The nature of interactions that contribute to postzygotic reproductive isolation in hybrid copepods

Genetica

Volumn 139, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 575-588

  Willett, Christopher S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dobzhansky Muller incompatibilities; Genomic coadaptation; Hybrid breakdown; Speciation; Tigriopus californicus

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHIMERA; COPEPOD; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALS; CHIMERA; COPEPODA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETIC VARIATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ZYGOTE;

COPEPODA; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

EID: 79955840228     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-010-9525-1     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Barbash DA, Roote J, Ashburner M (2000) The Drosophila melanogaster hybrid male rescue gene causes inviability in male and female species hybrids. Genetics 154: 1747-1771.
2. Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, Dangl JL, Weigel D (2007) Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol 5: 1962-1972.
3. Bordenstein SR, Drapeau MD (2001) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation. J Evol Biol 14: 490-501.
4. Brideau NJ, Flores HA, Wang J, Maheshwari S, Wang X, Barbash DA (2006) Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314: 1292-1295.
5. Burton RS (1987) Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41: 504-513.
6. Burton RS (1990a) Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 44: 1814-1822.
7. Burton RS (1990b) Hybrid breakdown in physiological response: a mechanistic approach. Evolution 44: 1806-1813.
8. Burton RS (1997) Genetic evidence for long term persistence of marine invertebrate populations in an ephemeral environment. Evolution 51: 993-998.
9. Burton RS (1998) Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52: 734-745.
10. Burton RS, Feldman MW, Curtsinger JW (1979) Population genetics of Tigriopus californicus Copepoda: Harpacticoida: I Population structure along the central California coast. Mar Ecol Prog Series 1: 29-39.
11. 2 hybrids: Consequences of rapid mitochondrial DNA evolution in allopatric populations. Am Nat 168: S14-S24.
12. Cabot EL, Davis AW, Johnson NA, Wu C-I (1994) Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: Complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics 136: 175-189.
13. Chou J-Y, Hung Y-S, Lin K-H, Lee H-Y, Leu J-Y (2010) Multiple molecular mechanisms cause reproductive isolation between three yeast species. PLoS Biol 8: e1000432.
14. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland.
15. Coyne JA, Simeonidis S, Rooney P (1998) Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D simulans. Genetics 150: 1091-1103.
16. Davis AW, Noonburg EG, Wu C-I (1994) Evidence for complex genic interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genetics 137: 191-199.
17. Demuth JP, Wade MJ (2007) Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. I. Genetic architecture. Evolution 61: 494-509.
18. Dethier MN (1980) Tidepools as refuges: predation and the limits of the Harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus californicus (Baker). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42: 99-111.
19. Dobzhansky T (1936) Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113-135.
20. Dybdahl MF (1994) Extinction, recolonization, and the genetic structure of tidepool copepod populations. Evol Ecol 8: 113-124.
21. Edmands S (1999) Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53: 1757-1768.
22. Edmands S (2001) Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol Ecol 10: 1743-1750.
23. Edmands S, Burton RS (1999) Cytochrome C oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: a test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution 53: 1972-1978.
24. Edmands S, Deimler JK (2004) Local adaptation, intrinsic coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 303: 183-196.
25. Edmands S, Harrision JS (2003) Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among populations of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 57: 2277-2285.
26. Edmands S, Freaman HV, Harrison JS, Timmerman CC (2005) Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations. J Heredity 96: 114-123.
27. Edmands S, Northrup SL, Hwang AS (2009) Maladapted gene complexes within populations of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californius. Evolution 63: 2184-2192.
28. Ellison CK, Burton RS (2006) Disruption of mitochondrial function in interpopulation hybrids of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 60: 1382-1391.
29. Ellison CK, Burton RS (2008a) Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 62: 631-638.
30. Ellison CK, Burton RS (2008b) Genotype-dependent variation of mitochondrial transcriptional profiles in interpopulation hybrids. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 15831-15836.
31. Ellison CK, Burton RS (2010) Cytonuclear conflict in interpopulation hybrids: the role of RNA polymerase in mtDNA transcription and replication. J Evol Biol 23: 528-538.
32. Ellison CK, Niehuis O, Gadau J (2008) Hybrid breakdown and mitochondrial dysfunction in hybrids of Nasonia parasitoid wasps. J Evol Biol 21: 1844-1851.
33. Fu YX, Li W-H (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
34. Fuller RC (2008) Genetic incompatibilities in killifish and the role of environment. Evolution 62: 3056-3068.
35. Ganz HH, Burton RS (1995) Genetic differentiation and reproductive incompatibility among Baja California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Marine Biol 123: 821-828.
36. Harrison JS, Burton RS (2006) Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 23: 559-564.
37. Harrison JS, Edmands S (2006) Chromosomal basis of viability differences in Tigriopus californicus interpopulation hybrids. J Evol Biol 19: 2040-2051.
38. Johnson NA (2010) Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield? Trends Genet 26: 317-325.
39. Kondrashov AS (2003) Accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities within a spatially structured population. Evolution 57: 151-153.
40. Lee H-Y, Chou J-Y, Cheong L, Chang N-H, Yang S-Y, Leu J-Y (2008) Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes caused hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135: 1065-1073.
41. Masly JP, Presgraves DC (2007) High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila. PLoS Biology 5: 1890-1898.
42. Monk CR (1941) Marine harpacticoid copepods from California. Trans Amer Microscop Soc 60: 75-99.
43. Moyle LC, Nakazato T (2009) Complex epistasis for Dobzhansky-Muller hybrid incompatibility in Solanum. Genetics 181: 347-351.
44. Muller HJ (1942) Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol Symp 6: 71-125.
45. 2 hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N vitripennis. Genetics 178: 413-426.
46. Noor MAF, Feder JL (2006) Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nat Rev Gen 7: 851-861.
47. Orr HA (1995) The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
48. Orr HA, Irving S (2001) Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 158: 1089-1100.
49. Palmer CA, Edmands S (2000) Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Marine Biol 136: 693-698.
50. Perez DE, Wu C-I (1995) Further characterization of the Odysseus locus of hybrid sterility in Drosophila: one gene is not enough. Genetics 140: 201-206.
51. Powlick JJ (1998) Seasonal abundance and population flux of Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in Barkley sound, British Columbia. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78: 467-481.
52. Presgraves DC (2003) A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: 955-972.
53. Presgraves DC (2010) The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nature Rev Genet 11: 175-180.
54. Rand DM, Haney RA, Fry AJ (2004) Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 645-653.
55. Rawson PD, Burton RS (2002) Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12955-12958.
56. Tang S, Presgraves DC (2009) Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 323: 779-782.
57. Tao Y, Chen S, Hartl DL, Laurie CC (2003) Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D mauritiana I differential accumulation of hybrid male sterility effects on the X and autosomes. Genetics 164: 1383-1397.
58. Turelli M, Moyle LC (2007) Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's Corollary to Haldane's rule. Genetics 176: 1059-1088.
59. Wade MJ, Johnson NA, Toquenaga Y (1999) Temperature effects and genotype-by-environment interactions in hybrids: Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Evolution 53: 855-865.
60. Welch JJ (2004) Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities: reconciling theory and data. Evolution 58: 1145-1156.
61. Willett CS (2006) Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Genetics 173: 1465-1477.
62. Willett CS (2008a) No evidence for faster male hybrid sterility in population crosses of an intertidal copepod (Tigriopus californicus). Genetica 133: 129-136.
63. Willett CS (2008b) Significant variation for fitness impacts of ETS loci in hybrids between populations of Tigriopus californicus. J Heredity 99: 56-65.
64. Willett CS (2010) Potential fitness tradeoffs for thermal tolerance in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 64: 2521-2534.
65. Willett CS, Berkowitz JN (2007) Viability effects and not meiotic drive cause dramatic departures from Mendelian inheritance for malic enzyme in hybrids of Tigriopus californicus populations. J Evol Biol 20: 1196-1205.
66. Willett CS, Burton RS (2001) Viability of cytochrome c depends on cytoplasmic background in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55: 1592-1599.
67. Willett CS, Burton RS (2003) Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57: 2286-2292.
68. Willett CS, Burton RS (2004) Evolution of interacting proteins in the mitochondrial electron transport system in a marine copepod. Mol Biol Evol 21: 443-453.
69. Willett CS, Ladner JT (2009) Investigations of fine-scale phylogeography in Tigriopus californicus reveal historical patterns of population divergence. BMC Evol 9: 139.
70. Willett CS. Deleterious interactions and reproductive isolation in the copepod Tigriopus californicus resulting from interchangeable components. Submitted to Heredity.