Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 58-62

  Frandsen, Tove Faber ^a   Rousseau, Ronald ^b,c  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

^b Katholieke Hogeschool Brugge Oostende   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; GLOSSARIES; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ARTICLES; CHINESE SCIENCE CITATION DATABASE (CSCD); CITATION PERIODS; CITATIONS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 11144347639     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20100     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barnaby, D.P., & Gallagher, E.J. (1998). Alternative to the Science Citation Index impact factor as an assessment of emergency medicine's scientific contributions. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 31, 78-86.
2. Bonnevie, E. (2003). A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: The case of the Journal of Information Science. Journal of Information Science, 29, 11-23.
3. Bordons, M., Fernandez, M.T., & Gömez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53, 195-206.
4. de Bruin, R.E., Kint, A., Luwel, M., & Moed, H.F. (1993) A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent. Research Evaluation, 3, 25-41.
5. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A general framework for relative impact indicators. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27, 29-48.
6. Garfield, E. (1998). Long-term vs. short-term journal impacts: Does it matter? The Scientist, 12(3), 10-12.
7. Garfield, E., & Sher, I.H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14, 195-201.
8. Glänzel, W., Danell, R., & Persson, O. (2003). The decline of Swedish neuroscience: Decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator. Scientometrics, 57, 197-213.
9. Glänzel, W., & Moed, H.F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53, 171-193.
10. Golder, W. (2000). Werr kontrolliert die Kontrolleure? Zehn Thesen zum sogenannten Impact Factor [Who controls the controllers? Ten statements on the so-called impact factor]. Onkologie, 23, 73-75.
11. Hirst, G. (1978). Discipline impact factors - Method for determining core journal lists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29, 171-172.
12. Ingwersen P., Larsen B., Rousseau R., & Russell J. (2001). The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46, 524-528.
13. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., & Wormell, I. (2000). Applying diachronic citation analysis to ongoing research program evaluations In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
14. Jin, B., & Wang, B. (1999). Chinese science citation database: Its construction and application. Scientometrics, 45, 325-332.
15. Jin, B., Zhang, J., Chen, D., & Zhu, X. (2002). Development of the Chinese Scientometric Indicators (CSI). Scientometrics, 54, 145-154.
16. Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). (1993). Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster. Retrieved October 11, 2003, from http://www.m-w.com/cgi- bin/dictionary
17. Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14, 131-149.
18. Rinia, E., van Leeuwen, T., Bruins, E., van Vuren, H. & van Raan, A. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54, 347-362.
19. Rousseau, R. (1988). Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 249-262). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Rousseau, R. (1997). The proceedings of the first and second international conferences on bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics: A data analysis. In B. Peritz & L. Egghe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 371-380). Jerusalem, Israel: The School of Library, Archive and Information Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
21. Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50(3), 418-439.
22. Rousseau, R., Jin, B., Yang, N., & Liu, X. (2001). Observations concerning the two- and three-year synchronous impact factor, based on the Chinese Science Citation Index. Journal of Documentation, 57, 349-357.
23. Seglen, P.O. (1977). Whe the Impact Factor should not be used for evaluation research. British Medical Journal, 314, 497-502.
24. Stegmann, J. (1999). Building a list of journals with constructed impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 55, 310-324.
25. Todorov, R., & Glänzel, W. (1988). Journal citation measures: A concise review. Journal of Information Science, 14, 47-56.
26. Wilson, C.S. (1999). Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107-247.
27. Wu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., Pang, J., Guo, H. et al. (2003). China scientific and technical papers and citations (CSTPC): History, impact and outlook. In G. Jiang, R. Rousseau, & Y. Wu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 352-361). Dalian: Dalian Technological University Press.