Evidence for ecology's role in speciation

Nature

Volumn 429, Issue 6989, 2004, Pages 294-298

  McKinnon, Jeffrey S ^a   Mori, Seiichi ^b   Blackman, Benjamin K ^c,e   David, Lior ^c,f   Kingsley, David M ^c   Jamieson, Leia ^a   Chou, Jennifer ^a   Schluter, Dolph ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b GIFU KEIZAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; POPULATION STATISTICS;

ASSORTATIVE MATING; NATURAL SELECTION;

ECOLOGY;

ALLOENZYME; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

NATURAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOLOGY; ECOTYPE; FEMALE; FISH; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ANIMAL; BODY CONSTITUTION; CANADA; CLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; ICELAND; JAPAN; NORWAY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA;

ALASKA; ANIMALS; BODY CONSTITUTION; BRITISH COLUMBIA; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FISHES; GEOGRAPHY; ICELAND; JAPAN; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; NORWAY; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SCOTLAND; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 2442675456     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature02556     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Nagel, L. & Schluter, D. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52, 209-218 (1998).
2. Greenberg, A. J., Moran, J. R., Coyne, J. A. & Wu, C. I. Ecological adaptation during incipient speciation revealed by precise gene replacement. Science 302, 1754-1757 (2003).
3. Schluter, D. & Nagel, L. M. Parallel speciation by natural selection. Am. Nat. 146, 292-301 (1995).
4. Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Boughman, J. & Schluter, D. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306-308 (2000).
5. Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. & Sandoval, C. P. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417, 440-443 (2002).
6. McPhail, J. D. in The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (eds Bell, M. A. & Foster, S. A.) 399-437 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1994).
7. McKinnon, J. S. & Rundle, H. Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 480-488 (2002).
8. Hagen, D. W. Isolating mechanisms in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus). J. Fish. Res. B. Can. 24, 1637-1692 (1967).
9. Bell, M. A. & Foster, S. A. in The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (eds Bell, M. A. & Foster, S. A.) 1-27 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1994).
10. Baker, J. A. in The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (eds Bell, M. A. & Foster, S. A.) 144-187 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1994).
11. Hendry, A. P., Taylor, E. B. & McPhail, J. D. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution 56, 1199-1216 (2002).
12. Rundle, H. D., Vamosi, S. M. & Schluter, D. Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14943-14948 (2003).
13. Snyder, R. J. & Dingle, H. Adaptive, genetically based differences in life history between estuary and freshwater threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Can. J. Zool. 67, 2448-2454 (1989).
14. McPhail, J. D. Inherited interpopulation differences in size at first reproduction in threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Heredity 38, 53-60 (1977).
15. Colosimo, P. F. et al. The genetic architecture of parallel armor plate reduction in threespine sticklebacks. PLoS Biol. 2, e109 (2004).
16. Buth, D. G. & Haglund, T. R. in The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (eds Bell, M. A. & Foster, S. A.) 61-84 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1994).
17. Orti, G., Bell, M. A., Reimchen, T. E. & Meyer, A. Global survey of mitochondrial DNA sequences in the threespine stickleback: evidence for recent colonizations. Evolution 48, 608-622 (1994).
18. Bell, M. A. Lateral plate evolution in the threespine stickleback: getting nowhere fast. Genetica 112-113, 445-461 (2001).
19. Hay, D. E. & McPhail, J. D. Mate selection in three-spine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus). Can. J. Zool. 53, 441-450 (1975).
20. Ziuganov, V. V. Reproductive isolation among lateral plate phenotypes (low, partial, complete) of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, from the White Sea basin and the Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia. Behaviour 132, 1173-1181 (1995).
21. Rundle, H. D. & Schluter, D. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52, 200-208 (1998).
22. Servedio, M. R. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and post-mating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55, 1909-1920 (2001).
23. Boughman, J. W. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411, 944-948 (2001).
24. Ishikawa, M. & Mori, S. Mating success and male courtship behaviors in three populations of the threespine stickleback. Behaviour 137, 1065-1080 (2000).
25. McKinnon, J. S. Video mate preferences of female three-spined sticklebacks from populations with divergent male coloration. Anim. Behav. 50, 1645-1655 (1995).
26. Peichel, C. L. et al. The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414, 901-905 (2001).
27. Luttberg, B., Towner, M. C., Wandesforde-Smith, A., Mangel, M. & Foster, S. A. State-dependent mate-assessment and mate-selection behavior in female threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus, Gasterosteiformes: Gasterosteidae). Ethology 107, 545-558 (2001).
28. Raufaste, N. & Rousset, F. Are partial Mantel tests adequate? Evolution 55, 1703-1705 (2001).
29. Mooers, A. Ø., Vamosi, S. M. & Schluter, D. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae). Am. Nat. 154, 249-259 (1999).
30. Hatfield, T. Genetic divergence in adaptive characters between sympatric species of stickleback. Am. Nat. 149, 1009-1029 (1997).