Combination of noisy directional visual and proprioceptive information

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Serwe, Sascha ^a   Drewing, Knut ^a   Trommershäuser, Julia ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cue combination; Direction estimation; Haptic perception; Multimodal perception; Optimality; Statistical decision theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66449132878     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.5.28     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams, W. J., Graf, E. W., & Ernst, M. O. (2004). Experience can change the "light-from-above" prior. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1057-1058.
2. Adams, W. J., & Mamassian, P. (2004). Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues. Journal of Vision, 4(10):7, 921-929, http://journalofvision.org/4/10/7/, doi:10.1167/4.10.7.
3. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257-262.
4. Atkins, J. E., Fiser, J., & Jacobs, R. A. (2001). Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Research, 41, 449-461.
5. Atkins, J. E., Jacobs, R. A., & Knill, D. C. (2003). Experience-dependent visual cue recalibration based on discrepancies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Research, 43, 2603-2613.
6. Brenner, E., Granzier, J. J., & Smeets, J. B. (2007). Combining local and global contributions to perceived colour: An analysis of the variability in symmetric and asymmetric colour matching. Vision Research, 47, 114-125.
7. Ernst, M. O. (2007). Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. Journal of Vision, 7(5):7, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/7/5/7/, doi:10.1167/7.5.7.
8. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
9. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162-169.
10. Franklin, D. W., So, U., Burdet, E., & Kawato, M. (2007). Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. PLoS ONE, 2, e1336.
11. Gepshtein, S., & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483-488.
12. Gepshtein, S., Burge, J., Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2005). The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. Journal of Vision, 5(11):7, 1013-1023, http://journalofvision.org/5/11/7/, doi:10.1167/5.11.7.
13. Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 595-606.
14. Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Landy, M. S. (2002). Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science, 298, 1627-1630.
15. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1, 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/ 4/12/1/, doi:10.1167/4.12.1.
16. Jammalamadaka, S. R., Sengupta, A., & Sengupta, A. (2001). Topics in circular statistics. Singapore: World Scientific.
17. Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 712-719.
18. Knill, D. C., & Richards, W. (1996). Perception as Bayesian inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43, 2539-2558.
20. Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shams, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2, e943.
21. Landy, M. S., & Kojima, H. (2001). Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 18, 2307-2320.
22. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
23. Oruç, I., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research, 43, 2451-2468.
24. Rosas, P., Wagemans, J., Ernst, M. O., & Wichmann, F. A. (2005). Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: Reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 22, 801-809.
25. Rosas, P., Wichmann, F. A., & Wagemans, J. (2007). Texture and object motion in slant discrimination: Failure of reliability-based weighting of cues may be evidence for strong fusion. Journal of Vision, 7(6):3, 1-21, http://journalofvision.org/7/6/3/, doi:10.1167/7.6.3.
26. Scheidt, R. A., Conditt, M. A., Secco, E. L., & MussaIvaldi, F. A. (2005). Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 3200-3213.
27. van Beers, R. J., Baraduc, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2002). Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 357, 1137-1145.
28. Whiteley, L., & Sahani, M. (2008). Implicit knowledge of visual uncertainty guides decisions with asymmetric outcomes. Journal of Vision, 8(3):2, 1-15, http://journalofvision.org/8/3/2, doi:10.1167/ 8.3.2.
29. Yuille, A., & Kersten, D. (2006). Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 301-308.