A genome-wide perspective on the response and tolerance to food-relevant stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 150-156

  Teixeira, Miguel C ^a   Mira, Nuno P ^a   Sá Correia, Isabel ^a  

^a Instituto de Biotecnologia e Bioengenharia Lisboa   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RESPONSE; BEVERAGE PRODUCTION; CANDIDATE TARGET; CHEMOGENOMICS; COLD SHOCK; FOOD PRODUCTION; FOOD SPOILAGE; NUTRIENT LIMITATIONS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PROTEOMICS; S.CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNALING PATHWAYS; STRESS RESPONSE; STRESS-INDUCED; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WEAK ACIDS;

BEVERAGES; ETHANOL; GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; YEAST;

SPOILAGE;

ACIDITY; ADAPTATION; CHEMICAL STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FERMENTATION; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PRESERVATION; FOOD SPOILAGE; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS;

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79954414844     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.011     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Causton H.C., Ren B., Koh S.S., Harbison C.T., Kanin E., Jennings E.G., Lee T.I., True H.L., Lander E.S., Young R.A. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2001, 12:323-337.
2. Gasch A.P., Spellman P.T., Kao C.M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M.B., Storz G., Botstein D., Brown P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11:4241-4257.
3. Mira N.P., Lourenco A.B., Fernandes A.R., Becker J.D., Sá-Correia I. The RIM101 pathway has a role in Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptive response and resistance to propionic acid and other weak acids. FEMS Yeast Res 2009, 9:202-216.
4. Mira N.P., Becker J.D., Sá-Correia I. Genomic expression program involving the Haa1p-regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to acetic acid. OMICS: J Integr Biol 2010, 14:587-601.
5. Schüller C., Mamnun Y.M., Mollapour M., Krapf G., Schuster M., Bauer B., Piper P., Kuchler K. Global phenotypic analysis and transcriptional profiling defines the weak acid stress response regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15:706-720.
6. Alexandre H., Ansanay-Galeote V., Dequin S., Blondin B. Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 2001, 498:98-103.
7. Domitrovic T., Fernandes C.M., Boy-Marcotte E., Kurtenbach E. High hydrostatic pressure activates gene expression through Msn2/4 stress transcription factors which are involved in the acquired tolerance by mild pressure precondition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 2006, 580:6033-6038.
8. Tai S.L., Daran-Lapujade P., Walsh M.C., Pronk J.T., Daran J.M. Acclimation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to low temperature: a chemostat-based transcriptome analysis. Mol Biol Cell 2007, 18:5100-5112.
9. Schade B., Jansen G., Whiteway M., Entian K.D., Thomas D.Y. Cold adaptation in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15:5492-5502.
10. Singh J., Kumar D., Ramakrishnan N., Singhal V., Jervis J., Garst J.F., Slaughter S.M., DeSantis A.M., Potts M., Helm R.F. Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to desiccation and rehydration. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:8752-8763.
11. Teixeira M.C., Raposo L.R., Mira N.P., Lourenco A.B., Sá-Correia I. Genome-wide identification of genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol in yeast: important role of FPS1. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:5761-5772.
12. Berry D.B., Gasch A.P. Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19:4580-4587.
13. Mira N.P., Palma M., Guerreiro J., Sá-Correia I. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microbial Cell Factories 2010, 9:79.
14. Abe F., Minegishi H. Global screening of genes essential for growth in high-pressure and cold environments: searching for basic adaptive strategies using a yeast deletion library. Genetics 2008, 178:851-872.
15. Hillenmeyer M.E., Fung E., Wildenhain J., Pierce S.E., Hoon S., Lee W., Proctor M., St Onge R.P., Tyers M., Koller D., et al. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 2008, 320:362-365.
16. Jungwirth H., Kuchler K. Yeast ABC transporters-a tale of sex, stress, drugs and aging. FEBS Lett 2006, 580:1131-1138.
17. Sá-Correia I., Santos S., Teixeira M., Cabrito T., Mira N. Drug:H+ antiporters in chemical stress response in yeast. Trends Microbiol 2009, 17:22-31.
18. Piper P., Mahe Y., Thompson S., Pandjaitan R., Holyoak C., Egner R., Muhlbauer M., Coote P., Kuchler K. The Pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast. EMBO J 1998, 17:4257-4265.
19. Fernandes A.R., Mira N.P., Vargas R.C., Canelhas I., Sá-Correia I. Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to weak acids involves the transcription factor Haa1p and Haa1p-regulated genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005, 337:95-103.
20. Tenreiro S., Nunes P.A., Viegas C.A., Neves M.S., Teixeira M.C., Cabral M.G., Sá-Correia I. AQR1 gene (ORF YNL065w) encodes a plasma membrane transporter of the major facilitator superfamily that confers resistance to short-chain monocarboxylic acids and quinidine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002, 292:741-748.
21. Tenreiro S., Rosa P.C., Viegas C.A., Sá-Correia I. Expression of the AZR1 gene (ORF YGR224w), encoding a plasma membrane transporter of the major facilitator superfamily, is required for adaptation to acetic acid and resistance to azoles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2000, 16:1469-1481.
22. Ando A., Nakamura T., Murata Y., Takagi H., Shima J. Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to freeze-thaw stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2007, 7:244-253.
23. Teixeira M.C., Raposo L.R., Palma M., Sá-Correia I. Identification of genes required for maximal tolerance to high-glucose concentrations, as those present in industrial alcoholic fermentation media, through a chemogenomics approach. OMICS: J Integr Biol 2010, 14:201-210.
24. Ando A., Tanaka F., Murata Y., Takagi H., Shima J. Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to high-sucrose stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6:249-267.
25. Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002, 66:300-372.
26. Hohmann S., Mager W.H. Yeast Stress Responses 1997, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
27. Pham T.K., Wright P.C. The proteomic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in very high glucose conditions with amino acid supplementation. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:4766-4774.
28. Aguilera J., Randez-Gil F., Prieto J.A. Cold response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: new functions for old mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007, 31:327-341.
29. Viegas C.A., Sa-Correia I. Effects of low temperatures (9-33°C) and pH (3.3-5.7) in the loss of Saccharomyces cerevisiae viability by combining lethal concentrations of ethanol with octanoic and decanoic acids. Int J Food Microbiol 1997, 34:267-277.
30. Ma M., Liu L.Z. Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Microbiol 2010, 10:169.
31. Ma M., Liu Z.L. Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87:829-845.
32. Toh T.H., Kayingo G., van der Merwe M.J., Kilian S.G., Hallsworth J.E., Hohmann S., Prior B.A. Implications of FPS1 deletion and membrane ergosterol content for glycerol efflux from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2001, 1:205-211.
33. Schneper L., Duvel K., Broach J.R. Sense and sensibility: nutritional response and signal integration in yeast. Curr Opin Microbiol 2004, 7:624-630.
34. Thevelein J.M., Gelade R., Holsbeeks I., Lagatie O., Popova Y., Rolland F., Stolz F., Van de Velde S., Van Dijck P., Vandormael P., et al. Nutrient sensing systems for rapid activation of the protein kinase A pathway in yeast. Biochem Soc Trans 2005, 33:253-256.
35. Crespo J.L., Hall M.N. Elucidating TOR signaling and rapamycin action: lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002, 66:579-591. table of contents.
36. Gutteridge A., Pir P., Castrillo J.I., Charles P.D., Lilley K.S., Oliver S.G. Nutrient control of eukaryote cell growth: a systems biology study in yeast. BMC Biol 2010, 8:68.
37. Marks V.D., Ho Sui S.J., Erasmus D., van der Merwe G.K., Brumm J., Wasserman W.W., Bryan J., van Vuuren H.J. Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:35-52.
38. Park H., Hwang Y.S. Genome-wide transcriptional responses to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol 2008, 46:542-548.
39. Mira N.P., Teixeira M.C., Sá-Correia I. Adaptive response and tolerance to weak acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide view. OMICS: J Integr Biol 2010, 14:525-540.
40. Westfall P.J., Patterson J.C., Chen R.E., Thorner J. Stress resistance and signal fidelity independent of nuclear MAPK function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:12212-12217.
41. Mettetal J.T., Muzzey D., Gomez-Uribe C., van Oudenaarden A. The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2008, 319:482-484.
42. Teixeira M.C., Monteiro P., Jain P., Tenreiro S., Fernandes A.R., Mira N.P., Alenquer M., Freitas A.T., Oliveira A.L., Sá-Correia I. The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D446-D451.
43. Son H.S., Hwang G.S., Kim K.M., Kim E.Y., van den Berg F., Park W.M., Lee C.H., Hong Y.S. (1)H NMR-based metabolomic approach for understanding the fermentation behaviors of wine yeast strains. Anal Chem 2009, 81:1137-1145.
44. Ding M.Z., Cheng J.S., Xiao W.H., Qiao B., Yuan Y.J. Comparative metabolomic analysis on industrial continuous and batch ethanol fermentation processes by GC-TOF-MS. Metabolomics 2009, 5:229-238.
45. Pope G.A., MacKenzie D.A., Defernez M., Aroso M.A., Fuller L.J., Mellon F.A., Dunn W.B., Brown M., Goodacre R., Kell D.B., et al. Metabolic footprinting as a tool for discriminating between brewing yeasts. Yeast 2007, 24:667-679.
46. Nevoigt E. Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2008, 72:379-412.
47. Watanabe M., Watanabe D., Akao T., Shimoi H. Overexpression of MSN2 in a sake yeast strain promotes ethanol tolerance and increases ethanol production in sake brewing. J Biosci Bioeng 2009, 107:516-518.
48. Abbott D.A., Suir E., Duong G.H., de Hulster E., Pronk J.T., van Maris A.J. Catalase overexpression reduces lactic acid-induced oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:2320-2325.
49. Alper H., Moxley J., Nevoigt E., Fink G.R., Stephanopoulos G. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 2006, 314:1565-1568.
50. Sousa M.J., Rodrigues F., Corte-Real M., Leão C. Mechanisms underlying the transport and intracellular metabolism of acetic acid in the presence of glucose in the yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Microbiology 1998, 144:665-670.
51. Martorell P., Stratford M., Steels H., Fernandez-Espinar M.T., Querol A. Physiological characterization of spoilage strains of Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii isolated from high sugar environments. Int J Food Microbiol 2007, 114:234-242.
52. Fleet G.H. Yeasts in foods and beverages: impact on product quality and safety. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2007, 18:170-175.
53. Penalva M.A., Tilburn J., Bignell E., Arst H.N. Ambient pH gene regulation in fungi: making connections. Trends Microbiol 2008, 16:291-300.