Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: No evidence for a binocular specialism

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1246-1257

  Keefe, Bruce D ^a   Hibbard, Paul B ^b   Watt, Simon J ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Cue integration; Grasping; Perceptual uncertainty; Visuo motor control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGNOSIA; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION, BINOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79954426067     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.047     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Akerstrom R.A., Todd J.T. The perception of stereoscopic transparency. Perception and Psychophysics 1988, 44:421-432.
2. Alais D., Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 2004, 14:257-262.
3. Anderson J., Bingham G.P. A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: Proportional rate control using relative disparity τ. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 205:291-306.
4. Backus B.T., Banks M.S. Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 1999, 28:217-242.
5. Banks M.S., Gepshtein S., Landy M.S. Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24:2077-2089.
6. Bingham G.P., Bradley A., Bailey M., Vinner R. Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:1314-1334.
7. Bingham G.P, Zaal F., Robin D., Shull J.A. Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1436-1460.
8. Bishop P.O. Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: A new interpretation. Proceeding of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 1989, 237:445-469.
9. Bradshaw M.F., Elliott K.M. The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. Spatial Vision 2003, 16:295-309.
10. Bradshaw M.F., Rogers B.J. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Research 1996, 36:3457-3468.
11. Brenner E., van Damme W.J.M. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research 1999, 39:975-986.
12. Carey D.P., Dijkerman H.C., Milner A.D. Perception and action in depth. Conscious Cognition 1998, 7:438-453.
13. Christopoulos V.N., Schrater P.R. Grasping objects with environmentally induced position uncertainty. PLOS Computational Biology 2009, 5(10):e1000538.
14. Clark J.J., Yuille A.L. Data fusion for sensory information processing systems 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
15. Cuijpers R.H., Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Consistent haptic feedback is required but it is not enough for natural reaching to virtual cylinders. Human Movement Science 2008, 27:857-872.
16. de Berg M., van Kreveld M., Overmars M., Schwarzkopf O. Computational geometry: Algorithms and applications 2000, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
17. Dijkerman H.C., Milner A.D., Carey D.P. The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane 1. Effects of visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 112:442-451.
18. Ernst M.O. Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. Journal of Vision 2007, 7:1-14.
19. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
20. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review 1980, 87:411-434.
21. Gepshtein S., Banks M.S. Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology 2003, 13:483-488.
22. Ghahramani Z., Wolpert D.M., Jordan M.I. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. Self-organization, computational maps and motor control 1997, Elsevier Press, Amsterdam. P.G. Morasso, V. Sanguineti (Eds.).
23. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1159-1178.
24. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1974, Robert E. Krieger, New York.
26. Greenwald H.S., Knill D.C. Cue integration outside central fixation: A study of grasping in depth. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-16.
27. Greenwald H.S., Knill D.C. A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension. Visual Neuroscience 2009, 26:63-72.
28. Greenwald H.S., Knill D.C., Saunders J.A. Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time. Vision Research 2005, 45:1975-1989.
29. Harris C.M., Wolpert D.M. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 1998, 394:780-784.
30. Hillis J.M., Banks M.S. Are corresponding points fixed?. Vision Research 2001, 41:2457-2473.
31. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 2004, 4:967-992.
32. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Seeing in depth: Depth perception 2002, I. Porteous, Toronto.
33. Jackson S.R., Jones C.A., Newport R., Pritchard C. A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Visual Cognition 1997, 4:113-142.
34. Jacobs R.A. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research 1999, 39:3621-3629.
35. Jakobson L.S., Goodale M.A. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1991, 86:199-208.
36. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 1984, 16:235-254.
37. Jeannerod M. The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements 1988, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
38. Keefe B.D., Watt S.J. The role of binocular vision in grasping: A small stimulus-set distorts results. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 194:435-444.
39. Knill D.C. Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: Human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research 1998, 38:1683-1711.
40. Knill D.C. Reaching for visual cues to depth: The brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. Journal of Vision 2005, 5:103-115.
41. Knill D.C., Kersten D. Visuomotor sensitivity to visual information about surface orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 91:1350-1366.
42. Knill D., Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences 2004, 27:712-719.
43. Knill D.C., Saunders J.A. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?. Vision Research 2003, 43:2539-2558.
44. Körding K.P., Wolpert D.M. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 2004, 427:244-247.
45. Landy M.S., Kojima H. Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2001, 18:2307-2320.
46. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M.J. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 1995, 35:389-412.
47. Loftus A., Servos P., Goodale M.A., Mendarozqueta N., Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: Monocular viewing and end-point variance. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 158:317-327.
48. Marotta J.J., Behrmann M., Goodale M.A. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 116:113-121.
49. Marotta J.J., Goodale M.A. The role of familiar size in the control of grasping. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:8-17.
50. Marotta J.J., Kruyer A., Goodale M.A. The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 120:134-138.
51. Marotta J.J., Perrot T.S., Nicolle D., Goodale M.A. The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation. Eye 1995, 9:333-336.
52. Marotta J.J., Perrot T.S., Nicolle D., Servos P., Goodale M.A. Adapting to monocular vision: Grasping with one eye. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 104:107-114.
53. McIntosh R., Lashley G. Matching boxes: Familiar size influences action programming. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2441-2444.
54. Melmoth D.R., Finlay A.L., Morgan M.J., Grant S. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009, 50:3711-3720.
55. Melmoth D.R., Grant S. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 17:371-388.
56. Melmoth D.R., Storoni M., Todd G., Finlay A.L., Grant S. Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183:283-298.
57. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
58. Mon-Williams M., Dijkerman H.C. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 128:578-582.
59. Morgan M.J. Vision of solid objects. Nature 1989, 339:101-103.
60. Murata A., Gallese V., Luppino G., Kaseda M., Sakata H. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 83:2580-2601.
61. Ogle K.N Researches in binocular vision 1950, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
62. Oruç I., Maloney L.T., Landy M.S. Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research 2003, 43:2451-2468.
63. Previc F.H. Functional specialisation in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1990, 13:519-575.
64. Rogers B., Graham M. Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research 1982, 22:261-270.
65. Sakata H., Taira M., Kusunoki M., Murata A., Tsutsui K., Tanaka Y., et al. Neural representation of three-dimensional features of manipulation objects with stereopsis. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 128:160-169.
66. Sakata H., Taira M., Murata A., Mine S. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5:429-438.
67. Schenk T. Visuomotor robustness is based on integration not segregation. Vision Research 2010, 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.013.
68. Schenk T., McIntosh R. Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action. Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 1:52-63.
69. Schlicht E.J., Schrater P.R. Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 182:47-57.
70. Servos P., Goodale M.A. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1994, 98:119-127.
71. Servos P., Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research 1992, 3:1513-1521.
72. Serwe S., Drewing K., Trommershäuser J. Combination of noisy directional visual and proprioceptive information. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-14.
73. Sheedy J.E., Bailey I.L., Buri M., Bass E. Binocular vs. monocular task performance. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1986, 63:839-846.
74. Smeets J.B.J., Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 1999, 3:237-271.
75. Taira M., Mine S., Georgopoulos A.P., Murata A., Sakata H. Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Experimental Brain Research 1990, 83:29-36.
76. Taira M., Tsutsui K.J., Jiang M., Yara K., Sakata H. Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 83:3140-3146.
77. Trommershäuser J., Maloney L.T., Landy M.S. Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2003, 20:1419-1433.
78. Tsirlin I, Allison R.S., Wilcox L.M. Stereoscopic transparency: Constraints on the perception of multiple surfaces. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:1-10.
79. Tsutsui K., Jiang M., Yara K., Sakata H., Taira M. Integration of perspective and disparity cues in surface-orientation-selective neurons of area CIP. Journal of Neurophysiology 2001, 86:2856-2867.
80. Tsutsui K., Sakata H., Naganuma T., Taira M. Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science 2002, 298:409-412.
81. van Ee R., Anderson B.L. Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching. Nature 2001, 410:690-694.
82. van Mierlo C.M., Louw S., Smeets J.B.J., Brenner E. Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of movement. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(3). 25, 1-8.
83. Wallace J.M., Mamassian P. The efficiency of depth discrimination for non-transparent and transparent stereoscopic surfaces. Vision Research 2004, 44:2253-2267.
84. Watt S.J., Bradshaw M.F. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:1473-1481.
85. Watt S.J., Bradshaw M.F. The visual control of reaching and grasping: Binocular disparity and motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:404-415.
86. Wickelgren E.A., McConnell D.S., Bingham G.P. Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: Forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62:1051-1059.
87. Wing A.M., Turton A., Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior 1986, 18:245-260.
88. Yuille A.L., Bülthoff H.H. Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. Perception as Bayesian inference 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York. D.C. Knill, W. Richards (Eds.).