Chromosomal basis of viability differences in Tigriopus californicus interpopulation hybrids

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2040-2051

  Harrison, J S ^a   Edmands, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance; Epistasis; Hybrid; Tigriopus californicus; Viability

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; CRUSTACEAN; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; HYBRID; INTERPOPULATION VARIATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; COPEPOD; CROSS BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; COPEPODA; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE;

TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

EID: 33746415751     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01145.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ar-Rushdi, A.H. 1963. The cytology of achiasmatic meiosis in the female Tigriopus (Copepoda). Chromosoma 13: 1754-1763.
2. Birchler, J.A., Auger, D.L. & Riddle, N.C. 2003. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell 15: 2236-2239.
3. Bull, J.J. 1983. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., London.
4. Burton, R.S. 1985. Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 86: 247-252.
5. Burton, R.S. 1986. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow among natural populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39: 526-535.
6. Burton, R.S. 1987. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41: 504-513.
7. Burton, R.S. 1990. Hybrid breakdown in physiological response a mechanistic approach. Evolution 44: 1806-1813.
8. Burton, R.S. 1998. Intraspecific phylogeography across the point conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52: 734-745.
9. Burton, R.S. & Lee, B.-N. 1994. Nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies and allozyme polymorphism across a major phylogeographic break in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 5197-5201.
10. Burton, R.S., Feldman, M.W. & Swisher, S.G. 1981. Linkage relationships among five enzyme-coding gene loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus: a genetic confirmation of achiasmatic meiosis. Biochem. Gen. 19: 1237-1245.
11. Burton, R.S., Rawson, P.D. & Edmands, S. 1999. Genetic architecture of physiological phenotypes: empirical evidence for coadapted gene complexes. Am. Zool. 39: 451-462.
12. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 1997. 'Patterns of speciation in Drosophila' revisited. Evolution 51: 295-303.
13. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
14. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53: 1757-1765.
15. Edmands, S. 2001. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1743-1750.
16. Edmands, S. & Burton, R.S. 1999. Cytochrome C oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: a test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution 53: 1972-1978.
17. Edmands, S. & Harrison, J.S. 2003. Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among populations of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 57: 2277-2285.
18. Eanes, W.F., Hey, J. & Houle, D. 1985. Homozygous and hemizygous viability variation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 111: 831-844.
19. Edmands, S., Feaman, H.V., Harrison, J.S. & Timmerman, C.C. 2005. Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations. J. Hered. 96: 114-123.
20. Egloff, D.A. 1967. Ecological Aspects of Sex Ratio and Reproduction in Experimental and Field Populations of the Marine Copepod Tigriopus californicus. PhD Dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
21. Ganz, H.H. & Burton, R.S. 1995. Genetic differentiation and reproductive incompatibility among Baja-California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 123: 821-827.
22. Haldane, J.B.S. 1956. The estimation of viabilities. J. Genet. 59: 29-36.
23. Harrison, J.S., Peterson, D.L., Swain, J.R. & Edmands, S. 2004. Microsatellite DNA markers for the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 736-738.
24. Hedrick, P.W. 2000. Genetics of Populations, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA.
25. Jiang, C.-X., Chee, P.W., Draye, X., Morrell, P.L., Smith, C.W. & Paterson, A.H. 2000. Multilocus interactions restrict gene introgression in interspecific populations of polyploid Gossypium (cotton). Evolution 54: 798-814.
26. Lazzaretto, I. & Libertini, A. 1986. Karyological comparisons among different populations of the genus Tigriopus (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Boll. Di. Zool. 53: 197-201.
27. Muller, H.J. 1940. Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. In: The New Systematics (J. Huxley, ed.), pp. 185-268. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. Myburg, A.A., Vogl, C., Griffin, A.R., Sederoff, R.R. & Whetten, R. 2004. Genetics of postzygotic isolation in eucalyptus: whole-genome analysis of barriers to introgression in a wide interspecific cross of Eucalyptus grandis and E. globules. Genetics 166: 1405-1418.
29. Orr, H.A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation - the evolution of hybrid incompatabilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
30. Orr, H.A. 1996. Dobzhansky, Bateson, and the genetics of speciation. Genetics 144: 1331-1335.
31. Palmer, C.A. & Edmands, S. 2000. Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 136: 693-698.
32. Phillips, P.C. & Johnson, N.A. 1998. The population genetics of synthetic lethals. Genetics 150: 449-458.
33. Presgraves, D.C. 2003. A fine scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: 955-972.
34. Rieseberg, L.H., Sinervo, B., Linder, C.R., Ungerer, M.C. & Arias, D.M. 1996. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272: 741-745.
35. Rieseberg, L.H., Baird, S.J. & Gardner, K.A. 2000. Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 205-224.
36. Saccheri, I.J., Lloyd, H.D., Helyar, S.J. & Brakefield, P.M. 2005. Inbreeding uncovers fundamental differences in the genetic load affecting male and female fertility in a butterfly. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 272: 39-46.
37. Slotman, M., della Torre, A. & Powell, J.R. 2004. The genetics of inviability and male sterility in hybrids between Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis. Genetics 167: 275-287.
38. Turelli, M., Barton, N.H. & Coyne, J.A. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330-342.
39. Vittor, B.A. 1971. Effects of the Environment on Fitness-Related Life History Characters in Tigriopus californicus. PhD Dissertation. University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
40. Voorduow, M.J. & Anholt, B.R. 2002a. Heritability of sex tendency in a harpacticoid copepod, Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 56: 1754-1763.
41. Voorduow, M.J. & Anholt, B.R. 2002b. Environmental sex determination in a splash pool copepod. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76: 511-520.
42. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M. & Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
43. Whitlock, M.C., Ingvarsson, P.K. & Hatfield, T. 1999. Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity 84: 452-457.
44. Wilding, C.S., Butlin, R.K. & Grahame, J. 2001. Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 611-619.
45. Willett, C.S. & Burton, R.S. 2001. Viability of cytochrome c genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55: 1592-1599.
46. Willett, C.S. & Burton, R.S. 2003. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: Viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57: 2286-2292.
47. Xu, M., Li, X. & Korban, S.S. 2000. AFLP-based detection of DNA methylation. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 18: 361-368.