Collaborative argumentation and cognitive processing - An empirical study in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 661-670

  Stegmann, Karsten ^a   Wecker, Christof ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^a   Fischer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATIVE KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; COGNITIVE PROCESS; COGNITIVE PROCESSING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EMPIRICAL TEST; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 79958120453     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Andriessen, J. E. B., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen & M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 13, 175-193.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Bransford, J.D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C.D., & Stein, B.S. (1979). Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 331-354). Hillsdal e, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
6. Chinn, C. A., O'Donnell, A. M., & Jinks, T. S. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. TheJournal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 77-97.
7. Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present ⋯ and future? Memory, 10(5/6), 305-318.
8. de Grave, W. S., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2001). Effects of problem-based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical students. Instructional Science, 29(1), 33-44.
9. de Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
10. Hron, A., Hesse, F.-W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured cooperation in computer supported collaborative learning]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(1), 56-69.
11. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Learning to argue (Vol. 1, pp. 205-226). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational PsychologyReview, 18(2), 159-185.
13. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. (2003). Cooperation scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. In B. Wasson & R. Baggetun & U. Hoppe & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Computer Support for Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2003, COMMUNITY EVENTS - Communication and Interaction (pp. 59-60). Bergen, Norway: InterMedia.
14. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in webbased science learning at schools. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The next 10 Years (pp. 331-340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Koschmann, T. (2003). CSCL, argumentation and deweyan inquiry: argumentation is learning. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kuhn, D., & Goh, W. W. L. (2005). Arguing on the computer. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years (pp. 125-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 3, 287-315.
19. Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29, 127-153.
20. Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., & Salminen, T. (in press). Computer-based and face-to-face collaborative argumentation at secondary schools in England and Finland. Education, Communication & Information.
21. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Butler-Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interaction of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
22. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winton.
24. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
25. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and muli-dimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
26. Stein, B. S., & Bransford, J. D. (1979). Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 769-777.
27. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. van der Puil, C., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2004). Exploring Relational Regulation in Computer-Mediated (Collaborative) Learning Interaction: A Developmental Perspective. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 183-195.
29. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich. Available at: http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/Weinberger-Armin.pdf.
30. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95.
31. Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005a). Facilitating computer-supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in netwerk-based knowledge communication in groups. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2005b). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2005 (pp. 717-726). Taipei, TW: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.