Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches

Scientometrics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 159-180

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243146150     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027678.31097.e0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AHLGREN, P., B. JARNEVING, R. ROUSSEAU (2003), Requirement for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (6): 550-560.
2. BORGATTI, S. P., M. G. EVERETT, L. C. FREEMAN (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
3. BURT, R. S. (1982), Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York, etc.: Academic Press.
4. CARPENTER, M. P., F. NARIN (1973), Clustering of scientific journals, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 24: 425-436.
5. DOREIAN, P., T. J. FARARO (1985), Structural equivalence in a journal network. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 36: 28-37.
6. FRUCHTERMAN, T., E. REINGOLD (1991), Graph drawing by force-directed replacement. Software - Practice and Experience, 21: 1129-1166.
7. GIBBONS, M., C. LIMOGES, H. NOWOTNY, S. SCHWARTZMAN, P. SCOTT, M. TROW (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
8. KAMADA, T., S. KAWAI (1989), An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31 (1): 7-15.
9. KNASTER, B., C. KURATWOSKI (1921), Sur les ensembles connexes. Fund. Math., 2: 206-255.
10. KUHN, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. KUHN, T. S. (1977), The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
12. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1987), Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics, 11: 291-320.
13. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1995), The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. Leiden: DSWO/Leiden University; at 〈http://www.upublish.com/books/leydesdorff-sci. htm〉
14. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2001), A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society. Parkland, FL: Universal Publishers; at 〈http://www.upublish.com/books/leydesdorff.htm〉
15. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2002), Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12): 987-994.
16. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2003a), Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? Journal of Documentation, 59 (1): 84-104.
17. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2003b), The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems. Canadian Journal of Communication, 28 (3): 1-23.
18. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2004), Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in the Journal Citation Reports (Journal of Documentation, 60 (4), forthcoming).
19. LEYDESDORFF, L., R. ZAAL (1988), Co-words and citations. Relations between document sets and environments. In: L. EGGHE, R. ROUSSEAU (Eds), Informetrics 87/88. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 105-119.
20. LEYDESDORFF, L., S. E. COZZENS (1993), The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 26: 133-154.
21. LEYDESDORFF, L., P. V. D. BESSELAAR (1997), Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators. Scientometrics, 38: 155-174.
22. MOODY, J., D. R. WHITE (2003), Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68 (1): 103-127.
23. MRV AR, A., V. BAGATELJ (s.d.). Network Analysis Using Pajek; at http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/doc/pajekman.htm. Retrieved April 5, 2003.
24. NARIN, F., M. CARPENTER, N. C. BERLT (1972), Interrelationships of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23: 323-331.
25. OTTE, E., R. ROUSSEAU (2002), Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28 (6): 443-455.
26. PEARL, J. (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
27. PRICE, D. J. DE SOLLA (1965), Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149: 510-515.
28. SMALL, H., E. SWEENEY (1985), Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics, 7: 391-409.
29. TIJSSEN, R., J. DE LEEUW, A. F. J. VAN RAAN (1987), Quasi-correspondence analysis on square scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics, 11: 347-361.
30. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P. (2001), The cognitive and the social structure of science & technology studies. Scientometrics, 51: 441-460.
31. VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P., L. LEYDESDORFF (1996), Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47: 415-436.
32. WHITE, H. D. (2003), Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (13): 1250-1259.