Hybrid incompatibility genes: Remnants of a genomic battlefield?

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 317-325

  Johnson, Norman A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN;

CYTOPLASM; GENE CONTROL; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; MALE STERILITY; NONHUMAN; PLANT DEFENSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; YEAST;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; HUMANS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC;

EID: 77953913491     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates.
2. Bateson W. Heredity and variation in modern lights. Darwin and Modern Science 1909, 85-101. Cambridge University Press. A.C. Seward (Ed.).
3. Dobzhansky T. Genetics and the Origin of Species 1937, Columbia University Press.
4. Muller H.J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 1942, 6:71-125.
5. Orr H.A. Dobzhansky, Bateson, and the genetics of speciation. Genetics 1996, 144:1331-1335.
6. Johnson N.A. Sixty years after 'Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature': Muller's legacy. Genetics 2002, 161:939-944.
7. Johnson N.A. Direct selection for reproductive isolation: the Wallace effect and reinforcement. Natural Selection and Beyond: The Intellectual Legacy of Alfred Russel Wallace 2008, 114-124. Oxford University Press. C.H. Smith, G.W. Beccaloni (Eds.).
8. Burt A., Trivers R. Genes in Conflict 2006, Harvard University Press.
9. McDermontt S.R., Noor M.A.F. The role of meiotic drive in hybrid male sterility. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 2010, 365:1265-1272.
10. Presgraves D.C. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:175-180.
11. Budar F., et al. The nucleo-mitochondrial conflict in cytoplasmic male sterilities revisited. Genetica 2003, 117:3-16.
12. Rand D.S., et al. Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:645-653.
13. Birky C.W. The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2001, 35:125-148.
14. Hurst L.D., Pomiankowski A. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule related phenomena. Genetics 1991, 128:841-858.
15. Fishman L., Wills J.H. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 2006, 60:1372-1381.
16. Case A.L., Willis J.H. Hybrid male sterility in Mimulus is associated with a geographically restricted mitochondrial rearrangement. Evolution 2008, 62:1026-1039.
17. Barr C.M., Fishman L. The nuclear component of a cytonuclear hybrid incompatibility in Mimulus maps to a cluster of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) genes. Genetics 2010, 184:455-465.
18. Greig D. Reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces. Heredity 2009, 102:39-44.
19. Lee H.-Y., et al. Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 2008, 135:1065-1073.
20. Barbash D. Clash of the genomes. Cell 2008, 135:1002-1003.
21. Ellison C.K., Burton R.S. Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 2008, 62:631-638.
22. Willett C.S. Significant variation for fitness impacts in hybrids between populations of Tigriopus californicus. J. Hered. 2008, 99:56-65.
23. Harrison J.S., Burton R.S. Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:559-564.
24. Willet C.S., Burton R.S. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulational crosses. Evolution 2003, 57:2286-2292.
25. Ellison C.K., et al. Hybrid breakdown and mitochondrial dysfunction in hybrids of Nasonia parasitoid wasps. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:1844-1851.
26. Sackton T.B., et al. Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes. Evolution 2003, 57:2315-2325.
27. Bombilies K., Weigel D. Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:382-393.
28. Bombilies K., et al. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PloS Biol. 2007, 5:e236.
29. Bakker E.G., et al. A genome-wide survey of R gene polymorphisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1803-1818.
30. Ispolatov I., Doebeli M. Speciation due to hybrid necrosis in plant-pathogen models. Evolution 2009, 63:3076-3084.
31. Presgraves D.C., et al. Adaptive evolution drives the divergence of a hybrid incompatibility gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 2003, 423:715-719.
32. Tang S., Presgraves D.C. Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 2009, 323:779-782.
33. D'Angelo M.A., Hetzer M.W. Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:456-466.
34. De Souza C.P., Osmani S.A. Double duty for nuclear proteins - the price of more open forms of mitosis. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:545-554.
35. Zuccolo M., et al. The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J. 2007, 26:1853-1864.
36. Presgraves D.C., Stephen W. Pervasive adaptation evolution among interactors of the Drosophila hybrid inviability gene, Nup9. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:306-314.
37. Chan G.K., et al. Kinetochore structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:589-598.
38. Presgraves D.C. Does genetic conflict drive rapid molecular evolution of nuclear transport genes in Drosophila?. Bioessays 2007, 29:386-391.
39. Kusano A., et al. Closing the (Ran) Gap on segregation distorter in Drosophila. Bioessays 2003, 25:108-113.
40. Cronshaw J.M., Matunis M.J. The nuclear pore complex: disease associations and functional correlations. Trends Endcrinol. Metab. 2004, 15:34-39.
41. Grewal S.I.S., Jia S. Heterochromatin revisited. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:35-46.
42. Yasuhara J.C., Wakimoto B.T. Oxymoron no more: the expanding world of heterochromatic genes. Trends Genet. 2006, 22:330-338.
43. Henikoff S., et al. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 2001, 293:1098-1102.
44. Hughes S.E., Hawley R.S. Heterochromatin: a rapidly evolving species barrier. PloS Biol. 2009, 7:e10000233.
45. Sainz A., et al. Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans rescue strains produce fit offspring, despite divergent centromere-specific histone alleles. Heredity 2003, 91:28-35.
46. Fishman L., Willis J.H. A novel meiotic drive locus almost completely distorts segregation in Mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids. Genetics 2005, 169:347-353.
47. Perez D.E., et al. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: DNA-marker assisted mapping and characterization of a hybrid sterility gene, Odysseus (Ods). Genetics 1993, 134:261-275.
48. Ting C.-T., et al. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 1998, 282:1501-1504.
49. Ortíz-Barrientos D., et al. Gene expression divergence and the origin of hybrid dysfunctions. Genetica 2007, 129:71-81.
50. Bayes J.J., Malik H.S. Altered heterochromatin binding in a hybrid sterility protein in Drosophila sibling species. Science 2009, 326:1538-1541.
51. Mihola O., et al. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 transferase. Science 2009, 323:373-375.
52. Oliver P.L., et al. Accelerated evolution of the Prdm9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa. PloS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000753.
53. Baudat F., et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 2010, 327:836-840.
54. Myers S., et al. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 2010, 327:876-879.
55. Parvanov E.D., et al. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 2010, 327:835.
56. Arnheim N., et al. Mammalian meiotic recombination hot spots. Ann. Rev. Gent. 2007, 41:369-399.
57. Friberg U., Rice W.R. Cut thy neighbor: cyclic birth and death of recombination hotspots via genetic conflict. Genetics 2008, 179f:2229-2238.
58. Hutter P., et al. A genetic basis for the inviability of hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. Genetics 1990, 124:909-920.
59. Brideau N.J., et al. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 2006, 314:1292-1295.
60. Barbash D.A., et al. A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:5302-5307.
61. Sawamura K., et al. Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster. Genetics 1993, 133:307-313.
62. Ferree P.M., Barbash D.A. Species-specific heterochromatin prevents mitotic chromosome segregation to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. PloS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000234.
63. Cattani M.V., Presgraves D.C. Genetics and lineage-specific evolution of a lethal hybrid incompatibility between Drosophila mauritiana and its sibling species. Genetics 2009, 181:1545-1555.
64. Dover G.A. Molecular drive: a cohesive model of species evolution. Nature 1982, 299:111-117.
65. Tao Y., et al. Sex-ratio segregation distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:13183-13188.
66. Phadnis N., Orr H.A. A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science 2009, 323:376-379.
67. Schartl M. Evolution of Xmrk: an oncogene, but also a speciation gene?. Bioessays 2008, 30:822-832.
68. Fernandez A.A., Morris M.R. Mate choice for more melanin as a mechanism to maintain a functional oncogene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:13503-13507.
69. Wittbrodt J., et al. Novel putative receptor tyrosine kinase produced by the melanona-inducing Tu locus in Xiphophorus. Nature 1989, 341:415-421.
70. Presgraves D.C. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:336-343.
71. Meiklejohn C.D., Tao Y. Genetic conflict and sex chromosome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:215-223.
72. Dean A.M., Thornton J.W. Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:675-688.
73. Emerman M., Malik H.S. Paleovirology - modern consequences of ancient viruses. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000301.
74. Cabot E.L., et al. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid sterility. Genetics 1994, 137:175-189.
75. Orr H.A., Irving S. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 2001, 158:1089-1100.
76. Orr H.A. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 1995, 139:1805-1813.
77. Kirkpatrick M., Barton N.H. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 2007, 173:419-434.
78. Masly J.P., et al. Gene transposition as a cause of hybrid sterility. Science 2006, 313:1448-1450.
79. Lynch M., Force A.G. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:590-605.
80. Frank S.A. Divergence in meiotic drive-suppressors as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 1991, 45:262-267.
81. Chen J., et al. A triallelic system of S5 is a major regulator of the reproductive barrier and compatibility of indica-japonica hybrids in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:11436-11441.
82. Long Y., et al. Hybrid male sterility in rice controlled by interaction between divergent alleles of two adjacent genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:18871-18876.
83. Walther T.C., et al. RanGTP mediates nuclear pore complex assembly. Nature 2003, 424:689-694.
84. Johnson N.A., Porter A.H. Evolution of branched regulatory genetic pathways: directional selection on pleiotropic loci accelerates developmental system drift. Genetica 2007, 129:57-70.
85. True J.R., Haag E.S. Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Develop. 2001, 3:109-119.