Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective

Political Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 175-207

  Sibley, Chris G ^a   Liu, James H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Dual process model; Personality; Prejudice; Social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952739264     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00748.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allport G. The nature of prejudice 1954, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
2. Altemeyer B. The other " authoritarian personality. Advances in experimental social psychology 1998, 47-92. Zanna M P. In, Ed., Vol. 30, pp., New York, Academic Press
3. Asch S E. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, leadership and men 1951, 177-190. Guetzkow H. In, Ed., pp., Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie Press
4. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment 1969/1982, 2nd, ed., New York, Basic Books
5. Cohrs J C, Asbrock F. Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 39:270-289.
6. Duckitt J. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in experimental social psychology 2001, 41-113. Zanna M P. In, Ed., Vol. 33, pp., New York, Academic Press
7. Duckitt J. Differential effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:684-696.
8. Duckitt J, Sibley C G. Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality 2007, 21:113-130.
9. Duckitt J, Sibley C G. A dual process model of ideological attitudes and system justification. Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification 2009a, 292-313. Jost J T, Kay A CThorisdottir H. In, Eds., pp., New York, Oxford University Press
10. Duckitt J, Sibley C G. Intergroup and individual difference determinants of prejudice: Testing a differential moderation hypothesis: Manuscript submitted for publication. 2009b
11. Duckitt J, Wagner C, du Plessis I, Birum I. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:75-93.
12. Dru V. Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: Effects of various self-categorization conditions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:877-883.
13. Ekehammar B, Akrami N. The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centred approach. European Journal of Personality 2003, 17:449-464.
14. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press
15. Guimond S, Dambrun M, Michinov N, Duarte S. Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:697-721.
16. Heaven P C L, St Quintin D. Personality factors predict racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 34:625-634.
17. Hox J. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications 2002, London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
18. Huang L L, Liu J H. Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences 2005, 38:267-276.
19. Kreindler S A. A dual group processes model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2005, 9:90-107.
20. Lehmiller J J, Schmitt M T. Group domination and inequality in context: Evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:704-724.
21. Levin S, Federico C M, Sidanius J, Rabinowitz J L. Social Dominance Orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:144-157.
22. Liu J H, Huang L L, McFedries C. Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in Social Dominance Orientation and Right Wing Authoritarianism as a function of political power and societal change. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 11:116-126.
23. Mirisola A, Sibley C G, Boca S, Duckitt J. On the ideological consistency between Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Personality and Individual Differences 2007, 43:1851-1862.
24. Mischel W, Shoda Y. Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The cognitive-affective personality system. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 1999, Pervin L A, John O P. In, Eds., New York, Guilford Press
25. Pierce T, Lydon J E. Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:613-631.
26. Poteat V P, Espelage D L, Green H D. The socialization of dominance: Peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:1040-1050.
27. Pratto F, Sidanius J, Levin S. Social Dominance Theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology 2006, 17:271-320.
28. Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth L M, Malle B F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:741-763.
29. Raudenbush S W, Bryk A S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications to data analysis methods 2002, 2nd, ed., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
30. Reynolds K J, Turner J C. Individuality and the prejudiced personality. European Review of Social Psychology 2006, 17:233-270.
31. Reynolds K J, Turner J C, Haslam A, Ryan M K. The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2001, 37:427-434.
32. Reynolds K J, Turner J C, Haslam A, Ryan M K, Bizumic B, Subasic E. Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 46:517-539.
33. Rosenthal R, Rosnow R L. Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis 1984, New York, McGraw-Hill
34. Rubin M, Hewstone M. Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology 2004, 25:823-844.
35. Schmitt M T, Branscombe N R. Will the real social dominance theory please stand up? British Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 42:215-219.
36. Schmitt M T, Branscombe N R, Kappen D M. Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 42:161-186.
37. Sibley C G, Duckitt J. Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12:248-279.
38. Sibley C G, Duckitt J. The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model: Political Psychology. in press
39. Sibley C G, Liu J H. New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:1222-1243.
40. Sibley C G, Overall N C. The boundaries between attachment and personality: Associations across three levels of the attachment network. Journal of Research in Personality 2007, 41:960-967.
41. Sibley C G, Overall N C. Modeling the hierarchical structure of attachment representations: A test of domain differentiation. Personality and Individual Differences 2008a, 44:238-249.
42. Sibley C G, Overall N C. The boundaries between attachment and personality: Localized versus generalized effects in daily social interaction. Journal of Research in Personality 2008b, 42:1394-1407.
43. Sibley C G, Robertson A, Wilson M S. Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects. Political Psychology 2006, 27:755-768.
44. Sibley C G, Wilson M S. Political attitudes and the ideology of equality: Differentiating support for liberal and conservative political parties in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology 2007, 36:72-84.
45. Sibley C G, Wilson M S, Duckitt J. Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation over a five-month period. Political Psychology 2007a, 28:357-371.
46. Sibley C G, Wilson M S, Duckitt J. Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007b, 33:160-172.
47. Sidanius J, Pratto F. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression 1999, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
48. Sidanius J, Pratto F, van Laar C, Levin S. Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology 2004, 25:845-880.
49. Turner J C, Reynolds K J. Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 42:199-206.
50. Verkuyten M, Hagendoorn L. Prejudice and self-categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and in-group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1998, 24:99-110.