Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1314-1334

  Bingham, Geoffrey P ^a   Bradley, Arthur ^b   Bailey, Michael ^b   Vinner, Roy ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 85047683105     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1314     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J., & Goodale, M. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Baird, J. C., & Biersdorf, W. R. (1967). Quantitative functions for size and distance judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 161-166.
3. Barfield, W., & Furness, T. A. (Eds.). (1995). Virtual environments and advanced interface design. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Bingham, G. P. (1993a). Optic flow from eye movement with head immobilized: "Ocular occlusion" beyond the nose. Vision Research, 33, 777-789.
5. Bingham, G. P. (1993b). Perceiving the size of trees: Form as information about scale. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1-23.
6. Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145-168.
7. Bingham, G. P., & Romack, J. L. (1999). The rate of adaptation to displacement prisms remains constant despite acquisition of rapid calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1331-1346.
8. Bingham, G. P., & Stassen, M. G. (1994). Monocular distance information in optic flow from head movement. Ecological Psychology, 6, 219-238.
9. Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F., Robin, D., & Shull, J. A. (2000). Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1436-1460.
10. Braunstein, M. L. (1962). Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: Effects of numerosity and perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 415-420.
11. Brenner, E., & Van Damme, W. J. M. (1998). Judging distance from ocular convergence. Vision Research, 38, 493-498.
12. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
13. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and motor-oriented maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
14. Elliott, D., & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of pre-movement information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39(A), 541-559.
15. Eriksson, E. S. (1974). Motion parallax during locomotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 197-200.
16. Faugeras, O. (1993). Three-dimensional computer vision: A geometric viewpoint. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Fermuller, C., Cheong, L., & Aloimonos, Y. (1997). Visual space distortion. Biological Cybernetics, 77, 323-337.
18. Fisher, S. K., & Ciuffreda, K. J. (1988). Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception, 17, 609-621.
19. Foley, J. M., & Held, R. (1972). Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction and available cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 263-268.
20. Franz, V., Gegenfurtner, K., Bülthoff, H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
21. Gentillucci, M., & Negrotti, A. (1994). Dissociation between perception and visuomotor transformation during reproduction of remembered distances. Journal of Neurophysiology, 72, 2026-2030.
22. Gilinsky, A. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460-482.
23. Gogel, W. C. (1977). The metric of visual space. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception (pp. 129-181). New York: Wiley.
24. Gogel, W. C., & Tietz, J. D. (1979). A comparison of oculo-motor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance. Vision Research, 19, 1161-1179.
25. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Servos, P. (1996). The visual pathways mediating perception and prehension. In A. M. Wing, P. Haggard, & J. R. Flanagan (Eds.), Hand and brain: The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements (pp. 15-31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
27. Graham, J. K., Bradshaw, M. F., & Davis, A. M. (1997a). Does temporal delay affect pointing accuracy in open-loop pointing in adults and children? Perception, 26, 1331-1332.
28. Graham, J. K., Bradshaw, M. F., & Davis, A. M. (1997b, October). How does temporal delay affect open-loop pointing accuracy? A comparison of adults and children aged six to ten years. Paper presented at the Conference on Vision for Reach and Grasp, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
29. Graham, J. K., Bradshaw, M. F., & Davis, A. M. (1998). The effect of pre-movement delays on pointing accuracy in middle childhood. Perception, 27, 1379-1387.
30. Green, B. F. (1961). Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 272-282.
31. Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Haffenden, A., & Goodale, M. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
33. Held, R., & Durlach, N. (1991). Telepresence, time delay and adaptation. In S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser, & A. J. Grunwald (Eds.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 232-246). London: Taylor & Francis.
34. Held, R., Efstathiou, A., & Greene, M. (1966). Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 887-891.
35. Hochberg, J. E. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Johansson, G. (1973). Monocular movement parallax and near space perception. Perception, 2, 135-146.
39. Johnston, E. B. (1991). Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research, 31, 1351-1360.
40. Kocian, D. F., & Task, H. L. (1995). Visually coupled systems hardware and the human interface. In W. Barfield & T. A. Furness (Eds.), Virtual environments and advanced interface design (pp. 175-257). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
41. Leibowitz, H. W. (1966). Role of changes in accommodation and convergence in the perception of size. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 8, 1120-1123.
42. Leibowitz, H. W. (1972). Oculomotor adjustments and constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 497-500.
43. Liang, J., Shaw, C., & Green, M. (1991, November). On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment. Paper presented at the Fourth Association for Computing Machines Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Hilton Head, SC.
44. Loomis, J. M., DaSilva, J. A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906-921.
45. Marotta, J., DeSouza, J., Haffenden, A., & Goodale, M. (1998). Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? Neuropsychologia, 36, 491-497.
46. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47. Mon-Williams, M., & Dijkerman, H. C. (1999). The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 578-582.
48. Mon-Williams, M., & Tresilian, J. R. (1999a). Ordinal depth information from accommodation. Unpublished manuscript.
49. Mon-Williams, M., & Tresilian, J. R. (1999b). Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception. Perception, 28, 167-181.
50. Nakayama, K., & Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception, 3, 63-80.
51. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 279-291.
52. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. I., & Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of 3-D length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 173-186.
53. Ono, H., & Steinbach, M. J. (1990). Monocular stereopsis with and without head movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 179-187.
54. Owens, D. A., & Liebowitz, H. W. (1980). Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 57, 540-550.
55. Pagano, C. C., & Bingham, G. P. (1998). Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1037-1051.
56. Parker, A. J., Cumming, B. G., Johnston, E. B., & Hurlbert, A. C. (1995). Multiple cues for three-dimensional shape. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 351-364). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabufetti, M., & Farne, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
58. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
59. Peli, E. (1999). Optometric and perceptual issues with head-mounted displays. In P. Mouroulis (Ed.), Visual instrumentation: Optical design and engineering principles (pp. 205-276). New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Perotti, V. J., Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1996). The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 666-679.
61. Phillips, F., & Todd, J. T. (1996). Perception of local three-dimensional shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 930-944.
62. Post, R., & Welch, R. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figurai illusions? Perception, 25, 569-581.
63. Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480-497.
64. Rogers, B. J., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41(A), 697-717.
65. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
66. Rogers, S., & Rogers, B. J. (1992). Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 446-452.
67. Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kauffman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance V: Sensory processes and perception (Vol. 1, pp. 21.1-21.57). New York: Wiley.
68. Smith, W. M., & Bowen, K. F. (1980). The effects of delayed and displaced visual feedback on motor control. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 91-101.
69. Steinbach, M. J., & Ono, H. (1991). Motion parallax judgments of depth as a function of the direction and type of head motion. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 92-98.
70. Swenson, H. A. (1932). The relative influence of accommodation and convergence in the judgment of distance. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 360-380.
71. Tharp, G., & Liu, A. (1992). Timing considerations of head mounted display performance. In SPIE (Ed.), Human vision, visual processing and digital display III (Vol. 1666, pp. 10-13). San Jose, CA: SPIE.
72. Tittle, J. S., & Braunstein, M. L. (1993). Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 157-169.
73. Tittle, J. S., & Perotti, V. J. (1997). The perception of shape and curvedness from binocular stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1167-1179.
74. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678.
75. Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
76. Todd, J. T., Tittle, J. S., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24, 75-86.
77. Toye, R. C. (1986). The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 85-92.
78. Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M., & Kelly, B. M. (1999). Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 39-44.
79. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Vindras, P., & Viviani, P. (1998). Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 569-591.
81. Vishton, P. M., Rea, J. G., Nunez, L. N., & Cutting, J. E. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
82. Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 483-495.
83. Wann, J. P., Rushton, S., & Mon-Williams, M. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731-2736.
84. Welch, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to altered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press.
85. Wickelgren, E. A., McConnell, D., & Bingham, G. P. (2000). Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: Forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1051-1059.