A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: Proportional rate control using relative disparity τ

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 205, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 291-306

  Anderson, Joe ^a   Bingham, Geoffrey P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Perception action; Reaching; Tau; Time to contact

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARM; DARKNESS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956187316     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2361-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bingham GP (1995) The role of perception in timing: feedback control in motor programming and task dynamics. In: Covey E, Hawkins H, McMullen T, Port R (eds) Neural representation of temporal patterns. Plenum Press, New York, pp 129-157
2. GP Bingham CC Pagano 1998 The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24 145 168 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.145 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ksVyiuw%3D%3D 9483825
3. Bingham G, Zaal F (2004) Why tau is probably not used to guide reaches. In: Hecht H, Savelsbergh GJP (eds) Time-to-contact. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 371-389
4. GP Bingham F Zaal D Robin JA Shull 2000 Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26 4 1436 1460 10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1436 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fks1Cjuw%3D%3D 10946724
5. GP Bingham A Bradley M Bailey R Vinner 2001 Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27 1314 1334 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1314 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FktVWitA%3D%3D 11766927
6. GP Bingham R Coates M Mon-Williams 2007 Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed Neuropsychologia 45 288 294 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.011 17045314 (Pubitemid 44828779)
7. Bootsma RJ, Peper CLE (1992) Predictive visual information sources for the regulation of action with special emphasis on catching and hitting. In: Proteau L, Elliot D (eds) Vision and motor control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 285-314
8. MF Bradshaw KM Elliott 2003 The role of binocular information in the on-line control of prehension Spat Vis 16 295 309 10.1163/156856803322467545 12858953
9. MF Bradshaw KM Elliot SJ Watt PB Hibbard IR Davies PJ Simpson 2004 Binocular cues and the control of prehension Spat Vis 17 95 110 10.1163/156856804322778288 15078014
10. R Coates GP Bingham M Mon-Williams 2008 Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movement Exp Brain Res 189 211 220 10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5
11. AG Feldman 1986 Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model) for motor control J Mot Behav 18 17 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3jslOhtA%3D%3D 15136283
12. Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR (1990) The origin of electromyograms: explanation based on the equilibrium point hypothesis. In: Winters JM, Woo SL (eds) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York
13. JR Flanagan DJ Ostry AG Feldman 1993 Control of trajectory modifications in target-directed reaching J Mot Behav 25 140 12581985
14. AP Georgopoulos JF Kalaska JT Massey 1981 Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location J Neurophysiol 46 725 1:STN:280:DyaL38%2Fjt1CgtQ%3D%3D 7288461
15. R Gray D Regan 1998 Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information Vis Res 38 499 512 10.1016/S0042-6989(97) 00230-7 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7pslCgtQ%3D%3D 9536374 (Pubitemid 27519137)
16. N Hogan E Bizzi FA Mussa-Ivaldi T Flash 1987 Controlling multi-joint motor behavior Exerc Sport Sci Rev 15 153 10.1249/00003677-198700150-00009 1:STN:280:DyaL2s3ks1yntg%3D%3D 3297722
17. B Hopkins A Churchill S Vogt L Rönnqvist 2004 Braking reaching movements: a test of the constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions J Mot Behav 36 3 12 10.3200/JMBR.36.1.3-12 14766484 (Pubitemid 38222964)
18. SR Jackson CA Jones R Newport C Pritchard 1997 A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions Vis Cognit 4 113 142 10.1080/713756755
19. Jeannerod M (1990) The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford
20. DN Lee 1976 A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision Perception 5 437 459 10.1068/p050437 1:STN:280:DyaE2s%2FnvValuw%3D%3D 1005020
21. YL Lee CE Crabtree F Norman GP Bingham 2008 Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online Percept Psychophys 70 1042 1046 10.3758/PP.70.6.1032
22. M Marzke 1994 Evolution Adv Psychol 105 19 35 10.1016/S0166-4115(08) 61271-6
23. D Melmoth S Grant 2006 Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping Exp Brain Res 171 371 388 10.1007/s00221-005-0273-x 16323004 (Pubitemid 43780110)
24. M Mon-Williams GP Bingham 2007 Calibrating reach distance to visual targets J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33 645 656 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.645 17563227
25. M Mon-Williams HC Dijkerman 1999 The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension Exp Brain Res 128 578 582 10.1007/s002210050885 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgvFCqtw%3D%3D 10541756 (Pubitemid 29469186)
26. D Regan SJ Hamstra 1993 Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion Vis Res 33 447 462 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90252-R 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ns1Kjug%3D%3D 8503195 (Pubitemid 23088702)
27. P Servos MA Goodale 1994 Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension Exp Brain Res 98 119 127 10.1007/BF00229116 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3otlGgsQ%3D%3D 8013579
28. P Servos MA Goodale LS Jakobson 1992 The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis Vis Res 32 1513 1521 10.1016/0042-6989(92) 90207-Y 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FovVKmsA%3D%3D 1455724
29. Shadmehr R, Wise SP (2005) Computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing: a foundation for motor learning. MIT Press, Cambridge
30. JF Sondereren JJD Gon CCAM Gielen 1988 Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location Exp Brain Res 71 320 10.1007/BF00247492
31. JS Tittle JT Todd VJ Perotti JF Norman 1995 Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21 663 678 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.663 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzhtVyrsQ%3D%3D 7790840
32. JT Todd 1981 Visual information about moving objects J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7 795 810 10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.795
33. JT Todd JS Tittle JF Norman 1995 Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo Perception 24 75 86 10.1068/p240075 1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzkt1Kntw%3D%3D 7617420
34. JP Wann P Edgar D Blair 1993 Time-to-contact judgment in the locomotion of adults and preschool children J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19 1053 1065 10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.1053 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FksFCrtg%3D%3D 8228839
35. Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR (eds) (1996) Hand and brain: the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements. Academic Press, San Diego
36. EH Yilmaz WH Warren 1995 Visual control of braking: a test of the tau hypothesis J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21 996 1014 10.1037/0096-1523.21.5. 996 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FgtV2kug%3D%3D 7595250
37. F Zaal RJ Bootsma 1995 The topology of limb deceleration in prehension tasks J Mot Behav 27 193 207 12736127