Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about 'Monarch butterflies,' 'Frankenfoods,' and 'stem cells'

Scientometrics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 231-258

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Hellsten, Iina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746253863     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0096-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. AHLGREN, P., B. JARNEVING, R. ROUSSEAU (2003), Requirement for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (6): 550-560.
2. BAILÓN-MORENO, R., E. JURADO-ALMEDA, R. RUIZ-BAÑOS, J.-P. COURTIAL (2005), Analysis of the field of physical chemistry of surfactants with the United Scientometric Model: Fit of relational and activity indicators. Scientometrics, 63 (2): 259-276.
3. BAR-HILLEL, Y. (1955), An examination of information theory. Phil. Sci., 22: 86-105.
4. BAR-ILAN, J. (2001), Data collection methods on the web for informetric purposes - A review and analysis. Scientometrics, 50 (1): 7-32.
5. BERNSTEIN, B. (1971), Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 1: Theoretical Studies in the Sociology of Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. BRILLOUIN, L. (1962), Science and Information Theory. New York: Academic Press.
7. BOOKSTEIN, A., S. T. KLEIN, T. RAITA (1995). Detecting Content-Bearing Words by Serial Clustering. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Seattle, WA: ACM Press.
8. BURT, R. S. (1982), Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York, etc.: Academic Press.
9. BURT, R. S. (1983), Network data from archival records. In: R. S. BURT, M. J. MINOR (Eds), Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, Beverly Hills, etc.: Sage, pp. 158-174.
10. CALLON, M., J.-P. COURTIAL, W. A. TURNER, S. BAUIN (1983), From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22: 191-235.
11. CALLON, M., J. LAW, A. RIP (Eds) (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.
12. CALLON, M., J. P. COURTIAL, F. LA VILLE (1991), Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22 (1):155-205.
13. CHEN, CH. (2003), Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. London: Springer.
14. CONDIT, C., B. BATES, R. GALLOWAY, S. BROWN GIVENS, C. HAYNIE, J. JORDAN, G. STABLES, H. MARSHALL WEST (2002), Recipes or blueprints for our genes? How contexts selectively activate the multiple meanings of metaphors. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88 (3): 303-325.
15. COSER, R. L. (1975), The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. In: L. A. COSER (Ed.), The Idea, of Social Structure. Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, New York/Chicago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 237-264.
16. FAUCONNIER, G., M. TURNER (2002), The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books.
17. FRY, J. (2006), Scholarly research and information practices: A domain analytic approach. Information Processing and Management, 42 (1): 299-316.
18. GRANOVETTER, M. S. (1973), The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360-1380.
19. HAMERS, L., Y. HEMERYCK, G. HERWEYERS, M. JANSSEN, H. KETERS, R. ROUSSEAU (1989), Similarity measures in scientometric research: The Jaccard Index versus Salton's cosine formula. Information Processing & Management, 25 (3): 315-318.
20. HELLSTEN, I. (2003), Focus on metaphors: The case of 'Frankenfood' on the web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8 (4) July. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmcA/vol8/issue4/hellsten.html
21. HELLSTEN, I., L. LEYDESDORFF, P. WOUTERS (forthcoming), Multiple presents: How search engines re-write the past. New Media & Society, In print.
22. JAKULIN, A., I. BRATKO (2004), Quantifying and Visualizing Attribute Interactions: An Approach Based on Entropy, at http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.Al/ 0308002
23. JONES, W. P., G. W. FURNAS (1987), Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (6): 420-442.
24. KAMADA, T., S. KAWAI (1989), An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31 (1):7-15.
25. KENNEDY, G. (1998), An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics, London: Longman.
26. KIM, S., D. A. SCHEUFELE, J. E. SHANAHAN (2002), Agenda-setting, priming, framing and second-levels in local politics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79 (1): 7-25.
27. KLEIN, H. (2004), Overview on standardised category systems in computed aided content analysis. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Logic and Methodology. Amsterdam, August 16-20, 2004.
28. KRIPPENDORFF, K. (1980), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. LAKOFF, G., M. JOHNSON (1980), Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. LATOUR, B. (1996), Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press.
31. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1989), Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy, 18: 209-223.
32. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1991), In search of epistemic networks, Social Studies of Science, 21:75-110.
33. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1992), A validation study of LEXIMAPPE, Scientometrics, 25 (2): 295-312.
34. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1996), Luhmann's sociological theory: Its operationalization and future perspectives. Social Science Information, 35: 283-306.
35. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1997), Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (5): 418-427.
36. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2003), The mutual information of University-Industry- Government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58 (2): 445-467.
37. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2004), The University-Industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55 (11): 991-1001.
38. LEYDESDORFF, L. (forthcoming), Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (in print).
39. LEYDESDORFF, L., I. HELLSTEN (2005), Metaphors and diaphors in science communication: Mapping the case of 'stem-cell research', Science Communication, 27 (1): 64-99.
40. LEYDESDORFF, L., L. VAUGHAN (forthcoming), Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, In print.
41. LOSEY, J. E., L. S. RAYOR, M. E. CARTER (1999), Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399: 214.
42. LUHMANN, N. (1984), Soziale Systeme. Grundriβ einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
43. LUHMANN, N. (1986), The autopoiesis of social systems. In: F. GEYER, J. V. D. ZOUWEN (Eds), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, London: Sage, pp. 172-192.
44. LUHMANN, N. (1990), The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown. In: W. KROHN, G. KÜPPERS, H. NOWOTNY (Eds), Selforganization. Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 64-85.
45. MAASEN, S., P. WEINGART (1995), Metaphors - Messengers of meaning. A contribution to an evolutionary sociology of science. Science Communication, 17 (1): 9-31.
46. MAASEN, S., P. WEINGART (2000), Metaphors and the Dynamics of Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.
47. MACKAY, D. M. (1969), Information, Mechanism and Meaning. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
48. MACKENZIE, A. (2001), The technicity of time. Time & Society, 10 (2/3): 235-257.
49. McINERNEY, C., N. BIRD, M. NUCCI (2004), The flow of scientific knowledge from the lab to the lay public. The case of genetically modified food. Science Communication, 26 (1): 44-74.
50. MICHELET, B. (1988). L'analyse des associations. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Université Paris VII, Paris.
51. MITROFF, I.I. (1974), The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
52. NISBET, M. C., D. BROSSARD, A. KROEPSCH (2003), Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Press/Politics, 8 (2): 36-70.
53. NUCCI, M. (2004), From Science Article to the Public Press: A Case Study of Frames and Rhetoric. Paper presented at the ICA conference, New Orleans, USA, May 26-31, 2004.
54. OSGOOD, C. E., G. SUCI, P. TANNENBAUM (1957), The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
55. PAN, Z., G. M. KOSICKI (1993), Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10:55-76.
56. RIKKEN, F. (1998), Adverse Drug Reactions in a Different Context. State University Groningen, Groningen.
57. RIKKEN, F., H. A. L. JIERS, R. Vos (1995), Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL. Scientometrics, 33 (3): 367-380.
58. ROUSSEAU, R. (1999), Daily time series of common single word searches in Altavista and Northernlight, Cybermetrics, 2/3, Paper 2 at 〈http://www. cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articlea/v2i1p2.html〉.
59. RUIZ-BAN̄OS, R., R. BAILÓN-MORENO, E. JIMÉNEZ- CONTRERAS, J.-P. COURTIAL (1999), Structure and dynamics of scientific networks. Part I: Fundamentals of the quantitative model of translation. Scientometrics, 44 (2): 217-234.
60. SALTON, G., M. J. MCGILL (1983), Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval Auckland, etc.: McGraw-Hill.
61. STEGMANN, J., GROHMANN, G. (2003), Hypothesis generation guided by co-word clustering. Scientometrics, 56(1): 111-135.
62. SWANSON, D. R. (1990), Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 78: 29-37.
63. SWANSON, D. R., N. R. SMALHEISER (1999), Implicit text linkages between Medline records: Using Arrowsmith as an aid to scientific discovery. Library Trends, 48: 48-59.
64. TEIL, G., B. LATOUR (1995), The Hume machine. Can association networks do more than formal rules? Stanford Electronic Humanities Review, 4 (2). Available at http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/4-2/text/teil-latour.html
65. THEIL, H. (1972), Statistical Decomposition Analysis. Amsterdam/ London: North-Holland.
66. THELWALL, M. (2001), The responsiveness of search engine indexes. Cybermetrics, 5 (1), http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v5i1p1.html
67. WEELWRIGHT, P. (1962), Metaphor and Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
68. WERTZ, D. C. (2002), Embryo and stem cell research in the USA: A political history. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 8 (3): 143-148.
69. WHITLEY, R. D. (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. WOUTERS, P., I. HELLSTEN, L. LEYDESDORFF (2004), Internet time and the reliability of search engines, First Monday, 9 (10), October 2004.
71. ZINKEN J., I. HELLSTEN, B. NERLICH (in press), Discourse metaphors, Forthcoming in: Body, Language and Mind. Volume 2: Sociocultural Situatedness, R. FRANK, R. DIRVEN, J. ZLATEV, T. ZIEMKE (Eds), Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
72. ZITT, M., E. BASSECOULARD, Y. OKUBO (2000), Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47 (3): 627-657.