Cytochrome c oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: A test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1972-1978

  Edmands, Suzanne ^a,b   Burton, Ronald S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coadaptation; Copepod; Cytochrome c oxidase; Enzyme activity; Introgression; Nuclear cytoplasmic interactions; Tigriopus californicus

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SUBUNIT; GENOME; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ADAPTATION; CRUSTACEAN; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENETICS; HYBRID;

COPEPODA; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

EID: 0033428028     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04578.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ar-rushdi, A. H. 1963. The cytology of achiasmatic meiosis in the female Tigriopus (Copepoda). Chromosoma 13:526.
2. Attardi, G., and G. Schatz. 1988. Biogenesis of mitochondria. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 4:289-333.
3. Avise, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. Breeuwer, J. A., and J. H. Werren. 1995. Hybrid breakdown between two haplodiploid species: the role of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes. Evolution 49:705-717.
5. Burton, R. S. 1985. Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 86:247-252.
6. _. 1986. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow among natural populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39:526-535.
7. _. 1987. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41:504-513.
8. _. 1990a. Hybrid breakdown in physiological response: a mechanistic approach. Evolution 44:1806-1813.
9. _. 1990b. Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 44:1814-1822.
10. _. 1997. Genetic evidence for persistence of marine invertebrate populations in an ephemeral environment. Evolution 51: 993-998.
11. _. 1998. Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52:734-745.
12. Burton, R. S., and M. W. Feldman. 1981. Population genetics of Tigriopus californicus. II. Differentiation among neighboring populations. Evolution 35:1192-1205.
13. Burton, R. S., and B.-N. Lee. 1994. Nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies and allozyme polymorphism across a major phylogeographic break in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91:5197-5201.
14. Burton, R. S., M. W. Feldman, and S. G. Swisher. 1981. Linkage relationships among five enzyme-coding gene loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus: a genetic confirmation of achiasmatic meiosis. Biochem. Genet. 19:1237-1245.
15. Burton, R. S., P. D. Rawson, and S. Edmands. 1999. Genetic architecture of physiological phenotypes: empirical evidence for coadapted gene complexes. Am. Zool. 39:451-462.
16. Cann, R. L., W. M. Brown, and A. C. Wilson. 1984. Polymorphic sites and the mechanism of evolution in human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 106:479-499.
17. Capaldi, R. A. 1990. Structure and function of cytochrome c oxidase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:569-596.
18. _. 1996. The complexity of a respiratory complex. Nature Struct. Biol. 3:570-574.
19. Charlesworth, D. 1995. Hybrid speciation - evolution under the microscope. Curr. Biol. 5:835-836.
20. Clark, A. G., and E. M. S. Lyckegaard. 1988. Natural selection with nuclear and cytoplasmic transmission. III. Joint analysis of segregation and mtDNA in Drosophila melenogaster. Genetics 118:471-482.
21. Clark, A. G., and L. Wang. 1994. Comparative evolutionary analysis of metabolism in nine Drosophila species. Evolution 48: 1230-1243.
22. Edmands, S., and R. S. Burton. 1998. Variation in cytochrome-c oxidase activity is not maternally inherited in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Heredity 80:668-674.
23. Grun, P. 1976. Cytoplasmic genetics and evolution. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
24. Kilpatrick, S. T., and D. M. Rand. 1995. Conditional hitchhiking of mitochondrial DNA: frequency shifts of Drosophila melanogaster mtDNA variants depend on nuclear genetic background. Genetics 141:1113-1124.
25. King, M. P., and G. Attardi. 1989. Human cells lacking mtDNA: repopulation of exogenous mitochondria by complementation. Science 246:500-503.
26. Lee, B.-N. 1993. Genetic structure of Tigriopus californicus populations inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I DNA sequences. Ph.D. diss., University of Houston. Houston, TX.
27. Liepens, A., and S. Hennen. 1977. Cytochrome oxidase deficiency during development of amphibian nucleocytoplasmic hybrids. Dev. Biol. 57:284-292.
28. Osheroff, N., S. H. Speck, E. Margoliash, E. C. L. Veerman, J. Wilms, B. W. Konig, and A. O. Muijsers. 1983. The reaction of primate cytochromes c with cytochrome c oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 258:5731-5745.
29. Pel, H. J., A. Tzagoloff, and L. A. Grivell. 1992. The identification of 18 nuclear genes required for the expression of the yeast mitochondrial gene encoding cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1. Curr. Genet. 21:139-146.
30. Rand, D. M., M. Dorfsman, and L. M. Kann. 1994. Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 138:741-756.
31. Rieseberg, L. H. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:359-389.
32. Simon, L. M., and E. D. Robin. 1971. Relationship of cytochrome oxidase activity to vertebrate total and organ oxygen consumption. Int. J. Biochem. 2:569-573.
33. Smith, P. K., R. I. Krohn, G. T. Hermanson, A. K. Mallia, F. H. Gartner, M. D. Provenzano, E. K. Fujimoto, N. M. Goeke, B. J. Olson, and D. C. Klenck. 1985. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Analyt. Biochem. 150:76-85.
34. Tsukihara, T., H. Aoyama, E. Yamashita, T. Tomizaki, H. Yamaguchi, K. Shinzawa-Itoh, R. Nakashima, R. Yaono, and S. Yoshikawa. 1996. The whole structure of the 13-subunit oxidized cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8 Å. Science 272:1136-1144.