Knowledge of a Second Language Influences Auditory Word Recognition in the Native Language

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 952-965

  Lagrou, Evelyne ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^a   Duyck, Wouter ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Accented speech; Auditory word recognition; Bilingualism; Lexical access

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SELF REPORT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SELF REPORT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 79960296202     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023217     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adank P., Evans B.G., Stuart-Smith J., Scott S.K. Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:520-529. doi: 10.1037/a0013552.
2. Baayen R., Piepenbrock R., Van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM] 1993, University of Pennsylvania Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Blumenfeld H., Marian V. Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking. Language and Cognitive Processes 2007, 22:633-660. doi: 10.1080/01690960601000746.
4. Bradlow A.R., Bent T. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 2008, 106:707-729. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005.
5. Caramazza A., Brones I. Lexical access in bilinguals. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1979, 13:212-214.
6. Chambers C.G., Cooke H. Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1029-1040. doi: 10.1037/a0015901.
7. Dijkstra T., Grainger J., Van Heuven W.J.B. Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:496-518. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2654.
8. Dijkstra T., Moscoso del Prado Martín F., Schulpen B., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2005, 20:7-41. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000124.
9. Dijkstra T., Timmermans M., Schriefers H. On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:445-464. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2697.
10. Dijkstra T., Van Heuven W.J.B. The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition 1998, 189-225. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Grainger, A.M. Jacobs (Eds.).
11. Dijkstra T., Van Heuven W.J.B. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2002, 5:175-197. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902003012.
12. Duyck W. Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudohomophones: Evidence for nonselective phonological activation in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1340-1359. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1340.
13. Duyck W., Desmet T., Verbeke L.P.C., Brysbaert M. WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 2004, 36:488-499. doi: 10.3758/BF03195595.
14. Duyck W., Van Assche E., Drieghe D., Hartsuiker R.J. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:663-679. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.663.
15. Elman J.L., McClelland J.L. Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language 1988, 27:143-165. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90071-X.
16. Elston-Güttler K.E., Gunter T.C., Kotz S. Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.007.
17. Gaskell M.G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes 1997, 12:613-656. doi: 10.1080/016909697386646.
18. Gerard L.D., Scarborough D.L. Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:305-315. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.305.
19. Graddol D. The future of language. Science 2004, February 27, 303:1329-1331. doi: 10.1126/science.1096546.
20. Grosjean F. Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 1988, 3:233-274. doi: 10.1080/01690968808402089.
21. Ju M., Luce P.A. Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science 2004, 15:314-318. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00675.x.
22. Lemhöfer K., Dijkstra T. Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:533-550. doi: 10.3758/BF03195845.
23. Léwy, N., & Grosjean, F. (1997). A computational model of bilingual lexical access. Manuscript in preparation, Neuchâtel University, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
24. Libben M.R., Titone D.A. Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:381-390. doi: 10.1037/a0014875.
25. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 1998, 19:1-36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001.
26. Marian V., Blumenfeld H., Boukrina O.V. Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2008, 37:141-170. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9.
27. Marian V., Spivey M. Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics 2003, 24:173-193. doi: 10.1017/S0142716403000092.
28. Marian V., Spivey M., Hirsch J. Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging. Brain and Language 2003, 86:70-82. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00535-7.
29. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 1987, 25:71-102. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9.
30. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Activation, competition and frequency in lexical access. Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives 1990, 148-172. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.).
31. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 1980, 8:1-71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90015-3.
32. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1978, 10:29-63. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X.
33. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18:1-86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.
34. Norris D.G. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 1994, 52:189-234. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4.
35. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A., Butterfield S. The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 34:191-243. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0671.
36. Schulpen B., Dijkstra T., Schriefers H.J., Hasper M. Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1155-1178. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1155.
37. Schwartz A.I., Kroll J.F. Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:197-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004.
38. Spivey M.J., Marian V. Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science 1999, 10:281-284. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00151.
39. Thierry G., Wu J. Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:12530-12535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609927104.
40. Van Assche E., Drieghe D., Duyck W., Welvaert M., Hartsuiker R.J. The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64:88-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.006.
41. Van Assche E., Duyck W., Hartsuiker R.J., Diependaele K. Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science 2009, 20:923-927. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x.
42. van Hell J.G., de Groot A.M.B. Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128:431-451. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.010.
43. van Hell J.G., Dijkstra T. Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:780-789. doi: 10.3758/BF03196335.
44. Weber A., Cutler A. Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:1-25. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0.