Publication and citation analysis as a tool for information retrieval

Social Information Retrieval Systems: Emerging Technologies and Applications for Searching the Web Effectively

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 252-268

  Rousseau, Ronald ^a  

^a Associatie KULeuven   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957616501     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-543-6.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Almind, T.C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analysis on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to Webometrics. Journal of Documentation, 53, 404-426.
2. Atkins, H. (1999). The ISI Web of scienceilinks and electronic journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5(9). Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september99/atkins/09atkins.html.
3. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63, 829-846.
4. Bayer, A.E., Smart, J.C., & McLaughlin, G.W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 444-452.
5. Björneborn, L. (2004). Small-world link structures across an academic Web space: A library and information science approach. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Denmark.
6. Björneborn, L. (2005). Identifying small-world connectors across an academic Web spaceia Webometric study. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005 (pp. 55-66). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.
7. Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2001). Perspectives of Webometrics. Scientometrics, 50, 65-82.
8. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J.A., & Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1419-1440.
9. Borgman, C.L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (vol. 36, pp. 3-72). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
10. Bosc, H., & Harnad, S. (2005). In a paperless world a new role for academic libraries: Providing open access. Learned Publishing, 18, 95-99.
11. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 351-374.
12. Braam, R.R., Moed, H.F., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991a). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. I: Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 233-251.
13. Braam, R.R., Moed, H.F., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991b). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 252-266.
14. Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A., & Wiener, J. (2000). Graph structure in the Web. Computer Networks, 33, 309-320.
15. Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1060-1072.
16. Brody, T., Kampa, S., Harnad, S., Carr, L., & Hitchock, S. (2003). Digitometric services for open archives environments. In T. Troch & I.T. Sølvberg (Eds.), Research and advanced technology for digital libraries (pp. 207-220). Berlin: Springer-Verlag (LNCS 2769).
17. Chen, C. (1999a). Information visualisation and virtual environments. London: Springer.
18. Chen, C. (1999b). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing and Management, 35, 401-420.
19. Chen, C., & Paul, R.J. (2001). Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Computer, 34(3), 65-71.
20. Chen, L., & Rousseau, R. (in press). Q-measures for binary divided networks: Bridges between German and English institutes in publications of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Scientometrics.
21. Cozzens, S. (1989). What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics, 15, 437-447.
22. Cronin, B. (2005). Warm bodies, cold facts: The embodiment and emplacement of knowledge claims. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005 (pp. 1-12). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.
23. Dean, J., & Henzinger, M.R. (1999). Finding related pages in the World Wide Web. Computer Networks, 31, 1467-1479.
24. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (2000). Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987-1997. Scientometrics, 47, 55-73.
25. Egghe, L., Rao, Ravichandra I.K., & Sahoo, B.B. (2006). Proof of a conjecture of Moed and Garfield on authoritative references and extension to non-authoritative references. Scientometrics, 66, 537-549.
26. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics. Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55, 349-361.
28. Flom, P.L., Friedman, S.R., Strauss, S., & Neaigus, A. (2004). A new measure of linkage between two sub-networks. Connections, 26(1), 62-70.
29. Frandsen, T.F., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 58-62.
30. Garfield, E. (1988). Announcing the SCI compact disc edition: CD-ROM gigabyte storage technology, novel software, and bibliographic coupling make desktop research and discovery a reality. Current Contents, 22(May 30).
31. Garner, R. (1967). A computer oriented graph theoretic analysis of citation index structures. In B. Flood (ed.), Three Drexel information science studies (pp. 1-46). Philadelphia, Drexel Institute of Technology.
32. th International Annual IPSERA Conference, Jönköping, Sweden.
33. Gilbert, G.N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-122.
34. Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54, 236-243.
35. Ingwersen, P., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Methodological issues of Webometric studies. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 339-369). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Jansz, C.N.M. (2000). Some thoughts on the interaction between scientometrics and science and technology policy. Scientometrics, 47, 253-264.
37. Jin, B.H., & Wang, B. (1999). Chinese Science Citation Database: Its construction and application. Scientometrics, 45, 325-332.
38. Kessler, M.M. (1962). An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers. Report, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
39. Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
40. Kim, E.H., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2006). Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? NBER Working Paper Series 12245.
41. Kleinberg, J.M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604-632.
42. Kretschmer, H. (1997). Patterns of behaviour in co-authorship networks of invisible colleges. Scientometrics, 40, 579-591.
43. Kretschmer, H. (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distance in co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60, 409-420.
44. Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, U., & Kretschmer, T. (2005). Visibility of collaboration between immunology institutions on the Web including aspects of gender studies. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005 (pp. 750-760). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.
45. Kreuzman, H. (2001). A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examin ing the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science. Scientometrics, 51, 525-539.
46. Larson, R.R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. In S. Hardin (Ed.), Global complexity: Information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the ASIS. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://sherlock.berkeley.edu/asis96/asis96.html
47. Lempel, R., & Moran, S. (2001). SALSA: The stochastic approach for link-structure analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 19, 131-160.
48. Leydesdorff, L. (2003). Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? Journal of Documentation, 59, 84-104.
49. Leydesdorff, L. (2004a). Clusters and maps of science journals on bi-connected graphs in the Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation, 60, 371-427.
50. Leydesdorff, L. (2004b). Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics, 60, 159-180.
51. Leydesdorff, L. (2004c). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 991-1001.
52. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 601-613.
53. Leydesdorff, L., & Hellsten, I. (2005). Metaphors and diaphors in science communication: Mapping the case of stem-cell research. Science Communication, 27, 64-99.
54. Leydesdorff, L., & Hellsten, I. (2006). Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about 'Monarch butterflies', 'Frankenfoods', and 'stem cells'. Scientometrics, 67, 231-258.
55. Leydesdorff, L., & Jin, B.H. (2005). Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 1469-1479.
56. Lin, Y., & Kaid, L.L. (2000). Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence. Scientometrics, 47, 143-164.
57. th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface (IUI), Funchal, Portugal.
58. Liu, Z., & Wang, C.Z. (2005). Mapping interdisciplinarity in demography: A journal network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31, 308-316.
59. Maes, P. (1994). Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 30-40.
60. Marion, L.S., & McCain, K.W. (2001). Contrasting views of software engineering journals: Author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 297-308.
61. Marshakova, I.V.(1973). System of document connections based on references (in Russian). Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, 2(6), 3-8.
62. McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433-443.
63. McCain, K.W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 290-296.
64. McCain, K.W. (1995). The structure of biotechnology R&D. Scientometrics, 32, 153-175.
65. McNee, S.M., Albert, I., Cosley, D., Gopalkrishnan, P., Lam, S.K., Rashid, Konstan, J.A, & Riedl, J. (2002). On the recommending of citations for research papers. Proceedings of CSCW'02 (pp. 116-125), New Orleans, LA.
66. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
67. Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
68. Moed, H.F., & Garfield, E. (2004). In basic science the percentage of 'authoritative' references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics, 60, 295-303.
69. Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
70. Narin, F., Breitzman, A., & Thomas, P. (2004). Using patent citation indicators to manage a stock portfolio. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 553-568). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
71. Newman, M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167-256.
72. Persson. O. (2000). The literature climate of Umeåimapping public library loans. Bibliometric Notes, 4(5). Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://www.umu.se/inforsk/Bibliometric-Notes/BN5-2000/BN5-2000.htm
73. Persson, O. (2001). All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics, 50, 339-344.
74. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976).Citation influences for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with applications to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297-312.
75. Price, D.J., de Solla (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
76. th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (pp. 587-596). Sydney: BIRG.
77. Rodríguez i Gairín, J.M. (1997). Valorando el impacto de la información en Internet: AltaVista, el 'Citation Index' de la Red. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Scientifica, 20, 175-181.
78. Rosengren, K.E. (1966). The literary system. Unpublished Licentiate Thesis in Sociology, University of Lund, Sweden.
79. Rosengren, K.E. (1968). Sociological aspects of the literary system. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
80. Rousseau, R., & Small, H. (2005). Escher staircases dwarfed. ISSI Newsletter, 1(4), 8-10.
81. Rousseau, R., & Thelwall. M. (2004). Escher staircases on the World Wide Web. FirstMonday, 9(6). Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_6/rousseau/index.html
82. Rousseau, R., & Zuccala, A. (2004). A classification of author co-citations: Definitions and search strategies. Journal of the American Society of In formation Science and Technology, 55, 513-529.
83. Russell, J.M., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation. In R. Arvantis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Part 19.3: Science and technology policy. Oxford, UK: EOLSS.
84. Schneider, J.W. (2005). Naming clusters in visualization studies: Parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005 (pp. 406-416). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.
85. Sen, S.K., & Gan, S.K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30, 78-82.
86. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
87. Steiner, U., & Stanier, C. (2006). Soft matter: The essential ingredient for success. Soft Matter, 2, 9-11.
88. Stix, G. (2006). The elusive goal of machine translation. Scientific American, 294(3), 70-73.
89. Thelwall. M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
90. Thelwall. M. (2006). Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 60-68.
91. Thelwall. M., & Harries, G. (2004). Do the Web sites of higher rated scholars have significantly more online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 149-159.
92. Thelwall. M., & Vaughan, M. (2004). A fair history of the Web? Examining country balance in the Internet Archive. Library & Information Science Research, 26, 162-176.
93. Thelwall. M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 81-135.
94. Thelwall. M., & Wilkinson, D. (2004). Finding similar academic Web sites with links, bibliometric coupling and colinks. Information Processing and Management, 40, 515-526.
95. Tijssen, R., Buter, R.K., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47, 389-412.
96. Van Impe, S., & Rousseau, R. (2006). Web-to-print citations and the humanities. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57, 422-426.
97. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1313-1322.
98. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2005). Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 1075-1087.
99. Vaughan, L., & Thelwall. M. (2004). Search engine coverage bias: Evidence and possible causes. Information Processing and Management, 40, 693-707.
100. Wagner, C.S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608-1618.
101. White, H.D. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The Web of knowledge; a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 475-496). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
102. White, H.D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 87-108.
103. White, H.D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 423-434.
104. White, H.D., & Griffith, B. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-171.
105. White, H.D., & McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355.
106. White, H.D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 111-126.
107. Wilson, C.S. (1999). Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107-247.
108. Wu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., Pang, J., Guo, H., Xu, B., & Yang, Z. (2004). China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations (CSTPC): History, impact and outlook. Scientometrics, 60, 385-394.
109. Yin, L.C., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R.A., & Liu, Z.Y. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing & Management, 42, 1599-1613.
110. Zuccala, A. (2006a). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 152-168.
111. Zuccala, A. (2006b). Author cocitation analysis is to intellectual structure as Web cocitation analysis is to...? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1486-1501.