Doctoral students writing: Where's the pedagogy?

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 413-425

  Cotterall, Sara ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Doctoral students; Higher education; Pedagogy; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957822379     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aitchison, C. 2010. Learning together to publish: Writing group pedagogies for doctoral publishing. In Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond, ed. C. Aitchison, B. Kamler and A. Lee, 83-100. New York: Routledge.
2. Aitchison, C., B. Kamler, and A. Lee. 2010. Introduction: Why publishing pedagogies? In Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond, ed. C. Aitchison, B. Kamler and A. Lee, 1-11. New York: Routledge.
3. Belcher, D., and A. Hirvela, eds. 2001. Voice in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10, no. 1/2, (Special issue).
4. Blinded Institution. 2010. Higher degree research guide for candidates and supervisors.
5. Blinded Institution Higher Degree Research Office. 2010. Higher degree research, data and reporting.
6. Caffarella, R.S., and B.G. Barnett. 2000. Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education 25: 39-51.
7. Duff, P. 2007. Problematising academic discourse socialisation. In Learning discourses and the discourses of learning, ed. H. Marriott, T. Moore and R. Spence-Brown, 1.1-1.18. Melbourne: Monash University Press.
8. Elton, L. 2010. Academic writing and tacit knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education 15: 151-60.
9. Fitzmaurice, M. 2010. Considering teaching in higher education as a practice. Teaching in Higher Education 15: 45-55.
10. Green, B. 2005. Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research and Development 24: 151-63.
11. Haksever, A.M., and E. Manisali. 2000. Assessing supervision requirements of PhD students: The case of construction management and engineering in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education 25: 19-32.
12. Ivanǐc, R. 1998. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Johnson, L., Lee, A., and Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education 25: 135-47.
14. Kamler, B., and P. Thomson. 2006. Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. London: Routledge.
15. Kiley, M. 2009. Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46: 293-304.
16. Lea, M.R. 2005. 'Communities of practice' in higher education. In Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context, ed. D. Barton and K. Tusting, 180-97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lee, A., and B. Kamler. 2008. Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teaching in Higher Education 13: 511-23.
18. Lea, M.R., and B. Street. 1998. Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23: 157-72.
19. Li, X. 2008. Learning to write a thesis with an argumentative edge. In Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders' reflections on academic enculturation, ed. C.P. Casanave and X. Li, 46-57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Lillis, T. 2001. Student writing: Access, regulation and desire. London: Routledge.
21. Merriam, S. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Paltridge, B., and S. Starfield. 2007. Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge.
23. Paré, A. 2010. Slow the presses: Concerns about premature publication. In Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond, ed. C. Aitchison, B. Kamler and A. Lee, 30-46. New York: Routledge.
24. Richardson, L. 1998. Writing: A method of inquiry. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 345-71. London: Sage.
25. Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.
26. Shen, F. 1998. The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition. In Negotiating academic literacies, ed. V. Zamel and R. Spack, 123-34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Simpson, S., and P.K. Matsuda. 2008. Mentoring as a long-term relationship: Situated learning in a doctoral program. In Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders' reflections on academic enculturation, ed. C.P. Casanave and X. Li, 90-104. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28. Sommers, N. and L. Saltz. 2004. The novice as expert: Writing in the freshman year. College Communication and Composition 56: 124-49.
29. Tardy, C.M. 2005. "It's like a story": Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 325-38.
30. Thein, A.H., and R. Beach. 2010. Mentoring doctoral students towards publication within scholarly communities of practice. In Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond, ed. C. Aitchison, B. Kamler and A. Lee, 117-36. London: Routledge.
31. Wellington, J. 2010. More than a matter of cognition: An exploration of affective writing problems of post-graduate students and their possible solutions. Teaching in Higher Education 15: 135-50.
32. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.