More than a matter of cognition: An exploration of affective writing problems of post-graduate students and their possible solutions

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 135-150

  Wellington, Jerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affective domain; Cognition; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951600073     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562511003619961     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aitchison, C., and A. Lee. 2006. Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 3: 265-78.
2. Bazerman, C. 1983. Scientific writing as a social act. In New essays in technical writing and communication, ed. P. Anderson, J. Brockman, and C. Miller, 156-84. New York: Baywood.
3. Becker, H. 1986. Writing for social scientists. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4. BERA. 2000. Good practice in educational research writing. Southwell: British Educational Research Association.
5. Bereiter, C., and M. Scardamalia. 1987. The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bharuthram, S., and S. McKenna. 2006. A writer-respondent intervention as a means of developing academic literacy. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 4: 495-507.
7. Bloom, B.A., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objections, the classification of educational goals Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
8. Bourdieu, P. 1996. The rules of art: Genesis and the structure of the literary field. Trans. S. Emanuel. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Brennan, T. 2004. The transmission of affect. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10. Caffarella, R.S., and B.G. Barnet. 2000. Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education 25, no. 1: 39-52.
11. Chanock, K. 2000. Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education 5, no. 1: 95-105.
12. Cryer, P. 2000. The research student's guide to success, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
13. Elbow, P. 1973. Writing without teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 150 J. Wellington
14. Elbow, P. 1981. Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Elbow, P. 1987. Closing my eyes as I speak: An argument for ignoring audience. College English 49: 50-69.
16. Hyatt, D. 2005. 'Yes, a very good point!': A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education 10, no. 3: 339-53.
17. Ivanic, R. 1998. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Kearns, H., M. Gardiner, and K. Marshall. 2008. Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research and Development 27, no. 1: 77-89.
19. Kratwohl, D.R., B.S. Bloom, and B. Masia. 1964. Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: McKay.
20. Lea, M., and B. Street. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23, no. 2: 157-72.
21. Lillis, T. 2001. Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
22. Lillis, T., and J. Turner. 2001. Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6, no. 1: 57-68.
23. Moore, S. 2003. Writers' retreats for academics: Exploring and increasing the motivation to write. Journal of Further and Higher Education 27, no. 3: 333-42.
24. Murray, R. 2002. How to write a thesis. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
25. Nightingale, P. 1988. Understanding processes and problems in student writing. Studies in Higher Education 13, no. 3: 262-80.
26. Richardson, L. 1998. Writing: A method of inquiry. In Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 346 71. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
27. Rose, M. 1980. Rigid rules, inflexible plans and the stifling of language: A cognitivist analysis of writers block. College Composition and Communication 31: 389-401.
28. Scherer, K.R. 1984. On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In Approaches to emotion, ed. K.R. Scherer and P. Ekman, 293-317. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Somerville, E., and P. Crème. 2005. 'Asking Pompeii questions': A co-operative approach to writing in the disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education 10, no. 1: 17-28.
30. Torrance, M., G.V. Thomas, and E.J. Robinson. 1992. The writing experiences of Social Science Research students. Studies in Higher Education 17, no. 2: 155-67.
31. Torrance, M.S., and G.V. Thomas. 1994. The development of writing skills in doctoral research students. In Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences, ed. B. Robert, 105-23. London and Bristol: Jessica Kingsley.
32. Varlander, S. 2008. The role of students' emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education 13. no. 2: 145-56.
33. Vygotsky, L. 1962. Thought and language. Trans. E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34. Wellington, J. 2003. Getting published. London: Routledge.
35. Wellington, J., A. Bathmaker, C. Hunt, G. McCulloch, and P. Sikes. 2005. Succeeding with your doctorate. London: Sage.
36. Wolcott, H. 1990. Writing up qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Woods, P. 1999. Successful writing for qualitative researchers. London: Routledge.