A dual process motivational model of ambivalent sexism and gender differences in romantic partner preferences

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 303-317

  Sibley, Chris G ^a   Overall, Nickola C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

authoritarianism; dominance; dual process model; human mate selection; prejudice; romance; sexism

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958162298     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: 14716402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0361684311401838     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Altemeyer B.The authoritarian spectre. London: Harvard University Press; 1996:.
2. Buss D. M.Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989;12:1-14.
3. Buss D. M.Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1999:.
4. Buss D. M.,Barnes M.Preferences in human mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;50:559-570.
5. Cikara M.,Eberhardt J. L.,Fiske S. T.From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011;3:540-551.
6. Cikara M.,Lee T. L.,Fiske S. T.,Glick P.Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Jost J. T.Kay A. C.Thorisdottir H., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009:444-462.
7. Dru V.Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: Effects of various self-categorization conditions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007;43:877-883.
8. Duckitt J.Advances in experimental social psychology. Zanna M. P., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2001:41-113.
9. *Duckitt J.,Sibley C. G.New Zealand: University of Auckland; 2006:.
10. Duckitt J.,Sibley C. G.Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice.European Journal of Personality. 2007;21:113-130.
11. Duckitt J.,Sibley C. G.A dual process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice.Psychological Inquiry. 2009;20:98-109.
12. Duckitt J.,Sibley C. G.Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially moderate intergroup effects on prejudice.European Journal of Personality. 2010;24:583-601.
13. Duncan L. E.,Peterson B. E.,Ax E. E.Authoritarianism as an agent of status quo maintenance: Implications for women's careers and family lives.Sex Roles. 2003;49:619-630.
14. Eagly A. H.,Wood W.The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles.American Psychologist. 1999;54:408-423.
15. *Eastwick P. W.,Eagly A. H.,Glick P.,Johannesen-Schmidt M. C.,Fiske S. T.,Blum A. M.,Volpato C.Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations.Sex Roles. 2006;54:603-614.
16. Engels F.The origin of the family, private property and the state. Chippendale, Australia: Resistance Books; 1884/2004:.
17. Fletcher G. J. O.The new science of intimate relationships. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell; 2002:.
18. Fletcher G. J. O.,Simpson J. A.,Thomas G.,Giles L.Ideals in intimate relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;76:72-89.
19. Fletcher G. J. O, Tither, J. M.,O'Loughlin C.,Friesen M.,Overall N.Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004;30:659-679.
20. *Forbes G. B.,Collinsworth L. L.,Jobe R. L.,Braun K. D.,Wise L. M.Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs?.Sex Roles. 2007;56:265-273.
21. Glick P.,Fiske S. T.The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;70:491-512.
22. Glick P.,Fiske S. T.,Mladinic A.,Saiz J. L.,Abrams D.,Masser B.,López López W.Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;79:763-775.
23. Glick P.,Lamerias M.,Fiske S. T.,Eckes T.,Masser B.,Volpato C.,Wells R.Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;86:713-728.
24. Hedges L. V.,Olkin I.Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1985:.
25. Jackman M. R.The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkley, CA: University of California Press; 1994:.
26. *Johannesen-Schmidt M. C.,Eagly A. H.Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2002;26:322-328.
27. Koyama N. F.,McGain A.,Hill R. A.Self-reported mate preferences and "feminist" attitudes regarding martial relations.Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;25:327-335.
28. Krizan Z.Synthesizer 1.0: A varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.Behavior Research Methods. 2010;42:863-870.
29. Lau G. P.,Kay A. C.,Spencer S. J.Loving those who justify inequality: The effects of system threat on attraction to women who embody benevolent sexist ideals.Psychological Science. 2008;19:20-21.
30. *Le Y. -C. L.Social power and long term mate preferences. HI: University of Hawai'i; 2004:.
31. Lee T. L.,Fiske S. T.,Glick P.,Chen Z.Ambivalent sexism in close relationship: (Hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals.Sex Roles. 2010;62:583-601.
32. Li N. P.,Bailey J. M.,Kenrick D. T.,Linsenmeier J. A. W.The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:947-955.
33. Lipsey M. W.,Wilson D. B.Practical meta-analysis. London: Sage; 2001:.
34. Moya M.,Glick P.,Expósito F.,De Lemus S.,Hart J.It's for your own good: Benevolent Sexism and women's reactions to protectively justified restrictions.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007;33:1421-1434.
35. Muller D.,Judd C. M.,Yzerbyt V. Y.When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89:852-863.
36. Navarrete C. D.,McDonald M.,Molina L.,Sidanius J.Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An out-group male target hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;98:933-945.
37. Overall N. C.,Sibley C. G.,Tan R.The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. in press;:.
38. Overton R. C.A comparison of fixed-effects and random (mixed-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects.Psychological Methods. 1998;3:354-379.
39. Peterson B. E.,Duncan L. E.Midlife women's generativity and authoritarianism: Marriage, motherhood, and 10 years of aging.Psychology and Aging. 2007;22:411-419.
40. Pratto F.,Hegarty P.The political psychology of reproductive strategies.Psychological Science. 2000;11:57-62.
41. Pratto F.,Sidanius J.,Stallworth L.,Malle B.Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67:741-763.
42. Preacher K. J.,Rucker D. D.,Hayes A. F.Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007;42:185-227.
43. Raudenbush S. W.The handbook of research synthesis. Cooper H.Hedges L. V., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994:301-321.
44. Rudman L. A.,Glick P.The social psychology of gender. New York, NY: Guilford; 2008:.
45. Rudman L. A.,Heppen J. B.Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect?.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;29:1357-1370.
46. *Sibley C. G.[Sexism study, University of Auckland]. 2009a;:.
47. *Sibley C. G.[Sexism study, University of Auckland]. 2009b;:.
48. Sibley C. G.,Duckitt J.Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2008;12:248-279.
49. Sibley C. G.,Duckitt J.Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model.Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;149:545-561.
50. Sibley C. G.,Liu J. H.Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective.Political Psychology. 2010;31:175-207.
51. *Sibley C. G.,Overall N. C.[Sexism study, University of Auckland]. 2007;:.
52. Sibley C. G.,Wilson M. S.,Duckitt J.Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007;33:160-172.
53. Sidanius J.,Pratto F.Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
54. *Travaglia L. K.Ambivalent sexism, ideal standards and satisfaction within romantic relationships. New Zealand: University of Auckland; 2009:.
55. *Travaglia L. K.,Overall N. C.,Sibley C. G.Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners.Personality and Individual Differences. 2009;47:599-604.