Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND): An alternative to PND

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 194-204

  Parker, Richard I ^a   Hagan Burke, Shanna ^a   Vannest, Kimberly ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847078113     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00224669070400040101     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129-133.
2. Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1993). Calculating effect sizes for metaanalysis: The case of the single case. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(6), 621-631.
3. Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1994). Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler: A rejoinder to Scruggs and Mastropieri. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(8), 885-890.
4. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for accountable professionals (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Breckler, S. J. (1990). Application of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260-273.
6. Brossart, D. F., Parker, R. I., Olson, E. A., & Lakshmi, M. (2005). The relationship between visual analysis and five statistical analyses in a simple AB single-case research design. Behavior Modification.
7. Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1992). Statistical analysis in single-case research: Issues, procedures, and recommendations, with applications to multiple behaviors. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. Levin, R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 159-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685-716.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573-579.
13. Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-279). Retrieved September 3, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2002/11/11062002a.html
14. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
15. Forness, S. R. (2001). Special education and related services: What have we learned from meta-analysis? Exceptionality, 9(4), 185-197.
16. Good, P. I. (2001 ). Resampling methods: A practical guide to data analysis. Boston: Birkhauser.
17. Harbst, K. B., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Harris, S. R. (1991). Interrater reliability of therapists' judgments of graphed data. Physical Therapy, 71, 107-115.
18. Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19. Hintze, J. (2004). NCSS and PASS: Number cruncher statistical systems [Computer software]. Kaysville, UT.
20. Horner, R. H., Carr. E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
21. Kavale, K. A., Mathur, S. R., Forness, S. R., Quinn, M. M., & Rutherford, R. B., Jr. (2000). Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 142-157.
22. Kazdin, A. E. ( 1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., et al. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
24. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
25. Kratochwill, T. R., & Brody, G. H. (1978). Single subject designs: A perspective on the controversy over employing statistical inference and implications for research and training in behavior modification. Behavior Modification, 2, 291-307.
26. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2000). Empirically supported interventions and school psychology: Conceptual and practical issues: Part II. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 233-253.
27. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Cod ing Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341-389.
28. Linden Software, Ltd. (1998). i-extractor [Graph digitizing software]. United Kingdom: Author.
29. Mostert, M. P. (2001). Characteristics of meta-analyses reported in mental retardation, learning disabilities, and emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 9(4), 199-225.
30. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002)
31. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Homer, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137-148.
32. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990). Visual inspection of single-subject data: An empirical analysis. Mental Retardation, 28, 283-290.
33. Park, H., Marascuilo, L., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1990). Visual inspection and statistical analysis of single-case designs. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 311-320.
34. Parker, R. I., Brossait, D. F., Callicott, K. J., Long, J. R., Garcia de Alba, R., Baugh, F. G., et al. (2005). Effect sizes in single case research: How large is large? School Psychology Review, 34(1), 116-132.
35. Parker, R. I., Cryer, J., & Byrns, G. (in press). Controlling trend in single case research. School Psychology Quarterly.
36. Parker, R. I., Cryer, J. & Byrns, G. (2006). Controlling trend in single case research. School Psychology Quarterly. 21 (3) 418-440.
37. Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis (pp. 15-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analysis procedures for social science research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
40. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1994). The utility of the PND statistic: A reply to Allison and German. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 32, 879-883.
41. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221-242.
42. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227-244.
43. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24-33.
44. Shavelson, R. J., Towne, L., (Eds.) & the Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. StatsDirect, Ltd. (2005). StatsDirect [Computer software]. Cheshire, UK: Author.
46. Steiger. J. H. (2005) NDC (Non-Central Distribution Calculator). Down-loadable from http://www.statpower.net/page5.html
47. 2: A computer program for interval estimation, power calculation, and hypothesis testing for the squared multiple correlation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 4, 581-582.
48. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
49. Thompson, B., Diamond, K. E., McWilliam, R., Snyder, P., & Snyder, S. W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71, 181-194.
50. White, O. R. (1987). Some comments concerning: "The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research." Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 34-39.
51. Whitehurst, G. (2004, April). Wisdom of the head, not the heart. Distinguished Public Policy Lecture, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL.