We're all in this together now: Group performance feedback to increase classroom team data collection

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 411-431

  Pellecchia, Melanie ^a   Connell, James E ^b   Eisenhart, Donald ^c   Kane, Meghan ^c   Schoener, Christine ^c   Turkel, Kimberly ^c   Riley, Megan ^c   Mandell, David S ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Elwyn ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Autism; Classroom team; Consultation; Fidelity; Generalization; Performance feedback

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCHOOL; STUDENT;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATA COLLECTION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS;

EID: 79959893826     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alberto P.A., Troutman A.C. Applied behavior analysis for teachers 2003, Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 6th ed.
2. Alvero A.M., Bucklin B.R., Austin J. An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 2001, 21:3-29.
3. Balcazar R., Hopkins B.L., Suarez Y. A critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 1985, 7:65-89.
4. Burns M.K., Peters R., Noell G.H. Using performance feedback to enhance implementation fidelity of the problem solving team process. Journal of School Psychology 2008, 46:537-550.
5. Codding R.S., Feinberg A.B., Dunn E.K., Pace G.M. Effects of immediate performance feedback on implementation of behavior support plans. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2005, 38:205-219.
6. Codding R.S., Smyth C.A. Using performance feedback to decrease transition time and examine collateral effects on academic engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 2008, 18:325-345.
7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ. 2nd ed.
8. Cooper J.O., Heron T.E., Heward W.L. Applied behavior analysis 2007, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
9. Cummings A.R., Carr J.E. Evaluating progress in behavioral programs for children with autism spectrum disorders via continuous and discontinuous measurement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2009, 42:57-71.
10. DiGennaro F.D., Martens B.K., Kleinman A.E. A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers' treatment implementation integrity and students' inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2007, 40:447-461.
11. Duhon G.J., Mesmer E.M., Gregerson L., Witt J.C. Effects of public during RTI team meetings on teacher implementation integrity and student academic performance. Journal of School Psychology 2009, 47:19-37.
12. Erchul W.P., Martens B.K. School consultation: Conceptual and empirical bases of practice 2002, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
13. Farmer R., Woolery M., Gast D.L., Page J.L. Individual staff training to increase the frequency of data collection in an integrated preschool program. Education and Treatment of Children 1988, 11:127-142.
14. Foegen A., Jiban C., Deno S. Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education 2007, 41:121-139.
15. Fuchs L.S., Deno S.L., Mirkin P.K. The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal 1984, 21:449-460.
16. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D. Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children 1986, 53(3):199-208.
17. Fuchs D., Fuchs L.S., Bahr M.W. Mainstream assistance teams: A scientific basis for the art of consultation. Exceptional Children 1990, 57(2):128-139.
18. Galloway J., Sheridan S.M. Implementing scientific practices through case studies: Examples using home-school interventions and consultation. Journal of School Psychology 1994, 32:385-413.
19. Ganz J. Classroom structuring methods and strategies for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptionality 2007, 15:49-260.
20. Hagermoser-Sanetti L.M., Kratochwill T.R. Treatment integrity assessment in the schools: An evaluation of the treatment integrity planning protocol. School Psychology Quarterly 2009, 24:24-35.
21. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647.
22. Jones K.M., Wickstrom K.F., Friman P.C. The effects of observational feedback on treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly 1997, 12:316-326.
23. Martens B.K., Hiralall A.S., Bradley T.A. A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting. School Psychology Quarterly 1997, 12:33-41.
24. Mortenson B.P., Witt J.C. The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a pre-referral academic system. School Psychology Review 1998, 27:613-627.
25. Noell G.H., Duhon G.J., Gatti S.L., Connell J.E. Consultation, follow-up, and implementation of behavior management interventions in general education. School Psychology Review 2002, 31:217-234.
26. Noell G.H., Witt J.C., Gilbertson D.N., Ranier D.D., Freeland J.T. Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly 1997, 12:77-88.
27. Noell G.H., Witt J.C., LaFleur L.H., Mortenson B.P., Ranier D.D., Levelle J. Increasing intervention implementation in general education following consultation: A comparison of two follow-up strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2000, 33:271-284.
28. Noell G., Witt J., Slider N., Connell J., Gatti L., Williams K., et al. Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review 2005, 34:87-106.
29. Parker R.I., Hagan-Burke S., Vannest K. Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. The Journal of Special Education 2007, 40:194-204.
30. Reinke W.M., Lewis-Palmer T., Martin E. The effect of visual performance feedback on teacher use of behavior-specific praise. Behavior Modification 2007, 31:247-263.
31. Reinke W.M., Lewis-Palmer T., Merrell K. The classroom check-up: A class-wide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review 2008, 37:315-332.
32. Sandall S.L., Schwartz I.S., Lacroix B. Interventionists' perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention 2004, 26:161-174.
33. Scruggs T.E., Mastropieri M.A. Synthesizing single subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification 1998, 22:221-242.
34. Sheridan S.M., Welch M., Orme S.F. Is consultation effective? A review of outcome research. Remedial and Special Education 1996, 17(6):341-354.
35. Skinner C., Pappas D., Davis K. Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools 2005, 42:389-403.
36. Stecker P.M., Fuchs L.S. Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 2000, 15(3):128-134.
37. Stecker P.M., Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D. Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools 2005, 42:795-819.
38. Stokes T.F., Baer D.M. An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1977, 10:349-367.
39. Sutherland K., Wehby J. Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education 2001, 22(2):113-121.
40. Thorne S., Kamps D. The effects of a group contingency intervention on academic engagement and problem behavior of at-risk students. Behavior Analysis in Practice 2008, 1(2):12-18.
41. Walton W.T. Educators' responses to methods of collecting, storing, and analyzing behavioral data. Journal of Special Education Technology 1985, 7:50-55.
42. Wesson C.L., King R.P., Deno S.L. Direct and frequent measurement of student performance: If it's good for us, why don't we do it?. Learning Disability Quarterly 1984, 7(1):45-48.