The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: A survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 536-543

  Friederich, N ^a   Verdonk, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Orthopedic surgery; Surgical navigation; Survey; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EUROPE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EUROPE; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 44449092954     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0518-x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kahler DM (2004) Image guidance: fluoroscopic navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:70-76
2. Davies BL, Rodriguez y Baena FM, Barrett AR, Gomes MP, Harris SJ, Jakopec M, Cobb JP (2007) Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221:71-80
3. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:261-269
4. Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Warth LC (2006) Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):27-28
5. Macule-Beneyto F, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM, Colomina-Rodriguez R, Hinarejos-Gomez P, Garcia-Forcada I, Seral Garcia B (2006) Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop 30:536-540
6. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7-13
7. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153-156
8. Dong H, Buxton M (2006) Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22:191-202
9. Stulberg SD (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:177-184
10. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computerassisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:682-687
11. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:152-159
12. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:131-139
13. Picard F, Deakin AH, Clarke JV, Dillon JM, Gregori A (2007) Using navigation intraoperative measurements narrows range of outcomes in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:50-57, (Epub ahead of print)
14. Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, Barrett A, Davies B (2006) Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:188-197
15. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:372-377
16. Daubresse F, Vajeu C, Loquet J (2005) Total knee arthroplasty with conventional or navigated technique: comparison of the learning curves in a community hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 71:710-713
17. European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research. ESOMAR world research codes and guidelines: Conducting market and opinion research using the internet. Available at: http://www.esomar.org/uploads/pdf/ ESOMAR_Codes&Guideline-Conducting_research_using_Internet.pdf. Accessed on July 21, 2007
18. Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL (2007) Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. J Biomech 40:728-735
19. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ (2005) Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1480-1482
20. Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook G, Spriggins AJ (2006) Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:198-202
21. Perlick L, Bathis H, Perlick C, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J (2005) Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:167-173