Digital media, technologies and scholarship: Some shapes of eResearch in educational inquiry

Australian Educational Researcher

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 79-101

  Markauskaite, Lina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958799576     PISSN: 03116999     EISSN: 22105328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03216938     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). My school website. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority web site: http://www. myschool. edu. au.
2. Australian Council of Deans of Education (ACDE). (2009). Data repository for teacher education scoping study. Australia: The Australian Council of Deans of Education.
3. American Council of Learned Societies Commission (ACLS). (2006). Our cultural commonwealth: The final report of the American council of learned societies commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the humanities and social sciences. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from ACLS website: http://www. acls. org/uploadedFiles/ Publications/Programs/Our_Cultural_Commonwealth. pdf.
4. Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (2003). E-research: Methods, strategies and issues. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
5. Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57, 457-469.
6. Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., Messerschmitt, D. G., et al. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through Cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation blueribbon advisory panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation.
7. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The "digital natives" debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
8. Bishop, L. (2005). Protecting respondents and enabling data sharing: Reply to Parry and Mauthner. Sociology, 39(2), 333-336.
9. Blanke, T., Hedges, M., & Dunn, S. (2009). Arts and humanities e-science - current practices and future challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(4), 474-480.
10. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11. Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Linn, M. C., et al. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge, a 21st century agenda for the National Science Foundation. Arlington: NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning.
12. Broom, A., Cheshire, L., & Emmison, M. (2009). Qualitative researchers' understandings of their practice and the implications for data archiving and sharing. Sociology, 43(6), 1163-1180.
13. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
15. Burton, L. M., Purvin, D., & Garrett-Peters, R. (2009). Longitudinal ethnography: Uncovering domestic abuse in low-income women's lives. In G. H. Elder Jr. & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 70-92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16. Carmichael, P. (2007). Introduction: Technological development, capacity building and knowledge construction in education research. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(3), 235-247.
17. Carusi, A., & Jirotka, M. (2009). From data archive to ethical labyrinth. Qualitative Research, 9(3), 285-298.
18. Cole, F. T. H. (2008, December 3-5). Taking "data" (as a topic): The working policies of indifference, purification and differentiation. Paper presented at the 19th Australasian conference on information systems, Christchurch, New Zealand.
19. Conklin, J. (2006). Wicked problems and social complexity. New York: Wiley.
20. Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Success through partnership: Achieving a national vision for ICT in schools. Strategic plan to guide the implementation of the digital education revolution initiative and related initiatives. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://www. deewr. gov. au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/ Documents/DER%20Strategic%20plan. pdf.
21. Computing Research Association (CRA). (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for education and learning for the future: A vision and research agenda. Washington, DC: Computing Research Association.
22. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Dede, C. (2009). Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Technologies that facilitate generating knowledge and possibly wisdom. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 260-263.
24. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). (2006). An Australian eresearch strategy and implementation framework: Final report of the e-research coordinating committee. Commonwealth of Australia: Australian Government, DEST.
25. Dzemyda, G., Saltenis, V., & Tiesis, V. (2003). Forecasting models in the state education system. Informatics in Education, 2(1), 3-14.
26. EDM (2010) International Working Group on Educational Data Mining. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from: http://www. educationaldatamining. org.
27. Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4-10.
28. Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Freeman, M., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & Pierre, E. A. S. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 25-32.
30. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119-140.
31. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2. 0 and classroom research: What path should we take now?Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
32. Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (Eds.). (2009). The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Remond: Microsoft Research.
33. Hine, C. (Ed.). (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet. Oxford: Berg.
34. Hine, C. (Ed.). (2006). New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science. Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
35. IEA (2010). IEA online database. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement web site: http://www. ieadata. org.
36. Jackson, E. A. (2000). The unbounded vistas of science: Evolutionary limitations. Complexity, 5(5), 35-44.
37. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
38. Jankowski, N. W. (Ed.). (2009). E-research: Transformation in scholarly practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
39. Jirotka, M., Procter, R., Hartswood, M., Slack, R., Simpson, A., Catelijne, C., et al. (2005). Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: The eDiaMoND case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(4), 369-398.
40. Kaestle, C. F. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 26-31.
41. Kelly, A. (2009). In defence of anonymity: Rejoining the criticism. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 431-445.
42. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Koro-Ljungberg, M., Yendol-Hoppey, D., Smith, J. J., & Hayes, S. B. (2009). (e)pistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 687-699.
44. Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York: Peter Lang.
46. Laterza, V., Carmichael, P., & Procter, R. (2007). The doubtful guest? A virtual research environment for education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(3), 249-267.
47. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA sites 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERCSpringer.
48. Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., et al. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179-1189.
49. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
50. Markauskaite, L. (in press). Digital knowledge and digital research: What does eResearch offer education and social policy? In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody & J. Irwin (Eds.), Methodological choice and design: Linking scholarship, policy and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
51. Markauskaite, L., Aditomo, A., & Hellmers, L. (2009). Co-developing eResearch infrastructure: Technology-enhanced research practices, attitudes and requirements. Full technical report. Sydney: Intersect & The University of Sydney.
52. Markauskaite, L., & Reimann, P. (2008a, June 30 - July 4). Enabling teacher-led research and innovation: A conceptual design of an inquiry framework for ICT-enhanced teacher innovation. InProceedings of the world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications. ED-MEDIA 2008 (pp. 3484-3493). Austria, Vienna: AACE.
53. Markauskaite, L., & Reimann, P. (2008b, July 24-28). Enhancing and scaling-up designbased research: The potential of e-research. InProceedings of the international conference of learning sciences. ICLS 2008. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
54. Markham, A. N., & Baym, N. K. (Eds.). (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Los Angeles: Sage.
55. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
56. McWilliam, E., & Lee, A. (2006). The problem of "the problem with educational research". Australian Educational Researcher, 33(2), 43-60.
57. National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) Committee. (2008). Review of the national collaborative research infrastructure strategy's roadmap. Commonwealth of Australia: DEEWR.
58. Nersessian, N. J. (2009). How do engineering scientists think? Model-based simulation in biomedical engineering laboratories. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(4), 730-757.
59. O'Brien, L. (2005). E-research: An imperative for strengthening institutional partnerships. Educause Review, 40(6), 64-77.
60. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor - an emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535-557.
61. Parry, O., & Mauthner, N. (2005). Back to basics: Who re-uses qualitative data and why?Sociology, 39(2), 337-342.
62. Pea, R., Lindgren, R., & Rosen, J. (2008). Cognitive technologies for establishing, sharing and comparing perspectives on video over computer networks. Social Science Information, 47(3), 353-370.
63. Pea, R. D. (2006). Video-as-data and digital video manipulation techniques for transforming learning sciences research, education and other cultural practices. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan & P. Trifonas (Eds.), International handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 1321-1393). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
64. Poschl, U. (2004). Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learned Publishing, 17, 105-113.
65. Prenksy, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
66. Public Library of Science (PLoS). (2010). PloS computational biology: An official journal of the international society for computational biology. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://www. ploscompbiol. org/home. action.
67. Radford, M. (2006). Researching classrooms: Complexity and chaos. British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 177-190.
68. Reimann, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). New learning - old methods? How e-research might change technology-enhanced learning research (pp. 249-272). In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education. Dordrecht: Springer.
69. Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (2007). Solidarity through collaborative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 129-150.
70. Romero, A. C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 135-146.
71. Romero, A. C., & Ventura, S. (Eds.). (2006). Data mining in e-learning. Southampton: WITpress.
72. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Schleyer, T., Spallek, H., Butler, B. S., Subramanian, S., Weiss, D., Poythress, L., et al. (2008). Facebook for scientists: Requirements and services for optimizing how scientific collaborations are established. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), Retrieved April 23, 2010 from http://www. pubmedcentral. nih. gov/ articlerender. fcgi?artid=2553246.
74. Schneider, B. (2004). Building a scientific community: The need for replication. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1471-1483.
75. Schooneboom, J., Levene, M., Heller, J., Keenoy, K., & Turcsanyi-Szabo, M. (Eds.). (2007). Trails in education: Technologies that support navigational learning. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
76. Schroeder, R. (2007). Rethinking science, technology and social change. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
77. Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2007). Social science approaches to e-science: Framing an agenda. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), article 11.
78. SciVee. (2010). Scivee: Making science visible. Retrieved 23 April, 2010, from http://www. scivee. tv.
79. Seringhaus, M., & Gerstein, M. (2007). Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow's information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(1), 17.
80. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
81. Shulman, L. (1981). Disciplines of inquiry in education: An overview. Educational Researcher, 10(6), 5-23.
82. SkyServer. (2010). Sloan Digital Sky Survey/SkyServer. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://cas. sdss. org.
83. Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education - what works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.
84. Smeyers, P., & Depaepe, M. (2007). Educational research: Networks and technologies. The Netherlands: Springer.
85. Underwood, J., Smith, H., Luckin, R., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2008). E-science in the classroom - towards viability. Computers & Education, 50(2), 535-546.
86. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Voithofer, R. (2005). Designing new media education research: The materiality of data, representation, and dissemination. Educational Researcher, 34(9), 3-14.
88. Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable?British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 59-176.
89. Woolgar, S., & Coopmass, C. (2006). Virtual witnessing in a virtual age: A prospectus for social studies of e-science. In C. Hine (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science (pp. 1-25). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
90. Wouters, P. (2005, June 22-24). The virtual knowledge studio for the humanities and social sciences. Paper presented at the first international conference on e-social science, Manchester, UK.
91. Wouters, P., Vann, K., Scharnhorst, A., Ratto, M., Hellsten, I., Fry, J., et al. (2008). Messy shapes of knowledge - STS explores informatization, new media, and academic work. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 319-352). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Wyatt, S., Henwood, F., Miller, N., & Senker, P. (Eds.). (2000). Technology and in/equality: Questioning the information society. London: Routledge.
93. wwPTB. (2010). Worldwide protein data bank. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://www. wwpdb. org/.
94. Zhang, J. (2009). Towards a creative social web for learners and teachers. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 274-279.
95. Zhao, C.-M., & Luan, J. (2006). Data mining: Going beyond traditional statistics. New Directions for Institutional Research, 131, 7-16.