Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 559-564

  Harrison, J Scott ^a   Burton, Ronald S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytochrome c; Cytochrome c oxidase; Epistasis; Hybridization; Nuclear mitochondrial coadaptation; Tigriopus californicus

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; COPEPOD; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HYBRID; NONHUMAN; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; COPEPODA; CYTOCHROMES C; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED;

COPEPODA; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

EID: 33244470012     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj058     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blier, P. U., F. Dufresne, and R. S. Burton. 2001. Natural selection and the evolution of mtDNA-encoded peptides: evidence for intergenomic co-adaptation. Trends Genet. 17:400-406.
2. Burton, R. S. 1986. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow among natural populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39:526-535.
3. _. 1990. Hybrid breakdown in physiological response: a mechanistic approach. Evolution 44:1806-1813.
4. _. 1998. Intraspecific phylogeography across the point conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52:734-745.
5. Burton, R. S., and B.-N. Lee. 1994. Nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies and allozyme polymorphism across a major phylogeographic break in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5197-5201.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
7. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
8. Drosou, V., F. Malatesta, and B. Ludwig. 2002. Mutations in the docking site for cytochrome c on the Paracoccus heme aa3 oxidase. Electron entry and kinetic phases of the reaction. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:2980-2988.
9. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53:1757-1765.
10. _. 2001. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10:1743-1750.
11. Edmands, S., and R. S. Burton. 1999. Cytochrome c oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: a test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution 53:1972-1978.
12. Edmands, S., and J. S. Harrison. 2003. Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among populations of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 57:2277-2285.
13. Jobson, R. W., R. Nielson, L. Laakkonen, M. Wikstrom, and V. A. Albert. 2004. Adaptive evolution of cytochrome c oxidase: infrastructure for a carnivorous plant radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:18064-18068.
14. Maneg, M., F. Malatesta, B. Ludwig, and V. Drosou. 2004. Interaction of cytochrome c with cytochrome c oxidase: two different docking scenarios. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1655:274-281.
15. Muller, H. J. 1940. Bearing of the "Drosophila" work in systematics. Pp. 185-268 in J. Huxley, ed. The new systematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Orr, H. A., J. P. Masly, and D. C. Presgraves. 2004. Speciation genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14:675-679.
17. Osheroff, N., S. H. Speck, E. Margoliash, E. C. Veerman, J. Wilms, B. W. Konig, and A. O. Muijsers. 1983. The reaction of primate cytochromes c with cytochrome c oxidase: analysis of the polarographic assay. J. Biol. Chem. 258:5731-5738.
18. Pollock, W. B. R., F. I. Rosell, M. B. Twitchett, M. E. Dumont, and A. G. Mauk. 1998. Bacterial expression of a mitochondrial cytochrome c. Trimethylation of Lys72 in yeast iso-1-cytochrome c and the alkaline conformational transition. Biochemistry 37:6124-6131.
19. Presgraves, D. C. 2003. A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163:955-972.
20. Rawson, P. D., and R. S. Burton. 2002. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12955-12958.
21. Rawson, P. D., D. A. Brazeau, and R. S. Burton. 2000. Isolation and characterization of cytochrome c from the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. Gene 248:15-22.
22. Roberts, V. A., and M. E. Pique. 1999. Definition of the interaction domain for cytochrome c on cytochrome c oxidase. III. Prediction of the docked complex by a complete, systematic search. J. Biol. Chem. 274:38051-38060.
23. Sackton, T. B., R. A. Haney, and D. M. Rand. 2003. Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes. Evolution 57:2315-2325.
24. Schmidt, T. R., D. E. Wildman, M. Uddin, J. C. Opazo, M. Goodman, and L. I. Grossman. 2005. Rapid electrostatic evolution at the binding site for cytochrome c on cytochrome c oxidase in anthropoid primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6379-6384.
25. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:330-342.
26. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton. 2001. Viability of cytochrome c genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55:1592-1599.
27. _. 2003. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57:2286-2292.
28. Wu, C-I., and C.-T. Ting. 2004. Genes and speciation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5:114-127.
29. Zhen, Y., C. W. Hoganson, G. T. Babcock, and S. Ferguson-Miller. 1999. Definition of the interaction domain for cytochrome c on cytochrome c oxidase. I. Biochemical, spectral, and kinetic characterization of surface mutants in subunit II of Rhodobacter sphaeroides cytochrome aa3. J. Biol. Chem. 274:38032-38041.