Internet inquiry: Conversations about method

Internet Inquiry: Conversations About Method

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-243

  Markham, Annette N ^a   Baym, Nancy K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949999468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483329086     Document Type: Book

References (332)

1. Allen, C. (1996). What's wrong with the "Golden Rule"? Conundrums of conducting ethical research in cyberspace. Information Society, 12, 175-187. doi:10.1080/713856146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713856146
2. Altork, K. (1995). Walking the fire line: The erotic dimension of the fieldwork experience. In D.Kulick & M.Willson (Eds), Taboo: Sex, identity, and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 107-139). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203420379_chapter_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203420379_chapter_4
3. Amit, V. (Ed). (2000a). Constructing the field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. London: Routledge.
4. Amit, V. (2000b). Introduction: Constructing the field. In V.Amit (Ed), Constructing the field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
5. AoIR (Association of Internet Researchers). (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research. Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
6. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Atran, S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2005, October). The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112(4), 744-776. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.744
9. Bagilhole, B. (2002). Women in non-traditional occupations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230501102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230501102
10. Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446215616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446215616
11. Bakardjieva, M., & Feenberg, A. (2001). Involving the virtual subject. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 233-240. doi:10.1023/A:1011454606534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011454606534
12. Bakardjieva, M., Feenberg, A., & Goldi, J. (2004). User-centered Internet research: The ethical challenge. In E.Buchanan (Ed), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
13. Bakardjieva, M., & Smith, R. (2001). The Internet in everyday life: Computer networking from the standpoint of the domestic user. New Media & Society, 3(1), 67-83.
14. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays, (M.Holquist, Ed.; C.Emerson & M.Holquist, Trans). Austin: University of Texas Press.
15. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
16. Balsamo, A. (1990). Rethinking ethnography: A work for the feminist imagination. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 11, 45-57.
17. Baron, N. (2003). Why email looks like speech: Proofreading, pedagogy, and public face. In J.Aitchison & D.Lewis (Eds), New media language (pp. 102-111). London: Routledge.
18. Baron, N. S., Squires, L., Tench, S., & Thompson, M. (2005). Tethered or mobile? Use of away messages in instant messaging by American college students. In R.Ling & P.Pedersen (Eds), Front stage-back stage: Mobile communication and the renegotiation of the social sphere. Retrieved January 28, 2005, from http://www.american.edu/tesol/Grimstad-Baron.pdf
19. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
20. Bauman, Z. (2005). Afterthought: On writing; on writing sociology. In N.Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1089-1098). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Baxter, L. A. (2007). Problematizing the problem in communication: A dialogic perspective. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 118-124. doi:10.1080/03637750701196847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196847
22. Baxter, L., & Montgomery, B. (2007). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
23. Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452204710 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204710
24. Baym, N. K. (2002). Interpersonal life online. In L. A.Lievrouw & S.Livingstone (Eds), Handbook of new media (pp. 62-76). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608245
25. Baym, N. K. (2006). Finding the quality in qualitative internet research. In D.Silver & A.Massanari (Eds), Critical cyberculture studies: Current terrains, future directions (pp. 79-87). New York: New York University Press.
26. Beaulieu, A. (2004). Mediating ethnography: Objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the Internet. Social Epistemology 18(2-3), 139-164. doi:10.1080/0269172042000249264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269172042000249264
27. Beaulieu, A. (2005). Sociable hyperlinks. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 183-197). Oxford: Berg.
28. Behar, R., & Gordon, D. A. (Eds). (1995). Women writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (1995). Introduction: Orientations. In D.Bell & G.Valentine (Eds), Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities. London: Routledge.
30. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
31. Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32. Binik, Y., Mah, K., & Kiesler, S. (1999). Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the Internet. Journal of Sex Research, 36(1), 82-90. doi:10.1080/00224499909551971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551971
33. Boast, R., Bravo, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2007, October). Return to Babel: Emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge. Information Society, 23(5), 395-403. doi:10.1080/01972240701575635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972240701575635
34. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. Bouthillette, A.-M., Retter, Y., & Ingram, G. B. (Eds). (1997). Queers in space: Communities, public places, sites of resistance. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
36. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. boyd, d. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D.Buckingham (Ed), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning-Youth, identity, and digital media volume. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Branwyn, G. (1994). Compu-sex: Erotica for cybernauts. In M.Dery (Ed), Flame wars: The discourse of cyberculture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39. Braziel, J. E., & LeBesco, K. (Eds). (2001). Bodies out of bounds: Fatness and transgression. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Brewer, J. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
41. Briggs, C. (1986). Learning how to ask. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139165990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165990
42. Brin, D. (1998). The transparent society: Will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom?Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Brown, K. M. (1991). Mama Lola. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. Bruckman, A. (1997, January 20). MediaMOO Symposium: The ethics of research in virtual communities. Retrieved February 12, 2002, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/asb/MediaMOO/ethics-symposium-97.html
45. Buchanan, E. (Ed). (2004). Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
46. Burawoy, M. (2001). Manufacturing the global. Ethnography, 2(2), 147-159. doi:10.1177/1466138101002002001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1466138101002002001
47. Burawoy, M., et al. (2000). Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
49. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex."New York: Routledge.
50. Butler, J. (1995). Contingent foundations. In S.Benhabib, J.Butler, D.Cornell, & N.Fraser (Eds), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (thinking gender) (pp. 35-57). London: Routledge.
51. Califia, P. (1994). Public sex: The culture of radical sex. Pittsburgh, PA: Cleir Press.
52. Callaway, H. (1992). Ethnography and experience: Gender implications in fieldwork and texts. In J.Okely & H.Callaway (Eds), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 29-49). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203450536_chapter_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203450536_chapter_2
53. Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory-The market test. In J.Law & J.Hassard (Eds), Actor network theory and after (pp. 181-195). Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace and gay male sexuality and embodied sexuality. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
55. Carey, J. W. (2005). Historical pragmatism and the Internet. New Media and Society, 7(4), 443-455. doi:10.1177/1461444805054107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444805054107
56. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
57. Cesara, M. (1982). Reflections of a woman anthropologist. New York: Academic Press.
58. Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
59. Christians, C. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N.Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Christians, C. G., & Carey, J. W. (1989). The logic and aims of qualitative research. In G.Stempel & B.Westley (Eds), Research methods in mass communication (2nd ed., pp. 354-374). New York: Prentice Hall.
61. Clair, R. P. (Ed). (2003). Expressions of ethnography: Novel approaches to qualitative methods. Albany: SUNY Press.
62. Clarke, A., & Fujimura, J. (Eds) (1992). The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth century life sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds). (1986). Writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
64. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
65. Consalvo, M., & Paasonen, S. (2002). Women & everyday uses of the Internet: Agency & identity. New York: Peter Lang.
66. Cooper, G. (2001). Conceptualising social life. In N.Gilbert (Ed), Researching social life (2nd ed., pp. 1-13). London: Sage.
67. Correll, S. (1995). The ethnography of an electronic bar: The lesbian café. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(3), 270-298. doi:10.1177/089124195024003002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124195024003002
68. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process. London: Sage.
69. Cunningham, S., & Turner, G. (2006). The media and communications in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
70. Dalmiya, V., & Alcoff, L. (1993). Are "old wives' tales" justified? In E.Potter & L.Alcoff (Eds), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 217-244). New York: Routledge.
71. Daneback, K. (in press). Love and sexuality on the Internet. Dissertation in progress. Institution for Social Work, Gothenburg University.
72. Danet, B. (2001a). Cyberplay: Communicating online. Oxford: Berg.
73. Danet, B. (2001b). Studies of cyberplay: Ethical and methodological aspects. Paper prepared for the Ethics Working Committee, Association of Internet Researchers. Retrieved January 15, 2002, from http://www.cddc.vt.edu/aoir/ethics/case.html.
74. Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1997). "HMMM … WHERE's THAT SMOKE COMING FROM?": Writing, play and performance on Internet relay chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4).
75. De Laet, M. K., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225-263. doi:10.1177/030631200030002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631200030002002
76. Denzin, N. (1989). The research act (3rd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
77. Denzin, N. (2004). Prologue: Online environments and interpretive social research (pp. 1-12). In M. D.Johns, S. S.Chen, & G. J.Hall (Eds), Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics. New York: Peter Lang Press.
78. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46. doi:10.1108/13673279810249369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673279810249369
83. Dimitrov, V., & Hodge, B. (2002). Social fuzziology: Study of fuzziness of social complexity. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-1778-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1778-2
84. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2001). Mapping cyberspace. London: Routledge.
85. Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In A. M.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29-59). London: Routledge.
86. Döring, N. (2000). Feminist views of cybersex: Victimization, liberation, and empowerment. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 863-884.
87. Eichhorn, K. (2001). Sites unseen: Ethnographic research in a textual community. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(4), 565-578. doi:10.1080/09518390110047075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518390110047075
88. Eisenberg, E. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242. doi:10.1080/03637758409390197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390197
89. Enslin, E. (1994). Beyond writing: Feminist practice and the limitations of ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 9(4), 537-568. doi:10.1525/can.1994.9.4.02a00040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.1994.9.4.02a00040
90. Escobar, A. (1994). Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. Current Anthropology, 35(3), 211-231. doi:10.1086/204266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/204266
91. Ess, C., & Jones, S. (2003). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. In E. A.Buchanan (Ed), Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
92. Featherstone, M., & Venn, C. (2006). Problematizing global knowledge and the New Encyclopaedia Project: An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 1-20. doi:10.1177/0263276406065779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276406065779
93. Feenberg, A., & Bakardjieva, M. (2004). Groupware for community: Between the real and the possible. Paper presented at Public Proofs: Science, Technology and Democracy, Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S) & EASST Conference, Paris.
94. Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(3), 267-294. doi:10.1177/089124193022003001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124193022003001
95. Forte, M. (2004). Co-construction and field creation: Website development as both an instrument and relationship in action research. In E.Buchanan (Ed), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
96. Forte, M. (2005). Centering the links: Understanding cybernetic patterns of coproduction, circulation and consumption. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 93-106). Oxford: Berg.
97. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction, Vol. I (R.Hurley Trans). New York: Random House.
98. Frankel, M., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet: A report of a workshop. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved February 1, 2002, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm.
99. Gajjala, R. (2004). Cyberselves: Feminist ethnographies of South Asian women. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
100. Gajjala, R., Rybas, N., & Altman, M. (2007). Epistemologies of doing: E-merging selves online. Feminist Media Studies, 7(2).
101. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
102. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
103. Geertz, C. (2000). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
104. Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
105. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
106. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
107. Glennie, P. D., & Thrift, N. J. (1996). Consumers, identities, and consumption spaces in early-modern England. Environment and Planning, A28, 25-45. doi:10.1068/a280025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a280025
108. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
109. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
110. Goggin, G. (2004). Virtual nation: The Internet in Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
111. Gonzalez, M. C. (2003). An ethics for postcolonial ethnography. In R. P.Clair (Ed), Expressions of ethnography: Novel approaches to qualitative methods (pp. 77-86). Albany: SUNY Press.
112. Goode, E. (1999). Sex with informants as deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 20, 301-324. doi:10.1080/016396299266416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016396299266416
113. Green, N. (1999). Disrupting the field: Virtual reality technologies and "multi-sited" ethnographic methods. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 409-421. doi:10.1177/00027649921955344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955344
114. Grindstaff, L. (2002). The money shot: Trash, class, and the marking of TV talk shows. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226309088.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226309088.001.0001
115. Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
116. Gross, L. (1991). Out of the mainstream: Sexual minorities and the mass media. In M.Wolf & A.Kielwasser (Eds), Gay people, sex, and the media. New York: Harrington Park Press.
117. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N.Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
118. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1999). At the border of narrative and ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(5), 561-573. doi:10.1177/089124199129023550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023550
119. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120. Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
121. Hamman, R. B. (1996). Cyborgasms: Cybersex amongst multiple-selves and cyborgs in the narrow-bandwidth space of America Online chat rooms. MA thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Essex. Retrieved September 26, 2006, from http://www.socio.demon.co.uk/Cyborgasms_old.html
122. Hammersley, M. (1998). Reading ethnographic research (2nd ed). London: Longman.
123. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
124. Hannerz, U. (1992). Cultural complexity: Studies in the social organization of meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
125. Haraway, D. (1991a). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
126. Haraway, D. (1991b). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
127. Haraway, D. (1997a). Modest witness@second millennium: FemaleMan_meetsOncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.
128. Haraway, D. (1997b). The virtual speculum in the new world order. Feminist Review, 55, 22-72. doi:10.1057/fr.1997.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1997.3
129. Haraway, D. (2000). How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York: Routledge.
130. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?London: Open University Press.
131. Harding, S. (1992). After the neutrality ideal: Science, politics, and "strong objectivity." Social Research, 59(3), 567-587.
132. Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornwaite (Eds), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 3-41). London: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470774298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298
133. Heath, D., Koch, E., Ley, B. L., & Montoya, M. (1999). Nodes and queries: Linking locations in networked fields of inquiry. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 450-460. doi:10.1177/00027649921955371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955371
134. Herman, A., & Swiss, T. (2000). The world wide web and contemporary cultural theory. London: Routledge.
135. Hermes, J. (1995). Reading women's magazines: An analysis of everyday media use. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
136. Herring, S. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2).
137. Herring, S. C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computermediated communication. New Media & Society, 6(1), 26-36. doi:10.1177/1461444804039906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039906
138. Hess, D. (2001). Ethnography and the development of science and technology studies. In P.Atkinson, A.Coffey, S.Delamont, J.Lofland, & L.Lofland (Eds), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 234-245). London: Sage.
139. Hey, T., & Trefethen, A. E. (2002). The UK e-Science Core Programme and the grid. Future Generation Computing Systems, 18(8), 1017-1031. doi:10.1016/S0167-739X(02)00082-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X%2802%2900082-1
140. Hine, C. (1995). Representations of information technology in disciplinary development: Disappearing plants and invisible networks. Science, Technology and Human Values, 20(1), 65-85. doi:10.1177/016224399502000104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000104
141. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
142. Hine, C. (2001). Web pages, authors and audiences: The meaning of a mouse click. Information, Communication & Society, 4(2), 182-198.
143. Hine, C. (2002). Cyberscience and social boundaries: The implications of laboratory talk on the Internet. Sociological Research Online, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/hine.html doi:10.5153/sro.715 http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.715
144. Hine, C. (2005a). Introduction: Virtual methods and the sociology of cybersocial-scientific knowledge (pp. 1-16). In C.Hine (Ed). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.
145. Hine, C. (Ed). (2005b). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.
146. Hine, C. (2008). Systematics as cyberscience: Computers, change and continuity in science. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262083713.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262083713.001.0001
147. Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. (2003) Cyberkids: Children in the information age. London: Routledge Falmer.
148. Howard, P. N. (2002). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society, 4(4), 550-574. doi:10.1177/146144402321466813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466813
149. Howard, P. N., & Jones, S. (Eds). (2004). Society online: The Internet in context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452229560 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229560
150. Howard, P. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 382-404.
151. HSFR. (1990/1999). Forskningsetiska principer i humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Antagna av Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga forskningsrådet i mars (Ethical principles for scientific research in the humanities and Social Sciences adopted by the Swedish Council for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences [HSFR]). Retrieved February 11, 2002, from http://www.vr.se/download/18.6687410b37070528800029/HS%5B1%5D.pdf
152. IRB Guidebook. (n.d). Office for Human Research Protections. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_introduction.htm
153. Irwin, K. (2006). Into the dark heart of ethnography: The lived ethics and inequality of intimate field relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 29(2), 155-175. doi:10.1007/s11133-006-9011-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9011-3
154. Jackson, S. (1986). Building a case for claims about discourse structure. In D. G.Ellis & W. A.Donohue (Eds), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
155. Johns, M. D., Chen, S. L. S., & Hall, G. J. (Eds). (2004). Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics. New York: Peter Lang Press.
156. Jones, S. G. (Ed). (1999). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231471 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231471
157. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
158. Karlsson, A. M. (2002). Skriftbruk i förändring. En semiotisk studie av den personliga hemsidan. Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. New series 25. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
159. Kauffman, B. (1992). Feminist facts: Interview strategies and political subjects in ethnography. Communication Theory, 2(3), 187-206. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00038.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00038.x
160. Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi:10.1525/california/9780520230361.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520230361.001.0001
161. Kendall, L. (2005). Diary of a networked individual. In Internet research annual, 2. New York: Peter Lang.
162. King, S. A. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. Information Society, 12(2), 119-127. doi:10.1080/713856145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713856145
163. Kivits, J. (2005). Online interviewing and the research relationship. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 35-50). Oxford: Berg.
164. Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
165. Kohler Riessman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis: Qualitative research methods Series 30. London: Sage.
166. Kraidy, M. M. (1999). The global, the local, and the hybrid: A native ethnography of glocalization. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 16, 456-476. doi:10.1080/15295039909367111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039909367111
167. Kulick, D. (1995). Introduction: The sexual life of anthropologists: Erotic subjectivity and ethnographic work. In D.Kulick & M.Willson (Eds), Taboo: Sex, identity, and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 1-28). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203420379 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203420379
168. Kulick, D., & Willson, M. (Eds). (1995). Taboo: Sex, identity, and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203420379 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203420379
169. Lally, E. (2002). At home with computers. Oxford: Berg.
170. Lather, P. (2001). Postbook: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. Signs, 27(1), 199-227. doi:10.1086/495677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495677
171. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
172. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M.Lynch & S.Woolgar (Eds), Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
173. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
174. Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390-410. doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716
175. Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday "sitings" of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211-240. doi:10.1080/14636310303140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14636310303140
176. Lengel, L. B. (1998). Researching the "other," transforming ourselves: Methodological considerations of feminist ethnography. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22(3), 229-250. doi:10.1177/0196859998022003001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0196859998022003001
177. Lenhart, A. (2001, September 21). Who's not online: 57% of those without Internet access say they do not plan to log on. Retrieved January 28, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Pew_Those_Not_Online_Report.pdf
178. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
179. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind, trans. JohnWeightman and DoreenWeightman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
180. Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
181. Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446219522 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219522
182. Livingstone, S. (2006). Children's privacy online: Experimenting with boundaries within and beyond the family. In R.Kraut, M.Brynin, & S.Kiesler (Eds), Computers, phones and the Internet: Domesticating information technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
183. Lövheim, M. (1999). Making meaning of virtual religion: Methodological and ethical concerns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, and the Religious Research Association, Boston.
184. Lull, J. (1991). Inside family viewing. London: Routledge.
185. Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26-54. doi:10.1177/02632760022051202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202
186. Mackay, H. (2005). New connections, familiar settings: Issues in the ethnographic study of new media use at home. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 129-140). Oxford: Berg.
187. Malinowski, B. (1967). A diary in the strict sense of the term. London: Routledge.
188. Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
189. Månsson, S. A., & Söderlind, P. (2003). Sexindustrin på nätet. Aktörer, innehåll, relationer och ekonomiska flöden. Stockholm: Egalité.
190. Marcus, G. E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
191. Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
192. Holmes, D. R., & Marcus, G. E. (2005). Refunctioning ethnography: The challenge of an anthropology of the contemporary. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1099-1113). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
193. Markham, A. (1995). Designing discourse: A critical analysis of strategic ambiguity and workplace control. Management Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 389-421. doi:10.1177/0893318996009004002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318996009004002
194. Markham, A. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
195. Markham, A. (2003, October 19). Broadening options and raising standards for qualitative Internet research: A dialogue among scholars. Roundtable conducted at the Association of Internet Researchers 4th annual convention, Toronto.
196. Markham, A. (2004a). Internet communication as a tool for qualitative research. In D.Silverman (Ed), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 95-124). London: Sage.
197. Markham, A. (2005a). Disciplining the future: A critical organizational analysis of Internet Studies. Information Society, 21, 257-267. doi:10.1080/01972240591007571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972240591007571
198. Markham, A. (2005b). Go ugly early: Fragmented narrative and bricolage as interpretive method. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 813-839. doi:10.1177/1077800405280662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280662
199. Markham, A. (2005c). The politics, ethics, and methods of representation in online ethnography. In N.Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 793-820). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
200. Markham, A. (2006). Ethic as method, method as ethic. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37-54. doi:10.3172/JIE.15.2.37 http://dx.doi.org/10.3172/JIE.15.2.37
201. Marshall, J. (2003). The sexual life of cyber-savants. Australian Journal of Anthropology, 14, 229-248. doi:10.1111/j.1835-9310.2003.tb00232.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2003.tb00232.x
202. Martin, E. (1995). Flexible bodies: The role of immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.
203. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
204. McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail's mass communication theory (4th ed). London: Sage.
205. McRae, S. (1996). Coming apart at the seams: Sex, text and the virtual body. In L.Cherny & E. RebaWeise (Eds), Wired women (pp. 242-263). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
206. McRae, S. (1997). Flesh made word: Sex, text and the virtual body. In D.Porter (Ed), Internet culture (pp. 73-86). New York: Routledge.
207. Miller, D. (Ed). (1995). Worlds apart: Modernity through the prism of the local. London: Routledge.
208. Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
209. Mitchell, E. (1985). The dynamics of family interaction around home video games. In M. B.Sussman (Ed), Personal computers and the family. New York: Haworth Press.
210. Montgomery, B. M., & Baxter, L. A. (1998). Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
211. Moor, J. (1997). Toward a theory of privacy for the information age. Computers and Society, 27(3), 27-32. doi:10.1145/270858.270866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/270858.270866
212. Moores, S. (2000). Media and everyday life in modern society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
213. Morley, D. (1980). The nationwide audience. London: British Film Institute.
214. Morley, D. (1986). Family television. London: Comedia.
215. Mosher, J. (2001). Setting free the bears: Refiguring fat men on television. In J. E.Braziel & K.LeBesco (Eds), Bodies out of bounds: Fatness and transgression (pp. 166-196). Berkeley: University of California Press.
216. Munt, S. R. (2001). Technospaces: Inside the new media. New York: Continuum.
217. Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446220740 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220740
218. NESH. (1999). Forskningsetiske retningslinjer for samfunnsvitenskap, jus og humaniora. (Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, law and the humanities). Retrieved February 11, 2002, from http://www.etikkom.no/NESH/nesh.htm
219. Newton, E. (1993a). Cherry Grove, Fire Island. New York: Beacon.
220. Newton, E. (1993b). My best informant's dress. Cultural Anthropology, 8, 1-23. doi:10.1525/can.1993.8.1.02a00010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.1993.8.1.02a00010
221. Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1995). Home and work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
222. O'Brien, J. (1999). Writing in the body: Gender (re)production in online interaction. In M.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds), Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
223. Olwig, K. F., & Hastrup, K. (Eds). (1997). Siting culture: The shifting anthropological object. London: Routledge.
224. Orgad, S. (2005a). Moving from online to offline relationships with research participants. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 51-65). Oxford: Berg.
225. Orgad, S. (2005b). Storytelling online: Talking breast cancer on the Internet. New York: Peter Lang.
226. Orgad, S. (2007). The interrelations between online and offline: Questions, issues and implications. In R.Mansell, C.Avgerou, D.Quah, & R.Silverstone (Eds), The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies (pp. 514-536). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
227. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? IRB guidebook. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_guidebook.htm
228. O'Riordan, K., & Phillips, D. (2007). Queer online: Media, technology, & sexuality. New York: Peter Lang.
229. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
230. Park, H., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the world wide web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4). (http://jcmc.indiana.edu/)
231. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
232. Philo, G., & Berry, M. (2004). Bad news from Israel. London: Pluto Press.
233. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit one another. In W. E.Bijker, T. P.Hughes, & T.Pinch (Eds), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 17-50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
234. Pitts, V. (2004). Illness and Internet empowerment: Writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health, 8(1), 33-59.
235. Plant, S. (1998). Coming across the future. In J. BroadhurstDixon & E. J.Cassidy (Eds), Virtual futures: Cyberotics, technology and post-human pragmatism (pp. 30-36). London: Routledge.
236. Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2. London: Sage.
237. Porter, D. (1997). Internet culture. London: Routledge.
238. Poster, J. (2002). Trouble, pleasure, and tactics: Anonymity and identity in a lesbian chat room. In M.Consalvo & S.Paasonen (Eds), Women & everyday uses of the Internet: Agency & identity. New York: Peter Lang.
239. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
240. Rabinow, P. (1977). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
241. Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
242. Rambo-Ronai, C. (1995). Multiple reflections of child sex abuse: An argument for a layered account. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 395-426. doi:10.1177/089124195023004001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124195023004001
243. Reid, E. (1996). Informed consent in the study of on-line communities: A reflection on the effects of computer-mediated social research. Information Society, 12(2), 169-174. doi:10.1080/713856138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713856138
244. Reid, E. (1999). Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In A. M.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 107-133). London: Routledge.
245. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
246. Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
247. Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
248. Robins, K., & Webster, F. (1999). Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life. New York: Routledge.
249. Robinson, W. (2001). Clicks, cliques, soaps, and posts. Resource Center for Cyberculture Studies. Retrieved from http://rccs.usfca.edu/bookinfo.asp?ReviewID=115&BookID=103
250. Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the world wide web. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 141-163. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304
251. Rommetveit, R. (1980). On "meanings" of acts and what is meant and made known by what is said in a pluralistic social world. In M.Brenner (Ed), The structure of action (pp. 108-149). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
252. Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
253. Rutter, J., & Smith, G. W. H. (2005). Ethnographic presence in a nebulous setting. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 81-92). Oxford: Berg.
254. Sanders, T. (2005). Researching the online sex work community. In C.Hine (Ed), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 67-79). Oxford: Berg.
255. Schaap, F. (2002). The words that took us there: Ethnography in a virtual reality. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
256. Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2004). The web as an object of study. New Media & Society, 6(1), 114-122. doi:10.1177/1461444804039912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039912
257. Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2005). Web sphere analysis: An approach to studying online action. In C.Hine (Ed) Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 157-170). Oxford: Berg.
258. Schrage, M. (1990). Shared minds: The new technologies of collaboration. New York: Random House.
259. Seale, C. (2005). New directions for critical Internet health studies: Representing cancer experience on the web. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(4), 515-540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00454.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00454.x
260. Select Committee on Science and Technology (2002). What on Earth? The threat to the science underpinning conservation. London: House of Lords.
261. Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Furlong, J. (2005). Whose Internet is it anyway? Exploring adults' (non)use of the Internet in everyday life. European Journal of Communication, 20(1), 5-26doi:10.1177/0267323105049631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323105049631
262. Sennett, R. (1974). The fall of public man. New York: W. W. Norton.
263. Shaw, D. (1997). Gay men and computer communication: A discourse of sex and identity in cyberspace. In S.Jones (Ed), Virtual culture: Identity & communication in cybersociety. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446250303 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250303
264. Silverman, D. (1989). Six rules of qualitative research. Symbolic Interaction, 12(2), 215-230. doi:10.1525/si.1989.12.2.215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1989.12.2.215
265. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage
266. Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage.
267. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
268. Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
269. Skeggs, B. (1994). Situating the production of feminist ethnography. In M.Maynard & J.Purvis (Eds), Researching women's lives (pp. 72-93). Basingstoke: Taylor and Francis.
270. Skeggs, B. (2001). Feminist ethnography. In S.Delamont, P.Atkinson, & A.Coffey (Eds), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 426-442). London: Sage.
271. Slack, J. D. (1981). Programming protection: The problem of software. Journal of Communication, 31, 151-163. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01214.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01214.x
272. Slack, J. D. (1989). Contextualizing technology. In B.Dervin, L.Grossberg, B. O'Keefe, & E.Wartella (Eds), Rethinking communication; Vol. 2: Paradigm/exemplars (pp. 329-345). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
273. Slack, J. D., & Allor, M. (1983). The political and epistemological constituents of critical communication research. Journal of Communication, 33, 208-218. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02421.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02421.x
274. Slack, J. D., & Wise, J. M. (2005). Culture + technology: A primer. New York: Peter Lang.
275. Slater, D. (2002). Social relationships and identity online and offline. In L.Lievrouw & S.Livingstone (Eds), The handbook of new media (pp. 534-547). London: Sage.
276. Smith, J. K., & Deemer, D. K. (2000). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In N.Denzin & Y.Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 877-896). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
277. Smith, M., & Kollock, P. (Eds). (1999). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge. doi:10.5117/9789056290818 http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789056290818
278. Spinello, R., & Tavani, H. (2004). Readings in cyberethics. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
279. Srinivasan, R. (2006). Indigenous, ethnic, and cultural articulations of new media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(4). doi:10.1177/1367877906069899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367877906069899
280. Srinivasan, R. (2007). Ethnomethodological architectures: The convergence between an information system and the cultural landscape. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 58(5). doi:10.1002/asi.20544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20544
281. Srinivasan, R., & Huang, J. (2005). Fluid ontologies for digital museums. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 5, 193-204. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0105-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00799-004-0105-9
282. Srinivasan, R., & Pyati, A. (2007). Diasporic information environments: Re-framing immigrant information focused research. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1734-1744. doi:10.1002/asi.20658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20658
283. Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families. New York: Basic Books.
284. Stern, S. (2003). Encountering distressing information in online research: A consideration of legal and ethical responsibilities. New Media and Society, 5, 249-266. doi:10.1177/1461444803005002006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002006
285. Stern, S. (2004). Studying youth online: A consideration of ethical issues. In E. A.Buchanan (Ed), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 274-287). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
286. Sterne, J. (2000). Bordieu, technique, and technology. Cultural Studies 17(3/4), 367-389.
287. Sterne, J. (2005). Digital media and disciplinarity. Information Society, 21, 249-256. doi:10.1080/01972240591007562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972240591007562
288. Sterne, J., & Leach, J. (2005). The point of social construction and the purpose of social critique. Social Epistemology, 19(2-3), 189-198. doi:10.1080/02691720500224657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691720500224657
289. Stone, A. R. (1996). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
290. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
291. Sudweeks, F., & Rafaeli, S. (1995). How do you get a hundred strangers to agree? Computer-mediated communication and collaboration. In T. M.Harrison & T. D.Stephen (Eds), Computer networking and scholarship in the 21st century university (pp. 115-137). New York: SUNY Press.
292. Sundén, J. (2003). Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment. New York: Peter Lang.
293. Sveningsson, M. (2001). Creating a sense of community. Experiences from a Swedish web chat. Dissertation, Linköping Studies in Art and Science.
294. Sveningsson, M. (2003). Ethics in Internet ethnography. In E. A.Buchanan (Ed), Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
295. Sveningsson, M. (2005). Ungdomars köns- och identitetsarbete på internet. In B.Axelsson & J.Fornäs (Eds), Kulturstudier i Sverige. Nationell forskarkonferens. Norrköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.
296. Sveningsson, M., Lövheim, M., & Bergquist, M. (Eds). (2003). Att fånga nätet: Kvalitativa metoder för Internetforskning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
297. Svensson, I. (2002). Maskulinitet som behag och begär. Om läderbögars självpresentation. In L.Gerholm (Ed), Lust, lidelse och längtan. Kulturella perspektiv på sexualitet. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
298. Taylor, T. L. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other on-line research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 436-449. doi:10.1177/00027649921955362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955362
299. Thompson, J. B. (1994). Social theory and the media. In D.Crowley & D.Mitchell (Eds), Communication theory today (pp. 27-49). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
300. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
301. Thorseth, M. (Ed). (2003). Applied ethics in Internet research. Programme for Applied Ethics, Publication Series No. 1. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
302. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
303. Turnbull, D. (2007). Maps, narratives and trails: Performative, hodology, distributed knowledge in complex adaptive systems-An approach to emergent mapping. Geographical Review, 45(2), 140-149.
304. Tyler, S. (1986). Postmodern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document. In J.Clifford & G.Marcus (Eds), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 122-140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
305. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
306. Vanderwal, Thomas (n.d). Folksonomy. Retrieved from http://www.vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html
307. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
308. Van Zoonen, L. (2002). Gendering the Internet: Claims, controversies and cultures. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 5-23. doi:10.1177/0267323102017001605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001605
309. Wakeford, N. (1996). Sexualized bodies in cyberspace. In W.Chernaik, M.Deegan, & A.Gibson (Eds), Beyond the book: Theory, culture, and the politics of cyberspace. London: University of London.
310. Wakeford, N. (2000). Cyberqueer. In D.Bell & B.Kennedy (Eds), The cybercultures reader. New York: Routledge.
311. Wakeford, N. (2003). Research note: Working with new media's cultural intermediaries. The development of collaborative projects at INCITE. Information, Communication and Society 6(2), 229-245. doi:10.1080/1369118032000093905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118032000093905
312. Walker, J. (2002, June). Making common ground: Methodological and ethical challenges in Internet research. Presentation at Nordic Interdisciplinary Workshop at NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
313. Ward, K. (2003). An ethnographic study of Internet consumption in Ireland: Between domesticity and the public participation. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EMTEL/reports/ward_2003_emtel.pdf
314. Warren, C. A. B., & Hackney, J. K. (2000). Gender issues in ethnography. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
315. Waskul, D. (2003). Self-games and body-play: Personhood in online chat and cybersex. New York: Peter Lang.
316. Waskul, D., & Douglass, M. (1996). Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. Information Society, 12(2), 129-139. doi:10.1080/713856142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713856142
317. Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, globalization, and networked individualism. In M.Tanabe, P.van den Besselar, & T.Ishida (Eds), Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (pp. 10-25). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-45636-8_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45636-8_2
318. Wellman, B. (n.d). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/netlab/PUBLICATIONS/_frames.html
319. Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds). (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470774298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298
320. Wengle, J. (1988). Ethnographers in the field: The psychology of research. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
321. Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
322. Weston, K. (1998). Long slow burn: Sexuality and social science. New York: Routledge.
323. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
324. Wilson, B., & Atkinson, M. (2005). Rave and straightedge, the virtual and the real: Exploring on-line and off-line experiences in Canadian youth subcultures. Youth & Society, 36(3), 276-311. doi:10.1177/0044118X03260498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X03260498
325. Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
326. Wolcott, H. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
327. Wolcott, H. (2005). Art of fieldwork (2nd ed). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
328. Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice told tale: Feminism, postmodernism, and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
329. Woodland, R. (2000). Queer spaces, modem boys and pagan statues: Gay/lesbian identity and the construction of cyberspace. In D.Bell & B.Kennedy (Eds), The cybercultures reader. New York: Routledge.
330. Woolgar, S. (1988). Reflexivity is the ethnographer of the text. In S.Woolgar (Ed), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 14-34). London: Sage.
331. Woolgar, S. (Ed). (2002). Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
332. Wright, L. K. (Ed). (1997). The bear book: Readings in the history and evolution of a gay male subculture. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.