Visibility of collaboration between immunology institutions on the web including aspects of gender studies

Proceedings of ISSI 2005: 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 750-760

  Kretschmer, Hildrun ^a,b,c   Kretschmer, Ute ^d   Kretschmer, Theo ^c  

^a ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c COLLNET Center ^*  (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349086729     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Beaver, D. deB., (2001). Reflections on scientific collaborations (and its study): Past, present and prospective. Scientometrics, 52, 365-377.
2. Glänzel, W. & A. Schubert (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H.F. Moed et. al. (Eds.), Handbook of QuantitativeScience and Technology Research, (pp.257-276), The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Glaenzel, W. & C. de Lange (1997). Modeling and Measuring Multilateral Co-authorship in International Scientific Collaboration. Part II. A comparative study on the extent and change of international scientific collaboration links. Scientometrics 40, 605-626
4. Kretschmer H. (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distances in bibliographic coauthorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics.60, 409-420
5. Kretschmer, H. & I.F. Aguillo (2004). Visibility of collaboration on the Web. Scientometrics. 61, 405-426
6. Kretschmer, H. & I.F. Aguillo (2005). New Indicators for Gender Studies in Web Networks. Information Processing and Management. (accepted)
7. Kretschmer, H., U. Kretschmer and T Kretschmer (2005). Reflection of co-authorship networks in the Web: Web hyperlinks versus Web visibility rates. In Proceedings of the 5th Triple Helix Conference, Turin, May 18-21, 2005 (accepted)
8. Luukkonen T., Persson O., Silvertse G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration.Science, Technology Q Human Values, 17, 101-126
9. Naldi, F., D. Luzi, A. Valente, I. V. Parenti (2004). Scientific and technological performance by gender. In H.F. Moed et. al. (Eds.), Handbook of QuantitativeScience and Technology Research, (pp.299-314), The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
10. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA, 98, 404-409
11. Okubo Y., J.F. Miquel, L. Frigoletto, J.C. Doré (1992). Structure of International Collaboration in Science; Typology of Countries through Multivariate Techniques using a Link Indicator. Scientometrics 25, 321-351.
12. Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28, 443-455
13. Price, D. de Solla (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia Univ. Press Sabidussi, G. (1966 The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika. 31, 581-603
14. Tijssen, R. J. W. & H. F. Moed (1989). Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden: DSWO Press
15. Vaughan, L. and Shaw, D. (2003) Bibliographic and Web Citations: What Is the Difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1313-1322.
16. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994
17. Zitt M., E. Bassecoulard, Y. Okubo (2000). Shadows of the Past in International Cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47, 627-657