Benevolent and Hostile Sexism and preferences for romantic partners

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 599-604

  Travaglia, Lucy K ^a   Overall, Nickola C ^a   Sibley, Chris G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Benevolent and Hostile Sexism; Ideal standards; Romantic partner preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649340801     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aiken L.S., and West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (1991), SAGE Publications, London, United Kingdom
2. Buss D.M. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (1999), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
3. Campbell L., Simpson J.A., Kashy D.A., and Fletcher G.J.O. Ideal standards, the self and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (2001) 447-462
4. Eagly A.H., and Wood W. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist 54 (1999) 408-423
5. Eastwick P.W., Eagly A.H., Glick P., Johannesen-Schmidt M.C., Fiske S.T., Blum A.M.B., et al. Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles 54 (2006) 603-614
6. Fletcher G.J.O. The new science of intimate relationships (2002), Blackwell, Cambridge
7. Fletcher G.J.O., Simpson J.A., Thomas G., and Giles L. Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 72-89
8. Fletcher G.J.O., Tither J.M., O'Loughlin C., Friesen M., and Overall N. Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (2004) 659-679
9. Forbes G.B., Collinsworth L.L., Jobe R.L., Braun K.D., and Wise L.M. Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs?. Sex Roles 56 (2007) 265-273
10. Glick P., Diebold J., Bailey-Werner B., and Zhu L. The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarised attitudes towards women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997) 1323-1334
11. Glick P., and Fiske S.T. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 491-512
12. Glick P., Fiske S.T., Masser B., Manganelli A.M., Huang L., Castro Y.R., et al. Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (2004) 713-728
13. Glick P., Fiske S.T., Mladinic A., Saiz J.L., Abrams D., Masser B., et al. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000) 763-775
14. Johannesen-Schmidt M.C., and Eagly A.H. Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 (2002) 322-328
15. Jost J.T., and Kay A.C. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (2005) 498-509
16. Overall N.C., Fletcher G.J.O., and Simpson J.A. Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 662-685
17. Rudman L.A., and Glick P. The social psychology of gender (2008), Guilford, NY
18. Rudman L.A., and Heppen J.B. Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 1357-1370
19. Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., and Duckitt J. Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (2007) 160-172