Progress monitoring measures in mathematics. A review of the literature

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 121-139

  Foegen, Anne ^a   Jiban, Cynthia ^b   Deno, Stanley ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548852633     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00224669070410020101     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allinder, R. M., & BeckBest, M. (1995). Differential effects of two approaches to supporting teachers' use of curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 24, 285-296.
2. Allinder, R. M., Boiling, R. M., Oats, R. G., & Gagnon, W. A. (2000). Effects of teacher self-monitoring implementation of curriculum-based measurement and mathematics computation achievement of students with disabilities. Remedial & Special Education, 21, 219-226.
3. Beatty, L. S., Gardner, E. G., Madden, R., & Karlsen, B. (1985). The Stanford diagnostic mathematics test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
4. Brigance, A. (1985). Brigance preschool screen. North Billerica, MA: Curriciulum Associates.
5. Brigance, A. (1999). Comprehensive inventory of basic skills (rev. ed.). North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
6. Cavanagh, S. (2006, February 15). White House suggests model used in reading to elevate math skills. Education Week. Retrieved September 28, 2006, from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/EdWeek_Article_PDF .pdf#search="Math Now
7. Chard, D., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 30(2), 3-14.
8. Christ, T. J., Johnson-Grohs, K. N., & Hintze, J. M. (2005). An examination of alternate assessment durations when assessing multiple-skill computational fluency: The generalizability and dependability of curriculum-based outcomes within the context of educational decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 615-622.
9. Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234-248.
10. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1992). California achievement tests (5th ed.). Monterey, CA: CTB Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
11. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2001). TerraNova. Monterey, CA: Author.
12. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
13. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192.
14. Deno, S. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (1987). Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(8), 1-16.
15. Epstein, M. H., Polloway, E. A., & Patton, J. R. (1989). Academic achievement probes: Reliability of measures for students with mild mental retardation. Special Services in the Schools, 5(1/2), 23-31.
16. Espin, C. A., Deno, S. L., Maruyama, G., & Cohen, C. (1989, April). The Basic Academic Skills Sample (BASS): An instrument for the screening and identification of children at risk for failure in regular education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
17. Foegen, A. (2000). Technical adequacy of general outcome measures for middle school mathematics. Diagnostique, 25, 175-203.
18. Foegen, A., & Deno, S. L. (2001). Identifying growth indicators for low-achieving students in middle school mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 4-16.
19. Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188-192.
20. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58, 232-243.
21. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429-438.
23. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989b). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43-52.
24. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6-22.
25. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
26. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Thompson, A., Roberts, P. H., Kupek, P., et al. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Diagnostique, 19(4), 23-49.
27. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
28. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C. L., Dutka, S., & Katzaroff, M. (2000). The importance of providing information on the structure and scoring of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 1-34.
29. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C. L., & Katzaroff, M. (1999). Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 609-646.
30. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 293-305.
31. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math concepts and applications [computer program manual]. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math computation (2nd ed.) [computer program manual]. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
33. Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (1990). Test of early mathematics ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
34. Harcourt, Brace, & Company. (1996). Stanford achievement test (9th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35. Helwig, R., Anderson, L., & Tindal, G. (2002). Using a concept-grounded, curriculum-based measure in mathematics to predict statewide test scores for middle school students with LD. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 102-112.
36. Helwig, R., & Tindal, G. (2002). Using general outcome measures in mathematics to measure adequate yearly progress as mandated by Title I. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(1), 9-18.
37. Hintze, J. M., Christ, T. J., & Keller, L. A. (2002). The generalizability of CBM survey-level mathematics assessments: Just how many samples do we need? School Psychology Review, 31, 514-528.
38. Hoover, J. D., Hieronymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1993). Iowa tests of basic skills. Chicago: Riverside.
39. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1984). Wide range achievement test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Assessment Systems.
40. Jitendra, A. K., Sczesniak, E., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). An exploratory validation of curriculum-based mathematical word problem-solving tasks as indicators of mathematics proficiency for third graders. School Psychology Review, 34, 358-371.
41. Jones, E. D., & Krause, J. P. (1988). The effectiveness of data-based instruction by student teachers in classrooms for pupils with mild learning handicaps. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 9-19.
42. Macmillan/McGraw-Hill. (1989). Comprehensive test of basic skills (4th ed.). Monterey, CA: Author.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.
44. Reys, B. J., Dingman, S., Sutler, A., & Teuscher, D. (2005). Development of state-level mathematics curriculum documents: Report of a survey. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri, Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum. Retrieved September 14, 2006, at http://www .mathcurriculumcenter.org/resources/ASSMReport.pdf
45. Riverside. (1995). Performance assessments for the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Chicago: Author.
46. Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
47. Shapiro, E. S., Edwards, L., & Zigmond, N. (2005). Progress monitoring of mathematics among students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 15-32.
48. Shinn, M., & Marston, D. (1985). Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 31-38.
49. Stecker, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 128-134.
50. Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795-819.
51. Thurber, R. S., Shinn, M. R., & Smolkowski, K. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31, 498-513.
52. Tindal, G., Germann, G., & Deno, S. L. (1983). Descriptive research on the Pine County norms: A compilation of findings (Research Report No. 132). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
53. Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S. L. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 109). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
54. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Broussard, C., Fabre, M., Stanley, J., LeGendre, J., & Creppell, R. (2004). Development and validation of curriculum-based measures of math performance for preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 27-41.
55. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Naquin, G. (2003). Development and validation of a process for screening referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32, 204-227.
56. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., Naquin, G., & Noell, G. (2001). The reliability and validity of curriculum-based measurement readiness probes for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 30, 363-382.
57. Woodcock, R. M., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-Revised. Alien, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.