Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: Viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 2286-2292

  Willett, Christopher S ^a,b   Burton, Ronald S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Coadapted gene complexes; Cytochrome c oxidase; Environmental interactions; Epistasis; Hybrid breakdown; Intergenomic coadaptation; Reproductive incompatibility

Indexed keywords

EPISTASIS; HYBRIDIZATION; INCOMPATIBILITY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ANIMALIA; COPEPODA; INVERTEBRATA; TIGRIOPUS; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

EID: 0242499394     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00240.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1989. Adaptation, speciation, and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497-503.
2. Bordenstein, S. R., and M. D. Drapeau. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:490-501.
3. Burton, R. S. 1985. Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 86:247-252.
4. _. 1986. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39:526-535.
5. _. 1987. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41:504-513.
6. _. 1990. Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 44:1814-1822.
7. _. 1998. Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52:734-745.
8. Burton, R. S., and B.-N. Lee. 1994. Nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies and allozyme polymorphism across a major phylogeographic break in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5197-5201.
9. Burton, R. S., P. D. Rawson, and S. Edmands. 1999. Genetic architecture of physiological phenotypes: empirical evidence for coadapted gene complexes. Am. Zool. 39:451-462.
10. Campbell, D. R., and N. M. Waser. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55:669-676.
11. Dobzhansky, T. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113-135.
12. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53:1757-1768.
13. _. 2001. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10:1743-1750.
14. Edmands, S., and R. S. Burton. 1999. Cytochrome c oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: a test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution 53:1972-1978.
15. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Galloway, L. F., and C. B. Fenster. 1999. The role of nuclear and cytoplasmic factors in the adaptive evolution of populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Evolution 53:1734-1743.
17. Haldane, J. B. S. 1956. The estimation of viabilities. J. Genet. 59:29-36.
18. Harrison, R. G., and D. M. Rand. 1989. Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries. Pp. 111-133 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
19. Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1989. Principles of population genetics. 2d ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
20. Hoelzel, A. R., and A. Green. 1992. Analysis of population-level variation by sequencing PCR-amplified DNA. Pp. 159-187 in A. R. Hoelzel, ed. Practical approach series: molecular genetic analysis of populations. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
21. Maside, X. R., J. P. Barral, and H. F. Naveira. 1998. Hidden effects of X chromosome introgressions on spermatogenesis in Drosophila simulans X D. mauritiana hybrids unveiled by interactions among minor genetic factors. Genetics 150:745-754.
22. Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
23. Orr, H. A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-1813.
24. Rawson, P. D., and R. S. Burton. 2002. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12955-12958.
25. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr. 2000. Dominance, epistasis, and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
26. Wade, M. J., N. A. Johnson, and Y. Toquenaga. 1999. Temperature effects and genotype-by-environment interactions in hybrids: Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Evolution 53:855-865.
27. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton. 2001. Viability of cytochrome c depends on cytoplasmic background in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55:1592-1599.