Minimally invasive implantation and computer navigation for a unicondylar knee system

Orthopedics

Volumn 30, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2007, Pages 66-69

  Buckup, Klaus ^a   Linke, Lars Christoph ^a   Hahne, Volker ^a  

^a KLINIKUM DORTMUND   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE NECROSIS; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 34548201642     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Clinical experience at 6-to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 367: 50-60.
2. Buckup K. Langzeitergebnisse lateraler Schlittenprothesen. In: Buckup, K ed. Die unikondyläre Schlittenprothese Pro & Contra. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Steinkopff-Verlag; 2005:78-87.
3. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11:782-788.
4. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:983-989.
5. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:17-22.
6. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:970-976.
7. Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:296-301.
8. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85:830-835.
9. Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, Parker RD, Coward DB, Scott SM. The forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70:1479-1483.
10. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999; 8:20-27.
11. Repicci JA, Hartman JF. Minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: an outpatient arthritic bypass procedure. Orthop Clin N Am. 2004; 35:201-216.
12. Buckup K. Die minimal-invasive implantation eines unikondylären kniesystems - Minimally invasive implantation of a unicondylar knee system. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2006; 18:135-154.
13. Mahlfeld K, Thermann H, Wirtz DC. Statements. In: Buckup K. Die unicondyläre Schlittenprothese Pro & Contra. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Steinkopff; 2005.
14. Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE. Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:2-8.
15. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11:40-45.
16. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Luring C, Grifka J. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a non-image-based navigation system. Int Orthop. 2004;28:193-197.