Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence

Scientometrics

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 143-164

  Lin, Yang ^a   Kaid, Lynda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002768988     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005678011835     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. BAYER, A. E., SMART, J. C., MCLAUGHUN, G. W. (1990), Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 444-452.
2. BENIGER, J. R, (1990), Identifying the important theorists of communication: Use of latent measures to test manifest assumptions in scholarly communication. In: C. BORGMAN (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Blbliometrics (pp. 254-277). Newfoury Park, CA: Sage.
3. BROOKS, T. A. (1988), Citer motivations. In: A. KENT (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (Vol. 43, supp. 8) (pp. 48-59). NY: Marcel Dekker.
4. CHUBIN, D. E., MOITRA, S. D. (1975), Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441.
5. DELIA, J, G. (1987), Communication research: A history, In: C. BEROER & S. CHAFFEE (Eds), Handbook of Communication Science, (pp. 20-98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. FRANKLIN, B. (1995), Political communication scholarship in Britain. Political Communication, 12, 223-242.
7. FRENTZ, H. (1995), SSCA presidential address explores dark questions and seeks to hunt our hunters. Spectra, 2, 16-17.
8. FUNKHOUSER, E. T. (1996), The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-564.
9. GRABER, D. A. (1993), Political communication: Scope, progress, promise. In: A. FINIFTER (Ed.), Political Science: The Slate of the Discipline II (pp. 305-332). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.