chinese investigation with comparison to previous studies. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
8. Bedell, D. A., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Cross-cultural comparisons of language learning strategies in the People's Republic of China and other countries. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-60). Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i.
9. Boraie, D., Kassabgy, O., & Oxford, R. (1994). Empowering teachers and learners: Style and strategy awareness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Baltimore, Maryland.
10. Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647-678.
11. Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319-338.
12. Chamot, A. U.; Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
13. Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33, 343-377.
14. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Chaudron, C. (2003a). Data collection in SLA research. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long, (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 762-828). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16. Chaudron, C. (2003b). Learner strategies. Unpublished review paper commissioned by the Diagnostic Assessment Procedure Project, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu.
17. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. M. (Eds.). (1993). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Fitzgerald, J. (1995a). English-as-a-second language reading instruction in the United States: A research review. Journal of Reading Behavior (now Journal of Literacy Research), 27(2), 115-152
20. Fitzgerald, J. (1995b). English-as-a-second-language learners' cognitive reading processes: A review of research in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 65, 145-190.
21. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
22. Glass, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
23. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
24. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly 29, 2, 261-297.
25. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1980). Vote counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 359-369.
26. Jackson, G. B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50, 438-468.
27. Kasper, G., & Grotjahn, R. (Eds.). (1991). Methods in second language research. Special Issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2).
28. Krashen, S. D. (1977). Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. H. Crymes, (Eds.), On TESOL'77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 144-158). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.
29. Levin, L. (1972). Comparative studies in foreign language teaching. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
30. Light, R. J., & Smith, P. V. (1971). Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving conflicts among different research studies. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 429-471.
31. Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359-382.
32. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-167). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
33. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521.
34. Masgoret, A.-M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 123-163.
35. Menn, L., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (Eds.). (2000). Methods for studying language production. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
37. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, 417-528.
38. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
40. Oxford, R. L., (Ed.). (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i.
41. Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23, 1-23.
42. Redfield, D. L., & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 237-245.
43. Roberts, D. M. (1980). The impact of electronic calculators on educational performance. Review of Educational Research, 50, 71-98.
44. Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 45-73.
45. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46. Smith, P. D. (1970). A comparison of the cognitive and audiolingual approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania Foreign Language project. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.
47. Swanborn, M. S. L., & de Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261-285.
48. Swicegood, M. A. (1990). The effects of metacognitive reading strategy training on the reading performance and student reading analysis strategies of third-grade Spanish-dominant students. Dissertation Abstracts International 52, p. 449A.
49. Watanabe, Y. (1990). External variables affecting language learning strategies of Japanese EFL learners: Effects of entrance examinations, years spent at college/university, and staying overseas. Unpublished master's thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, U.K.
50. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (Eds.). (1999). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: Theory, current research, and instructional implications. Special Issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2).
51. Willig, A. C. (1985). A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research, 55, 269-317.
52. Winne, P. H. (1979). Experiments relating teachers' use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 49, 13-50.
53. Yang, N.-D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use. System 27, 515-535.
54. Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44, 189-219.
55. Zhang, W. (1994). Data on university EFL language use. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.