What's in a grade? the multidimensional nature of what teacher-assigned grades assess in high school

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 141-159

  Bowers, Alex J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Art; Core urriculum; Correlation; Grade oint average (GPA); Grades (scholastic); Grading; High school; Multivariate analysis; Non core curriculum; Physical education; Social studies; Standardized tests; Student evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960809317     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2011.597112     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allensworth, E.M., & Easton, J.Q. (2005). The on-track indicator as a predictor of High School raduation. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of hicago.
2. Allensworth, E.M., & Easton, J.Q. (2007). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in hicago Public High Schools: A close look at course grades, failures, and attendance in the reshman year. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
3. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D.J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and eeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early dentification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223-235.
4. Barclay, J.R., & Doll, B. (2001). Early prospective studies of the high school dropout. School sychology Quarterly, 16, 357-369.
5. Barrington, B.L., & Hendricks, B. (1989). Differentiating characteristics of high school raduates, dropouts, and nongraduates. The Journal of Educational Research, 82, 309-319.
6. Berliner, D.C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational esearcher, 31(8), 18-20.
7. Borg, I., & Gorenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. ew York, NY: Springer.
8. Bowers, A.J. (2008). Promoting excellence: Good to great, NYC's District 2, and the case of a igh-performing school district. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7, 154-177.
9. Bowers, A.J. (2009). Reconsidering grades as data for decision making: More than just cademic knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 609-629.
10. Bowers, A.J. (2010a). Analyzing the longitudinal K-12 grading histories of entire cohorts of tudents: Grades, data driven decision making, dropping out and hierarchical cluster nalysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 15(7), 1-18.
11. Bowers, A.J. (2010b). Grades and graduation: A longitudinal risk perspective to identify tudent dropouts. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 191-207.
12. Bowers, A.J., & Sprott, R. (in press). Examining the multiple trajectories associated with ropping out of high school: A growth mixture model analysis. The Journal of Educational esearch.
13. Bozick, R., Lauff, E., & Wirt, J. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS:2002): A rst look at the initial postsecondary experiences of the high school sophomore class of 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education ciences, U.S. Department of Education.
14. Bozick, R., Lyttle, T., Siegel, P.H., Ingels, S.J., Rogers, J.E., Lauff, E., & Planty, M. (2006).Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: First follow-up transcript component data file ocumentation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. epartment of Education.
15. Brennan, R.T., Kim, J., Wenz-Gross, M., & Siperstein, G.N. (2001). The relative quitability of high-stakes testing versus teacher-assigned grades: An analysis of the assachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS). Harvard Educational Review, 1, 173-215.
16. Brookhart, S.M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and ractice, 10(1), 35-36.
17. Brookhart, S.M. (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and ractice. Teachers College Record, 106, 429-458.
18. Burton, N.W., & Ramist, L. (2001). Predicting success in college: SAT studies of classes raduating since 1980. New York, NY: The College Board.
19. Cizek, G.J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution. Educational easurement: Issues and Practice, 19(2), 16-23.
20. Cizek, G.J., Fitzgerald, S.M., & Rachor, R.E. (1995-1996). Teachers' assessment practices: reparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159-179.
21. Cross, L.H., & Frary, R.B. (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers like. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 53-72.
22. Davidson, M.L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. New York, NY: Wiley.
23. Ekstrom, R.B., Goertz, M.E., Pollack, J.M., & Rock, D.A. (1986). Who drops out of high chool and why? Findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 87, 356-373.
24. Enserink, M. (2008). Mapmaker for the world of influenza. Science, 320, 310-311.
25. Ensminger, M.E., & Slusarcick, A.L. (1992). Paths to high school graduation or dropout: A ongitudinal study of a first-grade cohort. Sociology of Education, 65, 91-113.
26. Farr, B.P. (2000). Grading practices: An overview of the issues. In E. Trumbull & B. Farr Eds.), Grading and reporting student progress in an age of standards (pp. 1-22). Norwood, A: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
27. Fitzsimmons, S.J., Cheever, J., Leonard, E., & Macunovich, D. (1969). School failures: Now nd tomorrow. Developmental Psychology, 1, 134-146.
28. Frary, R.B., Cross, L.H., & Weber, L.J. (1993). Testing and grading practices and opinions of econdary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 23-30.
29. Glass, G.V. (1967). Factors in teachers' perceptions of students. Journal of Educational easurement, 4, 87-93.
30. Guskey, T.R. (2007). Multiple sources of evidence: An analysis of stakeholders' perceptions of arious indicators of student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26, 9-27.
31. Hallinan, M.T. (1992). The organization of students for instruction in middle school.Sociology of Education, 65, 114-127.
32. Heritage, M., & Yeagley, R. (2005). Data use and school improvement: Challenges and rospects. In J.L. Herman & E.H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational ccountability and improvement: 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of ducation (pp. 320-339). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
33. Ingles, S.J., Pratt, D.J., Rogers, J.E., Siegel, P.H., Stutts, E.S., & Owings, J.A. (2004). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base year data file user's manual. Washington, DC: ational Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. epartment of Education.
34. Ingles, S.J., Pratt, D.J., Wilson, D., Burns, L.J., Currivan, D., Rogers, J.E., & Hubbard- ednasz, S. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data ile documentation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of ducation Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
35. Klapp Lekholm, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2008). Discrepancies between school grades and test cores at individual and school level: Effects of gender and family background. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14, 181-199.
36. Klapp Lekholm, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2009). Effects of student characteristics on grades in ompulsory school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 1-23. doi:10.1080/ 3803610802470425
37. Kuncel, N.R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L.L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point verages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Reviewof Educational Research, 75, 63-82.
38. Linn, R.L. (1982). Ability testing: Individual differences, prediction, and differential rediction. In A.K. Wigdor & W.R. Garner (Eds.), Ability testing: Uses, consequences, nd controversies (pp. 335-388). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39. Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
40. Lloyd, D.N. (1974). Analysis of sixth grade characteristics predicting high school dropout or raduation. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 90.
41. Lloyd, D.N. (1978). Prediction of school failure from third-grade data. Educational and sychological Measurement, 38, 1193-1200.
42. Marzano, R.J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for upervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
43. McMillan, J.H. (2001). Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20-32.
44. McMillan, J.H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision aking: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and ractice, 22(4), 34-43.
45. Mead, A. (1992). Review of the development of multidimensional scaling. The Statistician, 41, 7-39.
46. National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Education longitudinal study of 2002(ELS:2002). Retrieved from http://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/
47. Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American ociety. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 297-318.
48. Pincus, H.S., & Schmelkin, L.P. (2003). Faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty: A ultidimensional scaling analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 196-209.
49. Powell, A.G., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D.K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and osers in the educational marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Randall, J., & Englehard, G., Jr. (2009). Examining teacher grades using Rasch measurement heory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984. 009.01066.x
51. Rumberger, R.W. (2004). Why students drop out of school. In G. Orfield (Ed.), Dropouts in merica: Confronting the graduation rate crisis (pp. 131-156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard ducation Press.
52. Rumberger, R.W., & Palardy, G.J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as lternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 3-42.
53. Russell, C.A., Jones, T.C., Barr, I.G., Cox, N.J., Garten, R.J., Gregory, V., Smith, D.J.(2008). The global circulation of seasonal influenza A (H3N2) viruses. Science, 320, 40-346.
54. Shavelson, R.J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: ational Academy Press.
55. Smith, D.J., Lapedes, A.S., deJong, J.C., Bestebroer, T.M., Rimmelzwaan, G.F., Osterhaus, D.M.E., & Fouchier, R.A.M. (2004). Mapping the antigenic and genetic evolution of nfluenza virus. Science, 305, 371-376.
56. Song, M., & Miskel, C.G. (2007). Exploring the structural properties of the state reading olicy domain using network visualization technique. Educational Policy, 21, 589-614.
57. Subkoviak, M.J. (1975). The use of multidimensional scaling in educational research. Review f Educational Research, 45, 387-423.
58. Willingham, W.W., Pollack, J.M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for bserved differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 1-37.
59. Woodruff, D.J., & Ziomek, R.L. (2004). High school grade inflation from 1991 to 2003 Research report series 2004-04). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
60. Zwick, R., & Greif Green, J. (2007). New perspectivies on the correlation of SAT scores, high chool grades and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 23-45.doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00025.x