Academic writing and tacit knowledge

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 151-160

  Elton, Lewis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Tacit knowledge; Translating; Use of words

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951271801     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562511003619979     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Archer, L., M. Hutchings, and A. Ross. 2003. Higher education and social class. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
2. Argyris, C., and D. Schon. 1974. Theory in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Becher, T. 1989. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
5. Bransford, J.D., and D.L. Schwartz. 1999. Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In Review of research in education 24, ed. A. Iran-Nejad and P.D. Pearson, 61 100. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
6. Creme, P., and M.R. Lea. 1999. Student writing: Challenging the myths. In Academic writing development in higher education: Perspectives, explorations and approaches, ed. P. Thompson. Reading: CALS, University of Reading.
7. Collins Dictionary of the English Language. 1979. London and Glasgow: Collins.
8. Davies, S., D. Swinburne, and G. Williams, eds. 2006. Writing matters. London: Royal Literary Fund.
9. Ehrenberg, V.L. 1943. The people of aristophanes: A sociology of old attic comedy. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Eisner, E.W. 1985. The art of educational evaluation. London: Falmer Press.
11. Eraut, M. 2000. The dangers of managing with an inadequate view of knowledge. 3rd international conference for sociocultural research, 11 15 September, in Sao Paulo.
12. Eraut, M. 2002. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology 70: 113-36.
13. Giltrow, J. 2000. "Argument" as a term in talk about student writing. In Learning to argue in higher education ed. S. Mitchell and R. Andrews, part 11. Portsmouth: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
14. Giltrow, J., and M. Valiquette. 1994. Genres and knowledge: Student writing in the disciplines. In Learning and teaching genre, ed. A. Freedman and P. Medway, part 3. Portsmouth: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
15. Haggis, T. 2006. Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of "dumbing down". Studies in Higher Education 31: 521-35.
16. Husain, S., and R. Waterfield. 2006. Writing matters. In Writing matters, ed. S. Davies, D. Swinburne, and G. Williams, 27-33. London: Royal Literary Fund.
17. Hutchings, W., and K. O'Rourke. 2002. Introducing enquiry-based teaching methods in literary studies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 1: 73-83.
18. Hutchings, W., K. O'Rourke, and N.J. Powell. 2006. Case studies: CEEBL-supported projects 2005 2006. Manchester: Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning, University of Manchester.
19. Kureishi, H. 2007. The status of words. Amnesty Magazine, 141, January February.
20. Langenscheidts Taschenwoerterbuch der englishen Sprache. 1929. Langescheidtsche Verlags-buchhandlung.
21. Lea, M.R., and B.V. Street. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacy approach. Studies in Higher Education 23: 157-72.
22. Lillis, T., and J. Turner. 2001. Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6: 57-68.
23. McKenna, C. 2003. From skills to subjects; the reconceptualisation of writing development in higher education. In Improving student learning: Theory and practice, ed. C. Rust, 67-74. Oxford: OCSLD.
24. Mitchell, S. 2000. Putting argument into the mainstream. In Learning to argue in higher education, ed. S. Mitchell and R. Andrews, part 12. Portsmouth: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
25. Nesi, H., and S. Gardner. 2007. Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors' views on assessed writing tasks. In Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics. British Studies in Applied Linguistics, vol. 21, ed. R. Kiely, G. Clibbon, P. Rea-Dickins, and H. Woodfield, chapter 6. London: Equinox.
26. Nightingale, P. 1986. Improving student writing. Green Guide No 4. Adelaide, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
27. Nightingale, P. 1988. Understanding processes and problems in student writing. Studies in Higher Education 13: 266-83.
28. Polanyi, M. 1967. The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
29. Richardson, J.T.E. 1976. The grammar of justification. Brighton: Sussex University Press.
30. Sennett, R. 2008. The craftsman. London: Allen Lane.
31. Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Taylor, G. 1988. The literacy of knowing: Content and form in students' English. In Literacy by degrees, ed. G. Taylor. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
33. von Goethe, J.W. 1868. Saemtliche Werke: Im Anfang war die Tat, vol. 5: 40. Stuttgart: Cotta'sche Buchhandlung.