Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule

Genetics

Volumn 176, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 1059-1088

  Turelli, Michael ^a   Moyle, Leonie C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CYTOPLASM; GAMETOPHYTE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; HYBRID; MATING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHROMOSOME; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; SPOROPHYTE; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CROSSES, GENETIC; CYTOPLASM; FERTILIZATION; INFERTILITY; MODELS, GENETIC; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; POLLEN; RNA, MESSENGER;

EID: 34250709583     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.065979     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. ARNOLD, S. J., P. A. VERRELL and S. G. TILLEY, 1996 The evolution of asymmetry in sexual isolation: a model and test case. Evolution 50: 1024-1033.
2. BARBASH, D. A., D. F. SIINO, A. M. TARONEAND J. ROOTE, 2003 A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolating in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5302-5307.
3. BATESON, W., 1901 Experiments in plant hybridization. J. R. Hortic. Soc. 26: 1-32.
4. BERLIN, S., and H. ELLEGREN, 2006 Fast accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations on the female-specific W chromosome in birds. J. Mol. Evol. 62: 66-72.
5. BERNACCHI, D., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1997 An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147: 861-877.
6. BOLNICK, D. I., and T. J. NEAR, 2005 Tempo of hybrid inviability in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Evolution 59: 1754-1767.
7. BRIDEAU, N. J., H. A. FLORES, J. WANG, S. MAHESHWARI, X. WU et al., 2006 Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314: 1292-1295.
8. BRIDGEN, M. P., 1994 A review of plant embryo culture. Hortscience 29: 1243-1246.
9. BURT, A., and R. TRIVERS, 2006 Genes in Conflict. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
10. BUSHELL, C., M. SPIELMAN and R. J. SCOTT, 2003 The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. Plant Cell 15: 1430-1442.
11. CAMADRO, E. L., and R. W. MASUELLI, 1995 A genetic model for the endosperm balance number (EBN) in the wild potato Solanum Acaule Bitt and 2 related diploid species. Sex. Plant Reprod. 8: 283-288.
12. CHARLESWORTH, B., J. A. COYNE and N. H. BARTON, 1987 The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130: 113-146.
13. CHARLESWORTH, B., H. BORTHWICK, C. BARTOLOMÉ and P. PIGNATELLI, 2004 Estimates of the genome mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 815-826.
14. CHO, Y., J. P. MOWER, Y. L. QIU and J. D. PALMER, 2004 Mitochondrial substitution rates are extraordinarily elevated and variable in a genus of flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 17741-17746.
15. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 1989a Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
16. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 1989b Two rules of speciation, pp. 180-207 in Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by D. OTTE and J. A. ENDLER. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
17. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 1997 "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51: 295-303.
18. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 2004 Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
19. COYNE, J. A., S. SIMEONIDIS and P. ROONEY, 1998 Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 150: 1091-1103.
20. CRESTI, M., and A. TIEZZI, 1997 Sexual Plant Reproduction. Springer, Berlin.
21. DARWIN, C., 1859 On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.
22. DAWE, R. K., and S. HENIKOFF, 2006 Centromeres put epigenetics in the driver's seat. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31: 662-669.
23. DE NETTANCOURT, D., 2001 Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer, Berlin.
24. DETTMAN, J. R., D. J. JACOBSON, E. TURNER, A. PRINGLE and J. W. TAYLOR, 2003 Reproductive isolation and phylogenetic divergence in Neurospora: comparing methods of species recognition in a model eukaryote. Evolution 57: 2721-2741.
25. DOBZHANSKY, T., 1936 Studies on hybrid sterility II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113-135.
26. DOBZHANSKY, T., 1937 Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
27. EHLENFELDT, M. K., and R. E. HANNEMAN, 1988 Genetic control of endosperm balance number (EBN) - 3 additive loci in a threshold-like system. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 825-832.
28. FRANK, S. A., 1989 The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Am. Nat. 133: 345-376.
29. FROVA, C., and M. E. PE, 1997 Gene expression during pollen development, pp. 31-48 in Sexual Plant Reproduction, edited by M. CRESTI and A. TIEZZI. Springer, Berlin.
30. GALLANT, S. L., and D. J. FAIRBAIRN, 1997 Patterns of postmating reproductive isolation in a newly discovered species pair, Aquarius remigis and A. remigoides (Hemiptera; Gerridae). Heredity 78: 571-577.
31. GERSTEL, D. U., 1954 A new lethal combination in interspecific cotton hybrids. Genetics 39: 628-639.
32. GRUN, P., 1976 Cytoplasmic Genes and Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.
33. GUTIERREZ-MARCOS, J. F., P. D. PENNINGTON, L. M. COSTA and H. G. DICKINSON, 2003 Imprinting in the endosperm: a possible role in preventing wide hybridization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 1105-1111.
34. HALDANE, J. B. S., 1922 Sex-ratio and unidirectional sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12: 101-109.
35. HARRISON, J. S., and R. S. BURTON, 2006 Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 559-564.
36. HARRISON, R. G., 1983 Barriers to gene exchange between closely related cricket species. I. Laboratory hybridization studies. Evolution 37: 245-251.
37. HOLLINGSHEAD, L., 1930 A lethal factor in Crepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid. Genetics 15: 114-140.
38. HOULE, D., 1998 How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 103: 241-253.
39. JOHNSTON, S. A., and R. E. HANNEMAN, 1999 The nature of the genetic control of endosperm balance number based on aneuploid analysis of Datura. Sex. Plant Reprod. 12: 71-75.
40. KANESHIRO, K. Y., 1980 Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34: 437-444.
41. KATSIOTIS, A., R. E. HANNEMANAND R. A. FORSBERG, 1995 Endosperm balance number and the polar-nuclear activation hypothesis for endosperm development in interspecific crosses of Solanaceae and Gramineae respectively. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 848-855.
42. KAWANISHI, M., and T. K. WATANABE, 1981 Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Evolution 35: 1128-1133.
43. KONDRASHOV, A. S., 2003 Accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities within a spatially structured population. Evolution 57: 151-153.
44. LEVIN, D. A., 2003 The cytoplasmic factor in plant speciation. Syst. Bot. 28: 5-11.
45. LEWIS, D., and L. K. CROWE, 1958 Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233-256.
46. LIJTMAER, D. A., B. MAHLER and P. L. TUBARO, 2003 Hybridization and postzygotic isolation patterns in pigeons and doves. Evolution 57: 1411-1418.
47. LIN, B. Y., 1984 Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics 107: 103-115.
48. LINKE, B., and T. BORNER, 2005 Mitochondrial effects on flower and pollen development. Mitochondrion 5: 389-402.
49. MACNAIR, M. R., and P. CHRISTIE, 1983 Reproductive isolation as a pleiotropic effect of copper tolerance in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 50: 295-302.
50. MASCARENHAS, J. P., 1989 The male gametophyte of flowering plants. Plant Cell 1: 657-664.
51. MATSUBARA, K., T. KHIN and Y. SANO, 2003 A gene block causing cross-incompatibility hidden in wild and cultivated rice. Genetics 165: 343-352.
52. MAYR, E., 1986 Joseph Gottlieb Kölreuter's contributions to biology. Osiris 2: 135-176.
53. MENDELSON, T. C., B. D. INOUYE and M. D. RAUSHER, 2004 Quantifying patterns in the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58: 1424-1433.
54. MOYLE, L. C., and E. B. GRAHAM, 2005 Genetics of hybrid incompatibility between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. hirsutum. Genetics 169: 355-373.
55. MOYLE, L. C., M. S. OLSON and P. TIFFIN, 2004 Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58: 1195-1208.
56. MULLER, H. J., 1940 Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics, pp. 185-268 in The New Systematics, edited by J. HUXLEY. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
57. MULLER, H. J., 1942 Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6: 71-125.
58. NAVAJAS, M., A. TSAGKARAKOV, J. LAGNEL and M. J. PERROT-MINNOT, 2000 Genetic differentiation in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Polymorphism, host races or sibling species? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24: 365-376.
59. OLBY, R. C., 1966a Origins of Mendelism. Schocken Books, New York.
60. OLBY, R. C., 1966b Joseph Koelreuter, 1733-1806, pp. 33-65 in Late Eighteenth Century European Scientists, edited by R. C. OLBY. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
61. OLIVER, C. G., 1978 Experimental hybridization between the nymphalid butterflies Phyciodes tharos and P. campestris montana. Evolution 32: 594-601.
62. ORR, H. A., 1989 Localization of genes causing postzygotic isolation in two hybridizations involving Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity 63: 231-237.
63. ORR, H. A., 1993 A mathematical model of Haldane's rule. Evolution 47: 1606-1611.
64. ORR, H. A., 1995 The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
65. ORR, H. A., and L. H. ORR, 1996 Waiting for speciation: the effect of population subdivision on the time to speciation. Evolution 50: 1742-1749.
66. ORR, H. A., and M. TURELLI, 2001 The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1085-1094.
67. OTTAVIANO, E., and D. L. MULCAHY, 1989 Genetics of angiosperm pollen. Adv. Genet. 26: 1-64.
68. PARKER, H. R., D. P. PHILIPP and G. S. WHITT, 1985 Gene regulatory divergence among species estimated by altered developmental patterns in interspecific hybrids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 56: 217-250.
69. PRESGRAVES, D. C., 2002 Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56: 1168-1183.
70. PRESGRAVES, D. C., 2003 A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: 955-972.
71. PRESGRAVES, D. C., and H. A. ORR, 1998 Haldane's rule in taxa lacking hemizygous X. Science 282: 952-954.
72. PRESGRAVES, D. C., L. BALAGOPALAN, S. M. ABMAYR and H. A. ORR, 2003 Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
73. RAKOCINSKI, C. F., 1984 Aspects of reproductive isolation between Campostoma oligolepis and Campostoma anomalum pullum (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in northern Illinois. Am. Midl. Nat. 112: 138-145.
74. RAND, D. M., A. G. CLARK and L. M. KANN, 2001 Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 159: 173-187.
75. RAND, D. M., R. A. HANEY and A. J. FRY, 2004 Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 645-653.
76. RAPP, R. A., and J. F. WENDEL, 2005 Epigenetics and plant evolution. New Phytol. 168: 81-91.
77. RASHID, A., and P. A. PETERSON, 1992 The Rss system of unidirectional cross-incompatibility in maize. 1. Genetics. J. Hered. 83: 130-134.
78. ROBERTS, H. F., 1929 Plant Hybridization Before Mendel. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
79. SACKTON, T. B., R. A. HANEY and D. M. RAND, 2003 Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes. Evolution 57: 2315-2325.
80. SALAZAR, C. A., C. D. JIGGINS, C. F. ARIAS, A. TOBLER, E. BERMINGHAN et al., 2005 Hybrid incompatibility is consistent with a hybrid origin of Heliconius heurippa Hewiston from its close relatives, Heliconius cydno Doubleday and Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 247-256.
81. SANDSTEDT, S. A., and P. K. TUCKER, 2005 Male-driven evolution in closely related species of the mouse genus Mus. J. Mol. Evol. 61: 138-144.
82. SAWAMURA, K., 1996 Maternal effect as a cause of exceptions for Haldane's rule. Genetics 143: 609-611.
83. SCHNABLE, P. S., and R. P. WISE, 1998 The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 175-180.
84. SWEIGART, A. L., L. FISHMAN and J. H. WILLIS, 2006 A simple genetic incompatibility causes hybrid male sterility in Mimulus. Genetics 172: 2465-2479.
85. SZAFRANIEC, K., D. M. WLOCH, P. SLIWA, R. BORTS and R. KORONA, 2003 Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet. Res. 82: 19-31.
86. TADROS, W., and H. D. LIPSHITZ, 2005 Setting the stage for development: mRNA translation and stability during oocyte maturation and egg activation in Drosophila. Dev. Dyn. 232: 593-608.
87. TAO, Y., and D. L. HARTL, 2003 Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57: 2580-2598.
88. THORNTON, W. A., 1955 Interspecific hybridization in Bufo woodhousei and Bufo valliceps. Evolution 9: 455-468.
89. TIFFIN, P., M. S. OLSON and L. C. MOYLE, 2001 Asymmetric crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 268: 861-867.
90. TURELLI, M., and D. J. BEGUN, 1997 Haldane's rule and X chromosome size in Drosophila. Genetics 147: 1799-1815.
91. TURELLI, M., and H. A. ORR, 1995 The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140: 389-402.
92. TURELLI, M., and H. A. ORR, 2000 Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663-1679.
93. VRANA, P. B., J. A. FOSSELLA, P. MATTESON, T. DEL RIO, M. J. O'NEILL et al., 2000 Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus. Nat. Genet. 25: 120-124.
94. WAGSTAFF, B. J., and D. J. BEGUN, 2005 Molecular population genetics of accessory gland protein genes and testis-expressed genes in Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae. Genetics 171: 1083-1101.
95. WANG, H., and S. K. DEY, 2006 Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 185-199.
96. WELCH, J. J., 2004 Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities: reconciling theory and data. Evolution 58: 1145-1156.
97. WHITTLE, C. A., and M. O. JOHNSTON, 2002 Male-driven evolution of mitochondrial and chloroplastidial DNA sequences in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 938-949.
98. WILLEMSE, M., and A. VAN LAMMEREN, 2002 Fertilization, from attraction to embryo. Biologia 57: 13-22.
99. WILLETT, C. S., and R. S. BURTON, 2001 Viability of cytochrome C genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55: 1592-1599.
100. WOLFE, K. H., W. H. LI and P. M. SHARP, 1987 Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 9054-9058.
101. WOLFRAM, S., 2003 The Mathematica Book, Ed. 5. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL.
102. WU, C.-I, and A. W. DAVIS, 1993 Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142: 187-212.