Viability effects and not meoitic drive cause dramatic departures from Mendelian inheritance for malic enzyme in hybrids of Tigriopus californicus populations

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1196-1205

  Willett, Christopher S ^a   Berkowitz, J N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene duplication; Genic incompatibilities; Hybrid breakdown; Post zygotic reproductive isolation; Selective sweep; Tigriopus californicus

Indexed keywords

MALATE DEHYDROGENASE;

CRUSTACEAN; ENZYME; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; INCOMPATIBILITY; POPULATION GENETICS; SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COPEPOD; DNA SEQUENCE; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; INHERITANCE; MEIOSIS; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; COPEPODA; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE; MEIOSIS; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

COPEPODA; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

EID: 34247515915     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01281.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Armbruster, P., Bradshaw, W.E. & Holzappel, C.M. 1997. Evolution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution 51: 451-458.
2. Barbash, D.A., Siino, D.F., Tarone, A.M. & Roote, J. 2003. A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100: 5302-5307.
3. Barbash, D.A., Awadalla, P. & Tarone, A.M. 2004. Functional divergence caused by ancient positive selection of a Drosophila hybrid incompatibility locus. PloS Biology 2: 839-848.
4. Burke, J.M., Voss, T.J. & Arnold, M.L. 1998. Genetic interactions and natural selection in Louisiana iris hybrids. Evolution 52: 1304-1310.
5. Burton, R.S. 1985. Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 86: 247-252.
6. Burton, R.S. 1986. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39: 526-535.
7. Burton, R.S. 1987. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41: 504-513.
8. Burton, R.S. 1990. Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 44: 1814-1822.
9. Burton, R.S. 1997. Genetic evidence for long term persistence of marine invertebrate populations in an ephemeral environment. Evolution 51: 993-998.
10. Burton, R.S. 1998. Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52: 734-745.
11. Burton, R.S. & Feldman, M.W. 1981. Population genetics of Tigriopus californicus. II. Differentiation among neighboring populations. Evolution 35: 1192-1205.
12. Burton, R.S. & Lee, B.-N. 1994. Nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies and allozyme polymorphism across a major phylogeographic break in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91: 5197-5201.
13. Burton, R.S., Feldman, M.W. & Curtsinger, J.W. 1979. Population genetics of Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). I. Population structure along the central California coast. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1: 29-39.
14. Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M.T. & Charlesworth, D. 1993. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics 141: 1619-1632.
15. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
16. Coyne, J.A., Simeonidis, S. & Rooney, P. 1998. Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 150 1091-1103.
17. Dobzhansky, Th. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113-135.
18. Dobzhansky, TH. 1950. Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 35: 288-302.
19. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53: 1757-1768.
20. Edmands, S. 2001. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1743-1750.
21. Edmands, S. & Deimler, J.K. 2004. Local adaptation, intrinsic coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 303: 183-196.
22. Fenster, C.B. & Galloway, L. F. 2000a. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conserv. Biol. 14: 1406-1412.
23. Fenster, C.B. & Galloway, L.F. 2000b. Population differentiation in an annual legume: genetic architecture. Evolution 54: 1157-1172.
24. Fishman, L. & Willis, J.H. 2005. A novel meiotic drive locus completely distorts segregation in Mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids. Genetics 169: 347-353.
25. Fishman, L., Kelly, A., Morgan, E. & Willis, J.H. 2001. A genetic map in the Mimulus guttatus species complex reveals transmission ratio distortion due to heterospecific interactions. Genetics 159: 1701-1716.
26. Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. 1993. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
27. Galloway, L.F. & Fenster, C.B. 1999. The role of nuclear and cytoplasmic factors in the adaptive evolution of populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Evolution 53: 1734-1743.
28. Ganz, H.H. & Burton, R.S. 1995. Genetic differentiation and reproductive incompatibility among Baja California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 123: 821-828.
29. Haldane, J.B.S. 1956. The estimation of viabilities. J. Genet. 59: 29-36.
30. Hall, M.C. & Willis, J.H. 2005. Transmission ratio distortion in intraspecific hybrids of Mimulus guttatus: implications for genomic divergence. Genetics 170: 375-386.
31. Hoelzel, A.R. & Green, A. 1992. Analysis of population-level variation by sequencing PCR-amplified DNA. In: Practical Approach Series: Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations (A. R. Hoelzel, ed.), pp. 159-187. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
32. Li, Z., Pinson, S.R.M., Paterson, A.H., Park, W.D. & Stansel, J.W. 1997. Genetics of hybrid sterility and hybrid breakdown in an intrasubspecific rice (Oryza sativa L.) population. Genetics 145: 1139-1148.
33. Maynard Smith, J. & Haigh, J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.
34. McDonald, J.H. & Kreitman, M. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
35. Merritt, T.J.S., Duvernell, D. & Eanes, W.F. 2005. Natural and synthetic alleles provide complementary insights into the nature of selection acting on the Men polymorphism of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 171: 1707-1718.
36. Moyle, L.C. & Graham, E.B. 2005. Genetics of hybrid incompatibility between Lycopersicon esulentum and L. hirsutum. Genetics 169: 355-373.
37. Muller, H.J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6: 71-125.
38. Orr, H.A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
39. Palmer, C.A. & Edmands, S. 2000. Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 136: 693-698.
40. Palopoli, M.F. & Wu, C.-I. 1994. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between Drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics 138: 329-341.
41. Presgraves, D.C. 2003. A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: 955-972.
42. Presgraves, D.C., Balagopalan, L., Abmayr, S.M. & Orr, H.A. 2003. Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
43. Rieseberg, L.H., Sinervo, B., Linder, C.R., Ungerer, M.C. & Arias, D.M. 1996. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272: 741-745.
44. Tajima, F. 1989. Statistical methods for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
45. Ting, C.-T., Tsaur, S.-C., Wu, M.-L. & Wu, C.-I. 1998. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282: 1501-1504.
46. Turelli, M. & Orr, H.A. 2000. Dominance, epistasis, and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663-1679.
47. Willett, C.S. & Burton, R.S. 2001. Viability of cytochrome c depends on cytoplasmic background in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55: 1592-1599.
48. Willett, C.S. & Burton, R.S. 2004. Evolution of interacting proteins in the mitochondrial electron transport system in a marine copepod. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 443-453.
49. Wright, F. 1990. The effective number of codons used in a gene. Gene 87: 23-29.