Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 511-523

  Lee, Alison ^a   Kamler, Barbara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Doctoral education; Doctoral pedagogy; Doctoral supervision; Writing for publication; Writing groups

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249110533     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510802334723     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aitchison, C. and Lee, A. (2006) Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11:3, pp. 265-278.
2. Boud, D. and Lee, A. (2005) Peer learning as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30:5, pp. 501-515.
3. Christie, F. (2002) Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective, Continuum, London
4. Dinham, S. and Scott, C. (2001) The experience of disseminating the results of doctoral research. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25:1, pp. 45-55.
5. European University Association (2005) Doctoral programmes for the European knowledge society: Final report, European University Association, Brussels, Belgium
6. Faculty of Medicine, Monash University (2007) Transitions: Health and mobility in Asia and the Pacific
7. Freebody, P., Ludwig, C. and Gunn, S. (1995) Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socio-economic urban communities, Department of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra, ACT
8. Kamler, B. and Thomson, P. (2006) Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision, Routledge, London
9. Kamler, B. (2008) Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33:3, pp. 293-294.
10. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. Lee, A. and Boud, D. (2003) Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28:2, pp. 187-200.
12. Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking science: Language, learning and values, Ablex, Norwood, NJ
13. Lemke, J. L. (1995) Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics, Taylor & Francis, London
14. Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E. and Lee, A. (2008) 'Becoming and being writers': The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30:2
15. McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M. and Jones, R. (2005) Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25:1, pp. 19-36.
16. Mehan, H. (1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Nasaji, N. and Wells, G. (2000) What's the use of triadic dialogue? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21:3, pp. 376-406.
18. Page-Adams, D., Cheng, L. C., Gogineni, A. and Shen, C. Y. (1995) Establishing a group to encourage writing for publication among doctoral students. Journal of Social Work Education, 31:3, pp. 402-407.
19. Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S. (2007) Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors, Routledge, London
20. Powell, S. (2004) The PhD by published work
21. Rose, D. (2004) Learning to read: Reading to learn, teacher training manual, University of Sydney, Sydney
22. Stenhouse, L. (1981) What counts as research?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 29:2, pp. 103-114.
23. Swales, J. and Feak, C. (2004) Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
24. Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic enquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge