Loving those who justify inequality: The effects of system threat on attraction to women who embody benevolent sexist ideals

Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 20-21

  Lau, Grace P ^a   Kay, Aaron C ^a   Spencer, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEFENSE MECHANISM; HUMAN; MALE; POLITICS; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CANADA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURE; HUMANS; MALE; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; RATIONALIZATION; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 37549061399     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02040.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Glick, P. Fiske, S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491 512.
2. Glick, P. Fiske, S.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109 118.
3. Glick, P., Fiske, S.T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J.L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al 2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763 775.
4. Hoffman, C. Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197 208.
5. Jackman, M.R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley : University of California Press.
6. Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R. Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881 920.
7. Jost, J.T. Kay, A.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498 509.
8. Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T., Mandisodza, A.N., Sherman, S.J., Petrocelli, J.V. Johnson, A.L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 305 358). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
9. Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T. Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240 246.
10. Vescio, T.K., Gervais, S.J., Snyder, M. Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658 672.